Whether viruses should be considered living or not. Introduction: Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

From your previous experiment, you found that this enhancer activates stripe 2 of eve expression. When you sequence this enhancer you find several binding sites for the gap gene, Giant. To test how Giant interacts with eve, you decide to remove all of the Giant binding sites from the eve enhancer. What results do you expect to see with respect to eve expression?

What experiment could you do to see if the maternal gene, bicoid, is sufficient to form anterior fates?

You’re curious about the effect that gap genes have on the pair-rule gene, evenskipped (eve), so you isolate and sequence each of the eve enhancers. You’re particularly interested in one of the enhancers, which is just upstream of the eve gene. Describe an experimental technique you would use to find out where this particular eve enhancer is active.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Answer 6

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Answer 7

Chapter 17, Problem 1BYB

Summary Introduction

To explain:

Whether viruses should be considered living or not.

Introduction:

Viruses are the acellular entities that are considered as small infectious agents. Viruses are known to infect all the life forms present on earth, from microbes to plants and animals. Viruses were discovered by Dmitri Ivanosky. Viruses are composed of genetic material enclosed within a protein coat known as capsid.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living. They stay in inactive crystalline form outside the host, but as soon as they enter the host they start replicating and perform functions like living beings. Viruses do not have a cellular structure. They use the machinery of the host for their own metabolic processes. So, viruses are not considered as a living being.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Conclusion

Viruses are not considered as living beings because they do not have a cellular structure and they cannot synthesize energy. They are unable to perform metabolisms, but they can use the machinery of the host to perform basic life sustaining functions. Thus, viruses are considered as a link between the living and non-living.

Answer 12

Ch. 17.1 - Describe the structure of a virus.Ch. 17.1 - Explain the basis of viral host specificity.Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 3LO Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 1A Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 2A Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 3A Ch. 17.2 - Prob. 1LO Ch. 17.2 - Prob. 1CYP Ch. 17.2 - Prob. 2CYP Ch. 17.2 - Prob. 3CYP

Concept explainers

Videos

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 17 Solutions