
a.
Ascertain the
a.

Explanation of Solution
Net present value method:
Net present value method is the method which is used to compare the initial
Ascertain the net present value of each opportunity, and state whether person R should adopt the net present value approach as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Net present value of opportunity 1 | |||
Year | Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $55,000 | 0.925926 | $50,925.93 |
2 | $59,000 | 0.857339 | $50,583.00 |
3 | $79,000 | 0.793832 | $62,712.73 |
4 | $100,000 | 0.735030 | $73,503.00 |
Total present value of | $537,724.66 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $ 37,724.66 |
Table (1)
Opportunity 2:
Net present value of opportunity 2 | |||
Year | Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $102,000 | 0.925926 | $94,444.45 |
2 | $108,000 | 0.857339 | $92,592.61 |
3 | $20,000 | 0.793832 | $15,876.64 |
4 | $16,000 | 0.735030 | $14,700.60 |
Total present value of cash flows | $217,614.30 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $17,614.30 |
Table (2)
In this case, opportunity 1is better for the investment, because opportunity 1 ($37,724.66) has higher net present value than opportunity 2 ($17,614.30).
b.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person R should adopt the pay back approach.
b.

Explanation of Solution
Payback period: Payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the proposal of long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person R should approve the given project or not as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Cash payback period of opportunity 1 | ||
Years and months | Net cash flows ($) | Cumulative net cash flows ($) |
1 | 55,000 | 55,000 |
2 | 59,000 | 114,000 |
3 | 79,000 | 193,000 |
1 month (1) |
7,000 | 200,000 |
Table (3)
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 1 is 3 years and 1 month.
Opportunity 2:
Cash payback period of opportunity 2 | ||
Year and months | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows |
1 | 102,000 | 102,000 |
11 months (2) |
98,000 | 160,000 |
Table (4)
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 2 is 1 year and 11 months.
In this case, opportunity 2 is better for the investment, because opportunity 2 has shorter payback period than opportunity 1.
Working note (1):
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 1:
Working note (2):
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 2:
c.
Compare the net present value approach with the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given situation.
c.

Explanation of Solution
Compare the net present value approach with the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given situation as follows:
The net present value approach represents the net cash flow with consideration of the time value of money, whereas cash payback technique neglects cash flows occurring after the payback period, and it does not use the present value concept (time value of money) in valuing cash flows that are occurring in the different time period. In other word, payback period approach measures the risk of the investment rather than the profitability.
If an investor is very concerned about the risk of an investment, then the payback period approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 2 is better for the investment.
If an investor is very concerned about the profitability of an investment, then the net present value approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 1 is better for the investment.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
SURVEY OF ACCOUNTING-ACCESS
- Please explain the solution to this financial accounting problem using the correct financial principles.arrow_forwardDavid Manufacturing has budgeted sales for March, April, and May of 15,500, 19,800, and 17,300 units, respectively. Each unit that David Manufacturing produces uses 4.2 pounds of raw material. The company requires 25% of the next month's budgeted production as raw material inventory each month. David Manufacturing currently pays a standard rate of $1.75 per pound for raw materials. Each unit should be produced in 15 minutes of direct labor time at a standard direct labor rate of $14.50 per hour. Manufacturing overhead is applied at a standard rate of $18.50 per direct labor hour. Calculate the standard cost per unit for David Manufacturing. (Round your answer to 2 decimal places.)arrow_forwardCan you solve this general accounting problem using appropriate accounting principles?arrow_forward
- Please provide the accurate answer to this general accounting problem using valid techniques.arrow_forwardPlease provide the correct answer to this general accounting problem using valid calculations.arrow_forwardOn May 1, 2020, Jolie Corporation has a beginning Work in Process inventory of zero. All materials are added into production at the beginning of its production. There is only one production WIP inventory. During the month, 35,800 units were started. At the end of the month, all started units were 75% complete with respect to conversion. Direct Materials placed into production had a total cost of $286,400, and the total conversion cost for the month was $429,600. Jolie Corporation uses the weighted-average process costing method. Use this information to determine the cost per equivalent unit of conversion for the month of May. (Round the answer to the nearest cent.)arrow_forward
- Can you help me with General accounting question?arrow_forwardI want answer with all working formatarrow_forwardMaxwell Parts Co. sells automotive parts to dealers on credit terms of net 45. The company's annual credit sales are $24 million, evenly distributed throughout the year. Its variable cost ratio is 0.65, and its average accounts receivable is $3 million. Using this information, determine: A Average daily credit sales b. Average collection period (in days) c. Average investment in receivables (at cost)arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





