Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.

Explanation of Solution

The test hypothesis is given as follows:

Null hypothesis:

H0: The sequence is random.

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: The sequence is not random.

It is given that the level of significance is α=0.1.

For the run test, the test statistic will be based on the random variable V (the total number of runs).

In Table A.18, P(V≤v* when H0 is true), where v*=2,3,...20 (number of runs) and the values of n1 and n2 should be less than or equal to 10.

Computation of the test statistic:

N,N,N,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y︸,N,N,N,N︸

Here, the number of runs is, v=7.

The number of “yes” responses is n1=5.

The number of “no” responses is n2=10.

In this context, the values of n1 and n2 are not greater than 10.

Therefore, the P-value is computed as given below:

P-value=2{P(V≤7 when H0 is true)}

In Appendix A, Table A.18 “P (V ≤ v^∗ when H₀ is true) in the Runs Test”, at v*=7, the probability value corresponding to the column (5,10) is 0.455.

Therefore, the probability of the event is given below:

P-value=2(0.455)=0.91

Decision:

If P-value≤α, reject the null hypothesis H0.
If P-value>α, fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.

Conclusion:

Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is, P-value(=0.91)>α(=0.1).

By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the sequence was not random at the 0.1 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Solve the following LP problem using the Extreme Point Theorem: Subject to: Maximize Z-6+4y 2+y≤8 2x + y ≤10 2,y20 Solve it using the graphical method. Guidelines for preparation for the teacher's questions: Understand the basics of Linear Programming (LP) 1. Know how to formulate an LP model. 2. Be able to identify decision variables, objective functions, and constraints. Be comfortable with graphical solutions 3. Know how to plot feasible regions and find extreme points. 4. Understand how constraints affect the solution space. Understand the Extreme Point Theorem 5. Know why solutions always occur at extreme points. 6. Be able to explain how optimization changes with different constraints. Think about real-world implications 7. Consider how removing or modifying constraints affects the solution. 8. Be prepared to explain why LP problems are used in business, economics, and operations research.

ged the variance for group 1) Different groups of male stalk-eyed flies were raised on different diets: a high nutrient corn diet vs. a low nutrient cotton wool diet. Investigators wanted to see if diet quality influenced eye-stalk length. They obtained the following data: d Diet Sample Mean Eye-stalk Length Variance in Eye-stalk d size, n (mm) Length (mm²) Corn (group 1) 21 2.05 0.0558 Cotton (group 2) 24 1.54 0.0812 =205-1.54-05T a) Construct a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean eye-stalk length between the two diets (e.g., use group 1 - group 2).

An article in Business Week discussed the large spread between the federal funds rate and the average credit card rate. The table below is a frequency distribution of the credit card rate charged by the top 100 issuers. Credit Card Rates Credit Card Rate Frequency 18% -23% 19 17% -17.9% 16 16% -16.9% 31 15% -15.9% 26 14% -14.9% Copy Data 8 Step 1 of 2: Calculate the average credit card rate charged by the top 100 issuers based on the frequency distribution. Round your answer to two decimal places.

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.

Explanation of Solution

The test hypothesis is given as follows:

Null hypothesis:

H0: The sequence is random.

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: The sequence is not random.

It is given that the level of significance is α=0.1.

For the run test, the test statistic will be based on the random variable V (the total number of runs).

In Table A.18, P(V≤v* when H0 is true), where v*=2,3,...20 (number of runs) and the values of n1 and n2 should be less than or equal to 10.

Computation of the test statistic:

N,N,N,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y︸,N,N,N,N︸

Here, the number of runs is, v=7.

The number of “yes” responses is n1=5.

The number of “no” responses is n2=10.

In this context, the values of n1 and n2 are not greater than 10.

Therefore, the P-value is computed as given below:

P-value=2{P(V≤7 when H0 is true)}

In Appendix A, Table A.18 “P (V ≤ v^∗ when H₀ is true) in the Runs Test”, at v*=7, the probability value corresponding to the column (5,10) is 0.455.

Therefore, the probability of the event is given below:

P-value=2(0.455)=0.91

Decision:

If P-value≤α, reject the null hypothesis H0.
If P-value>α, fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.

Conclusion:

Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is, P-value(=0.91)>α(=0.1).

By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the sequence was not random at the 0.1 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.

Explanation of Solution

The test hypothesis is given as follows:

Null hypothesis:

H0: The sequence is random.

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: The sequence is not random.

It is given that the level of significance is α=0.1.

For the run test, the test statistic will be based on the random variable V (the total number of runs).

In Table A.18, P(V≤v* when H0 is true), where v*=2,3,...20 (number of runs) and the values of n1 and n2 should be less than or equal to 10.

Computation of the test statistic:

N,N,N,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y︸,N,N,N,N︸

Here, the number of runs is, v=7.

The number of “yes” responses is n1=5.

The number of “no” responses is n2=10.

In this context, the values of n1 and n2 are not greater than 10.

Therefore, the P-value is computed as given below:

P-value=2{P(V≤7 when H0 is true)}

In Appendix A, Table A.18 “P (V ≤ v^∗ when H₀ is true) in the Runs Test”, at v*=7, the probability value corresponding to the column (5,10) is 0.455.

Therefore, the probability of the event is given below:

P-value=2(0.455)=0.91

Decision:

If P-value≤α, reject the null hypothesis H0.
If P-value>α, fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.

Conclusion:

Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is, P-value(=0.91)>α(=0.1).

By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the sequence was not random at the 0.1 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.

Explanation of Solution

The test hypothesis is given as follows:

Null hypothesis:

H0: The sequence is random.

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: The sequence is not random.

It is given that the level of significance is α=0.1.

For the run test, the test statistic will be based on the random variable V (the total number of runs).

In Table A.18, P(V≤v* when H0 is true), where v*=2,3,...20 (number of runs) and the values of n1 and n2 should be less than or equal to 10.

Computation of the test statistic:

N,N,N,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y︸,N,N,N,N︸

Here, the number of runs is, v=7.

The number of “yes” responses is n1=5.

The number of “no” responses is n2=10.

In this context, the values of n1 and n2 are not greater than 10.

Therefore, the P-value is computed as given below:

P-value=2{P(V≤7 when H0 is true)}

In Appendix A, Table A.18 “P (V ≤ v^∗ when H₀ is true) in the Runs Test”, at v*=7, the probability value corresponding to the column (5,10) is 0.455.

Therefore, the probability of the event is given below:

P-value=2(0.455)=0.91

Decision:

If P-value≤α, reject the null hypothesis H0.
If P-value>α, fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.

Conclusion:

Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is, P-value(=0.91)>α(=0.1).

By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the sequence was not random at the 0.1 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.

Explanation of Solution

The test hypothesis is given as follows:

Null hypothesis:

H0: The sequence is random.

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: The sequence is not random.

It is given that the level of significance is α=0.1.

For the run test, the test statistic will be based on the random variable V (the total number of runs).

In Table A.18, P(V≤v* when H0 is true), where v*=2,3,...20 (number of runs) and the values of n1 and n2 should be less than or equal to 10.

Computation of the test statistic:

N,N,N,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y︸,N,N,N,N︸

Here, the number of runs is, v=7.

The number of “yes” responses is n1=5.

The number of “no” responses is n2=10.

In this context, the values of n1 and n2 are not greater than 10.

Therefore, the P-value is computed as given below:

P-value=2{P(V≤7 when H0 is true)}

In Appendix A, Table A.18 “P (V ≤ v^∗ when H₀ is true) in the Runs Test”, at v*=7, the probability value corresponding to the column (5,10) is 0.455.

Therefore, the probability of the event is given below:

P-value=2(0.455)=0.91

Decision:

If P-value≤α, reject the null hypothesis H0.
If P-value>α, fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.

Conclusion:

Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is, P-value(=0.91)>α(=0.1).

By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the sequence was not random at the 0.1 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Answer 6

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.

Explanation of Solution

The test hypothesis is given as follows:

Null hypothesis:

H0: The sequence is random.

Alternative hypothesis:

H1: The sequence is not random.

It is given that the level of significance is α=0.1.

For the run test, the test statistic will be based on the random variable V (the total number of runs).

In Table A.18, P(V≤v* when H0 is true), where v*=2,3,...20 (number of runs) and the values of n1 and n2 should be less than or equal to 10.

Computation of the test statistic:

N,N,N,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y,Y︸,N︸,Y︸,N,N,N,N︸

Here, the number of runs is, v=7.

The number of “yes” responses is n1=5.

The number of “no” responses is n2=10.

In this context, the values of n1 and n2 are not greater than 10.

Therefore, the P-value is computed as given below:

P-value=2{P(V≤7 when H0 is true)}

In Appendix A, Table A.18 “P (V ≤ v^∗ when H₀ is true) in the Runs Test”, at v*=7, the probability value corresponding to the column (5,10) is 0.455.

Therefore, the probability of the event is given below:

P-value=2(0.455)=0.91

Decision:

If P-value≤α, reject the null hypothesis H0.
If P-value>α, fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.

Conclusion:

Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance.

That is, P-value(=0.91)>α(=0.1).

By the rejection rule, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, there is no evidence that the sequence was not random at the 0.1 level of significance.

Thus, it can be concluded that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Answer 7

Chapter 16.7, Problem 23E

To determine

Determine whether there is evidence that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer to Problem 23E

There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the sequence supports the contentions that the sample was selected at random at 0.1 level of significance.