![Survey Of Accounting](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780077862374/9780077862374_largeCoverImage.gif)
a.
Ascertain the
a.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
Net present value method:
Net present value method is the method which is used to compare the initial
Ascertain the net present value of each opportunity, and state whether person R should adopt the net present value approach as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Net present value of opportunity 1 | |||
Year | Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $55,000 | 0.925926 | $50,925.93 |
2 | $59,000 | 0.857339 | $50,583.00 |
3 | $79,000 | 0.793832 | $62,712.73 |
4 | $100,000 | 0.735030 | $73,503.00 |
Total present value of | $537,724.66 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $ 37,724.66 |
Table (1)
Opportunity 2:
Net present value of opportunity 2 | |||
Year | Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $102,000 | 0.925926 | $94,444.45 |
2 | $108,000 | 0.857339 | $92,592.61 |
3 | $20,000 | 0.793832 | $15,876.64 |
4 | $16,000 | 0.735030 | $14,700.60 |
Total present value of cash flows | $217,614.30 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $17,614.30 |
Table (2)
In this case, opportunity 1is better for the investment, because opportunity 1 ($37,724.66) has higher net present value than opportunity 2 ($17,614.30).
b.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person R should adopt the pay back approach.
b.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
Payback period: Payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the proposal of long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person R should approve the given project or not as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Cash payback period of opportunity 1 | ||
Years and months | Net cash flows ($) | Cumulative net cash flows ($) |
1 | 55,000 | 55,000 |
2 | 59,000 | 114,000 |
3 | 79,000 | 193,000 |
1 month (1) |
7,000 | 200,000 |
Table (3)
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 1 is 3 years and 1 month.
Opportunity 2:
Cash payback period of opportunity 2 | ||
Year and months | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows |
1 | 102,000 | 102,000 |
11 months (2) |
98,000 | 160,000 |
Table (4)
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 2 is 1 year and 11 months.
In this case, opportunity 2 is better for the investment, because opportunity 2 has shorter payback period than opportunity 1.
Working note (1):
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 1:
Working note (2):
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 2:
c.
Compare the net present value approach with the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given situation.
c.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
Compare the net present value approach with the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given situation as follows:
The net present value approach represents the net cash flow with consideration of the time value of money, whereas cash payback technique neglects cash flows occurring after the payback period, and it does not use the present value concept (time value of money) in valuing cash flows that are occurring in the different time period. In other word, payback period approach measures the risk of the investment rather than the profitability.
If an investor is very concerned about the risk of an investment, then the payback period approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 2 is better for the investment.
If an investor is very concerned about the profitability of an investment, then the net present value approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 1 is better for the investment.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Survey Of Accounting
- Fairfield Company's payroll costs for the most recent month are summarized here: Item Hourly labor unges Description 920 hours $27 per hour 190 hours for Job 101 340 hours for Job 102 Factory supervision Production engineer Factory Janitorial work Selling, general, and administrative salaries Total payroll costs Required: 390 hours for Job 103 Total Cost $ 5,130 9,180 10,530 $ 24,840 4,350 7,100 1,200 8,800 $ 46,298 1. & 2. Prepare the journal entries for payroll and to apply manufacturing overhead to production. The company applies manufacturing overhead to products at a predetermined rate of $54 per direct labor hour Note: If no entry is required for a transaction/event, select "No Journal Entry Required" in the first account field. View transaction list Journal entry worksheet A B Record Fairfield Company's payroll costs to be paid at a later date. Note Enter debits before credits. S.No Date 1 Account Title Debit Creditarrow_forwardNo wrong answerarrow_forwardL.L. Bean operates two factories that produce its popular Bean boots (also known as "duck boots") in its home state of Maine. Since L.L. Bean prides itself on manufacturing its boots in Maine and not outsourcing, backorders for its boots can be high. In 2014, L.L. Bean sold about 450,000 pairs of the boots. At one point during 2014, it had a backorder level of about 100,000 pairs of boots. L.L. Bean can manufacture about 2,200 pairs of its duck boots each day with its factories running 24/7. In 2015, L.L. Bean expects to sell more than 500,000 pairs of its duck boots. As of late November 2015, the backorder quantity for Bean Boots was estimated to be about 50,000 pairs. Question: Now assume that 5% of the L.L. Bean boots are returned by customers for various reasons. L. Bean has a 100% refund policy for returns, no matter what the reason. What would the journal entry be to accrue L.L. Bean's sales returns for this one pair of boots?arrow_forward
- The following data were taken from the records of Splish Brothers Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025. Raw Materials Inventory 7/1/24 $58,100 Accounts Receivable $28,000 Raw Materials Inventory 6/30/25 46,600 Factory Insurance 4,800 Finished Goods Inventory 7/1/24 Finished Goods Inventory 6/30/25 99,700 Factory Machinery Depreciation 17,100 21,900 Factory Utilities 29,400 Work in Process Inventory 7/1/24 21,200 Office Utilities Expense 9,350 Work in Process Inventory 6/30/25 29,400 Sales Revenue 560,500 Direct Labor 147,550 Sales Discounts 4,700 Indirect Labor 25,360 Factory Manager's Salary 63,400 Factory Property Taxes 9,910 Factory Repairs 2,500 Raw Materials Purchases 97,300 Cash 39,200 SPLISH BROTHERS COMPANY Income Statement (Partial) $arrow_forwardNo AIarrow_forwardL.L. Bean operates two factories that produce its popular Bean boots (also known as "duck boots") in its home state of Maine. Since L.L. Bean prides itself on manufacturing its boots in Maine and not outsourcing, backorders for its boots can be high. In 2014, L.L. Bean sold about 450,000 pairs of the boots. At one point during 2014, it had a backorder level of about 100,000 pairs of boots. L.L. Bean can manufacture about 2,200 pairs of its duck boots each day with its factories running 24/7.In 2015, L.L. Bean expects to sell more than 500,000 pairs of its duck boots. As of late November 2015, the backorder quantity for Bean Boots was estimated to be about 50,000 pairs. Question: Assume that a pair of 8" Bean Boots are ordered on December 3, 2015. The order price is $109. The sales tax rate in the state in which the boots are order is 7%. L.L. Bean ships the boots on January 29, 2016. Assume same-day shipping for the sake of simplicity. On what day would L.L. Bean recognize the…arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
![Text book image](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259964947/9781259964947_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337272094/9781337272094_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337619202/9781337619202_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134475585/9780134475585_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259722660/9781259722660_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259726705/9781259726705_smallCoverImage.gif)