
(a)
The total marginal benefit
(a)

Explanation of Solution
The total marginal benefit (MB) is the sum total of individual marginal benefits. There are two consumers of mosquito abatement, such as D and L, where the marginal benefit of consumer D is
Therefore, the total marginal benefit is
Marginal benefit: Marginal benefit can be defined as the additional utility derived from the additional consumption of one or more unit of goods and services.
(b)
The optimal level of mosquito abatement.
(b)

Explanation of Solution
The optimal level of mosquito abatement is determined at the point where the total marginal benefit is equal to the marginal cost (MC).
The total marginal benefit is
The total marginal cost is given as
Now, set the two expressions to get the value of optimal quantity:
Therefore, the optimal level of mosquito abatement is 40.
Marginal benefit: Marginal benefit can be defined as the additional utility derived from the additional consumption of one or more unit of goods and services.
Marginal cost (MC): Marginal benefit refers to the amount of additional cost incurred in the process of increasing one more unit of output.
(c)
The individual total benefit at the optimal level of mosquito abatement.
(c)

Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 illustrates the MB, MC, and the optimal quantity of the mosquito abatement of consumer D as follows:
In Figure1, the vertical axis shows the MB and MC of the mosquito abatement and the horizontal axis shows the quantity of mosquito abatement, where the interaction between the total marginal benefit with MC curve determines the optimal quantity of mosquito abatement.
The MB of consumer D can be calculated by substituting the respective value in the MB function of D as follows:
Therefore, 60 is the MB of consumer D.
The MB of consumer L can be calculated by substituting the respective value in the MB function of L as follows:
Therefore, 20 is the MB of consumer D.
Therefore, the total benefit is 80
Now, the total benefit (TB) for consumer D can be calculated using the formula given below:
Now, substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to get the value of total benefit of consumer D.
Therefore, the total benefit of consumer D is 3,200.
Figure 2 illustrates the MB, MC, and the optimal quantity of the mosquito abatement of consumer L as follows:
In Figure2, the vertical axis measures the MB and MC of the mosquito abatement and the horizontal axis measures the quantity of mosquito abatement, where the interaction between the total marginal benefit with MC curve determines the optimal quantity of mosquito abatement.
The total benefit (TB) for consumer L can be calculated using the formula given below:
Now, substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to get the value of total benefit of consumer L.
Therefore, the total benefit of consumer L is 1,600.
Marginal benefit: Marginal benefit can be defined as the additional utility derived from the additional consumption of one or more unit of goods and services.
Marginal cost (MC): Marginal benefit refers to the amount of additional cost incurred in the process of increasing one more unit of output.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 17 Solutions
EBK MICROECONOMICS
- agrody calming Inted 001 and me 2. A homeowner is concerned about the various air pollutants (e.g., benzene and methane) released in her house when she cooks with natural gas. She is considering replacing her gas oven and stove with an electric stove comprising an induction cooktop and convection oven. The new appliance costs $900 to purchase and install. Capping the old gas line costs an additional $150 (a one-time fee). The old line must be inspected for leaks each year after capping, at a cost of $35 for each inspection. a. If the homeowner plans to remain in the house for four more years and the discount rate is 4%, what is the minimum present value of the benefits that the homeowner would need to experience for this purchase to be justified based on its private net sub present value? b. While trying to understand how she might express the value of reduced exposure to indoor air pollutants in dollar terms, the homeowner consulted the EPA website and found estimates provided by…arrow_forwardAfter the ban is imposed, Joe’s firm switches to the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups. This increases the cost associated with each cup of coffee it produces. Which cost curve(s) will be impacted by the use of the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups? Why? Which cost curve(s) will not shift, and why not? Please use the table below to answer this question. For the second column (“Impacted? If so, how?”), please use one of the following three choices: No shift; Shifts up (i.e., increases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes up); or Shifts down (i.e., decreases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes down). $ Cost Curve Impacted? If so, how? Explanation of the Shift: Why or Why Not AFC No shift. Fix costs stay the same, regardless of quantity. Fixed cost is calculated as Fixed Cost/Quantity. Since fixed costs remain unchanged, AFC stays the same for each quantity. MC Shifts up. Since the biodegradable cups are more expensive, the…arrow_forwardStyrofoam is non-biodegradable and is not easily recyclable. Many cities and at least one state have enacted laws that ban the use of polystyrene containers. These locales understand that banning these containers will force many businesses to turn to other more expensive forms of packaging and cups, but argue the ban is environmentally important. Shane owns a firm with a conventional production function resulting in U-shaped ATC, AVC, and MC curves. Shane's business sells takeout food and drinks that are currently packaged in styrofoam containers and cups. Graph the short-run AFC0, AVC0, ATC0, and MC0 curves for Shane's firm before the ban on using styrofoam containers.arrow_forward
- PART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forwarda-carrow_forward
- For these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forwardFor environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. cullog iba linevoz ve bubivorearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





