The person C signed a franchise agreement with company L, a fast food chain. The agreement binds C to follow the rules given in L’s operating manual. In case of non- compliance with L’s operating manual the contract will stand terminated. After nine months, fire broke out in the restaurant of C, due to which the kitchen was severely damaged. There was no mistake on the part of C but L notified that the franchise would terminate within 30 days due to non-compliance of safety procedures. To find: The possibility of the Court ruling in favor of L.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 16, Problem 4RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person C signed a franchise agreement with company L, a fast food chain. The agreement binds C to follow the rules given in L’s operating manual. In case of non- compliance with L’s operating manual the contract will stand terminated. After nine months, fire broke out in the restaurant of C, due to which the kitchen was severely damaged. There was no mistake on the part of C but L notified that the franchise would terminate within 30 days due to non-compliance of safety procedures.

To find: The possibility of the Court ruling in favor of L.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

Wiener Haus #82 has been underperforming for a few years. The franchisee (owner of Haus #82) is frustrated and files a claim against the franchisor for breach. The franchisee claims that the agreement he signed contained a statement at the start of the agreement detailing that the business model the franchisor developed was "proven effective and profitable." On these facts, does the franchisee have a winning breach of contract claim against the franchisor? O No, the contract formed was a voidable contract. Thus, the franchisor is void of responsibility if the business model does not produce profit for the franchisee. O Yes, the franchisee relied on these statements when deciding to contract and thus the franchisor should be responsible when the business model fails to work for the franchisee. O No, courts have generally held that the type of language relied upon by the franchisee is "prefatory" and does not create a duty on the part of the franchisor. O Yes, the money paid to the…

homas Persson and Jon Nokes founded Smart Inventions, Inc., to market household consumer products. The success of their first product, the Smart Mop, continued with later products, which were sold through infomercials and other means. Persson and Nokes were the firm’s officers and equal shareholders. Persson was responsible for product development, and Nokes was in charge of day-to-day operations. In time, they became dissatisfied with each other’s efforts. Nokes represented the firm as financially “dying,” “in a grim state, . . . worse than ever,” and offered to buy all of Persson’s shares for $1.6 million. Persson accepted.On the day that they signed the agreement to transfer the shares, Smart Inventions began marketing a new product—the Tap Light. It was an instant success, generating millions of dollars in revenues. In negotiating with Persson, Nokes had intentionally kept the Tap Light a secret. Persson sued Smart Inventions, asserting fraud and other claims. Under what principle…

Carlos Del Rey decided to open a Mexican fast-food restaurant and signed a franchise contract with a national chaincalled La Grande Enchilada. The contract required the franchisee to strictly follow the franchisor’s operating manualand stated that failure to do so would be grounds for terminating the franchise contract. The manual set forth detailedoperating procedures and safety standards, and provided that a La Grande Enchilada representative would inspect therestaurant monthly to ensure compliance.Nine months after Del Rey began operating his restaurant, a spark from the grill ignited an oily towel in the kitchen.No one was injured, but by the time firefighters were able to put out the fire, the kitchen had sustained extensive damage. The cook told the fire department that the towel was “about two feet from the grill” when it caught fire. This wasin compliance with the franchisor’s manual that required towels be placed at least one foot from the grills. Nevertheless,the next day La…