
Concept explainers
To find: Each year’s tuition for Colorado residents at the University of Colorado in constant 1985 dollars by using annual average consumer price index (CPI).

Answer to Problem 25E
Solution: The required each year’s tuition in constant 1985 dollars is shown below:
Year | Tuition | CPI | Adjusted Tuition ($) |
1985 | $1,332 | 107.6 | 1332 |
1987 | $1,548 | 113.6 | 1406 |
1989 | $1,714 | 124.0 | 1535 |
1991 | $1,972 | 136.2 | 1686 |
1993 | $2,122 | 144.5 | 1789 |
1995 | $2,270 | 152.4 | 1887 |
1997 | $2,356 | 160.5 | 1987 |
1999 | $2,444 | 166.6 | 2062 |
2001 | $2,614 | 177.1 | 2192 |
2003 | $3,192 | 184.0 | 2278 |
2005 | $4,446 | 195.3 | 2418 |
2007 | $5,418 | 207.3 | 2566 |
2009 | $6,446 | 214.5 | 2655 |
2011 | $7,672 | 224.9 | 2784 |
2013 | $8,760 | 233.0 | 2884 |
2015 | $9,312 | 238.7 | 2955 |
Explanation of Solution
Given: The tuition for Colorado residents at the University of Colorado is provided and the annual average consumer price index (CPI) is obtained from the table 16.1, for the respective years which are shown below:
Year | Tuition ($) | CPI |
1985 | 1332 | 107.6 |
1987 | 1548 | 113.6 |
1989 | 1714 | 124.0 |
1991 | 1972 | 136.2 |
1993 | 2122 | 144.5 |
1995 | 2270 | 152.4 |
1997 | 2356 | 160.5 |
1999 | 2444 | 166.6 |
2001 | 2614 | 177.1 |
2003 | 3192 | 184.0 |
2005 | 4446 | 195.3 |
2007 | 5418 | 207.3 |
2009 | 6446 | 214.5 |
2011 | 7672 | 224.9 |
2013 | 8760 | 233.0 |
2015 | 9312 | 238.7 |
Calculation:
The formula to convert the amount from one period to another period is shown below:
Here, time B represents the present time and time A represents the base time.
Now, convert 1987 tuition in 1985 dollars as shown below:
Also, convert 1989 tuition in 1985 dollars as shown below:
Similarly, calculated each year’s tuition in constant 1985 dollars is shown below in the tabular manner:
Year | Tuition | CPI | Adjusted Tuition ($) |
1985 | $1,332 | 107.6 | 1332 |
1987 | $1,548 | 113.6 | 1406 |
1989 | $1,714 | 124.0 | 1535 |
1991 | $1,972 | 136.2 | 1686 |
1993 | $2,122 | 144.5 | 1789 |
1995 | $2,270 | 152.4 | 1887 |
1997 | $2,356 | 160.5 | 1987 |
1999 | $2,444 | 166.6 | 2062 |
2001 | $2,614 | 177.1 | 2192 |
2003 | $3,192 | 184.0 | 2278 |
2005 | $4,446 | 195.3 | 2418 |
2007 | $5,418 | 207.3 | 2566 |
2009 | $6,446 | 214.5 | 2655 |
2011 | $7,672 | 224.9 | 2784 |
2013 | $8,760 | 233.0 | 2884 |
2015 | $9,312 | 238.7 | 2955 |
Interpretation: From the above table, it can be concluded that the adjusted tuition is increased as the CPI increased when the adjustment is done by taking the year 1985 as base.
To graph: The line plot of actual dollar tuition and constant dollars tuition on the same axes for the respective years.
Explanation:
Graph: The value of constant tuition dollar by taking 1985 dollars for the remaining years are obtained in the previous part. With the help of Excel, the two-line plots are obtained for the adjusted minimum wages and the minimum wages in constant dollars as shown below:
Step 1: Enter the data of actual tuition dollar and the constant dollar tuition during the respective years in the spreadsheet of Excel. The data is shown below:
Year | Tuition | Adjusted Tuition ($) |
1985 | $1,332 | $1,332 |
1987 | $1,548 | $1,406 |
1989 | $1,714 | $1,535 |
1991 | $1,972 | $1,686 |
1993 | $2,122 | $1,789 |
1995 | $2,270 | $1,887 |
1997 | $2,356 | $1,987 |
1999 | $2,444 | $2,062 |
2001 | $2,614 | $2,192 |
2003 | $3,192 | $2,278 |
2005 | $4,446 | $2,418 |
2007 | $5,418 | $2,566 |
2009 | $6,446 | $2,655 |
2011 | $7,672 | $2,784 |
2013 | $8,760 | $2,884 |
2015 | $9,312 | $2,955 |
Step 2: Select the data, click on Insert, and select the Line chart as shown below:
Step 3: The two line plots showing actual tuition dollar, and the constant dollar tuition is obtained as shown below:
Interpretation: From the above two line plots on the same axes, it can be concluded that the constant dollar tuition has risen steadily from the year 1985 to the year 2015 but the actual dollar tuition for these years has increases sharply. So, it can be observed from the graph that the actual dollar tuition is increasing faster than the constant tuition dollar during the period 1985 to 2015.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Statistics: Concepts and Controversies
- This problem is based on the fundamental option pricing formula for the continuous-time model developed in class, namely the value at time 0 of an option with maturity T and payoff F is given by: We consider the two options below: Fo= -rT = e Eq[F]. 1 A. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K = So. B. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K given by T K = T St dt. (Note that both options can have negative payoffs.) We use the continuous-time Black- Scholes model to price these options. Assume that the interest rate on the money market is r. (a) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option A. (Hint: use the martingale properties developed in the lectures for the stock price process in order to calculate the expectations.) (b) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option B. (c) Assuming the interest rate is very small (r ~0), use Taylor…arrow_forwardDiscuss and explain in the picturearrow_forwardBob and Teresa each collect their own samples to test the same hypothesis. Bob’s p-value turns out to be 0.05, and Teresa’s turns out to be 0.01. Why don’t Bob and Teresa get the same p-values? Who has stronger evidence against the null hypothesis: Bob or Teresa?arrow_forward
- Review a classmate's Main Post. 1. State if you agree or disagree with the choices made for additional analysis that can be done beyond the frequency table. 2. Choose a measure of central tendency (mean, median, mode) that you would like to compute with the data beyond the frequency table. Complete either a or b below. a. Explain how that analysis can help you understand the data better. b. If you are currently unable to do that analysis, what do you think you could do to make it possible? If you do not think you can do anything, explain why it is not possible.arrow_forward0|0|0|0 - Consider the time series X₁ and Y₁ = (I – B)² (I – B³)Xt. What transformations were performed on Xt to obtain Yt? seasonal difference of order 2 simple difference of order 5 seasonal difference of order 1 seasonal difference of order 5 simple difference of order 2arrow_forwardCalculate the 90% confidence interval for the population mean difference using the data in the attached image. I need to see where I went wrong.arrow_forward
- Microsoft Excel snapshot for random sampling: Also note the formula used for the last column 02 x✓ fx =INDEX(5852:58551, RANK(C2, $C$2:$C$51)) A B 1 No. States 2 1 ALABAMA Rand No. 0.925957526 3 2 ALASKA 0.372999976 4 3 ARIZONA 0.941323044 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.071266381 Random Sample CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA ARKANSAS WASHINGTON G7 Microsoft Excel snapshot for systematic sampling: xfx INDEX(SD52:50551, F7) A B E F G 1 No. States Rand No. Random Sample population 50 2 1 ALABAMA 0.5296685 NEW HAMPSHIRE sample 10 3 2 ALASKA 0.4493186 OKLAHOMA k 5 4 3 ARIZONA 0.707914 KANSAS 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.4831379 NORTH DAKOTA 6 5 CALIFORNIA 0.7277162 INDIANA Random Sample Sample Name 7 6 COLORADO 0.5865002 MISSISSIPPI 8 7:ONNECTICU 0.7640596 ILLINOIS 9 8 DELAWARE 0.5783029 MISSOURI 525 10 15 INDIANA MARYLAND COLORADOarrow_forwardSuppose the Internal Revenue Service reported that the mean tax refund for the year 2022 was $3401. Assume the standard deviation is $82.5 and that the amounts refunded follow a normal probability distribution. Solve the following three parts? (For the answer to question 14, 15, and 16, start with making a bell curve. Identify on the bell curve where is mean, X, and area(s) to be determined. 1.What percent of the refunds are more than $3,500? 2. What percent of the refunds are more than $3500 but less than $3579? 3. What percent of the refunds are more than $3325 but less than $3579?arrow_forwardA normal distribution has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 4. Solve the following three parts? 1. Compute the probability of a value between 44.0 and 55.0. (The question requires finding probability value between 44 and 55. Solve it in 3 steps. In the first step, use the above formula and x = 44, calculate probability value. In the second step repeat the first step with the only difference that x=55. In the third step, subtract the answer of the first part from the answer of the second part.) 2. Compute the probability of a value greater than 55.0. Use the same formula, x=55 and subtract the answer from 1. 3. Compute the probability of a value between 52.0 and 55.0. (The question requires finding probability value between 52 and 55. Solve it in 3 steps. In the first step, use the above formula and x = 52, calculate probability value. In the second step repeat the first step with the only difference that x=55. In the third step, subtract the answer of the first part from the…arrow_forward
- If a uniform distribution is defined over the interval from 6 to 10, then answer the followings: What is the mean of this uniform distribution? Show that the probability of any value between 6 and 10 is equal to 1.0 Find the probability of a value more than 7. Find the probability of a value between 7 and 9. The closing price of Schnur Sporting Goods Inc. common stock is uniformly distributed between $20 and $30 per share. What is the probability that the stock price will be: More than $27? Less than or equal to $24? The April rainfall in Flagstaff, Arizona, follows a uniform distribution between 0.5 and 3.00 inches. What is the mean amount of rainfall for the month? What is the probability of less than an inch of rain for the month? What is the probability of exactly 1.00 inch of rain? What is the probability of more than 1.50 inches of rain for the month? The best way to solve this problem is begin by a step by step creating a chart. Clearly mark the range, identifying the…arrow_forwardClient 1 Weight before diet (pounds) Weight after diet (pounds) 128 120 2 131 123 3 140 141 4 178 170 5 121 118 6 136 136 7 118 121 8 136 127arrow_forwardClient 1 Weight before diet (pounds) Weight after diet (pounds) 128 120 2 131 123 3 140 141 4 178 170 5 121 118 6 136 136 7 118 121 8 136 127 a) Determine the mean change in patient weight from before to after the diet (after – before). What is the 95% confidence interval of this mean difference?arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





