
a.
Ascertain the
a.

Explanation of Solution
Net present value method:
Net present value method is the method which is used to compare the initial
Ascertain the net present value of each opportunity, and state whether person R should adopt the net present value approach as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Net present value of opportunity 1 | |||
Year | Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $55,000 | 0.925926 | $50,925.93 |
2 | $59,000 | 0.857339 | $50,583.00 |
3 | $79,000 | 0.793832 | $62,712.73 |
4 | $100,000 | 0.735030 | $73,503.00 |
Total present value of | $537,724.66 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $ 37,724.66 |
Table (1)
Opportunity 2:
Net present value of opportunity 2 | |||
Year | Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $102,000 | 0.925926 | $94,444.45 |
2 | $108,000 | 0.857339 | $92,592.61 |
3 | $20,000 | 0.793832 | $15,876.64 |
4 | $16,000 | 0.735030 | $14,700.60 |
Total present value of cash flows | $217,614.30 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $17,614.30 |
Table (2)
In this case, opportunity 1is better for the investment, because opportunity 1 ($37,724.66) has higher net present value than opportunity 2 ($17,614.30).
b.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person R should adopt the pay back approach.
b.

Explanation of Solution
Payback period: Payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the proposal of long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person R should approve the given project or not as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Cash payback period of opportunity 1 | ||
Years and months | Net cash flows ($) | Cumulative net cash flows ($) |
1 | 55,000 | 55,000 |
2 | 59,000 | 114,000 |
3 | 79,000 | 193,000 |
1 month (1) |
7,000 | 200,000 |
Table (3)
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 1 is 3 years and 1 month.
Opportunity 2:
Cash payback period of opportunity 2 | ||
Year and months | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows |
1 | 102,000 | 102,000 |
11 months (2) |
98,000 | 160,000 |
Table (4)
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 2 is 1 year and 11 months.
In this case, opportunity 2 is better for the investment, because opportunity 2 has shorter payback period than opportunity 1.
Working note (1):
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 1:
Working note (2):
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 2:
c.
Compare the net present value approach with the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given situation.
c.

Explanation of Solution
Compare the net present value approach with the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given situation as follows:
The net present value approach represents the net cash flow with consideration of the time value of money, whereas cash payback technique neglects cash flows occurring after the payback period, and it does not use the present value concept (time value of money) in valuing cash flows that are occurring in the different time period. In other word, payback period approach measures the risk of the investment rather than the profitability.
If an investor is very concerned about the risk of an investment, then the payback period approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 2 is better for the investment.
If an investor is very concerned about the profitability of an investment, then the net present value approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 1 is better for the investment.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
SURVEY OF ACCOUNTING-ACCESS
- I want to this question answer general accountingarrow_forwardSales commissions are $6,000 when 1,500 units are sold and $12,000 when 3,000 units are sold. Using the high-low method, what is the variable portion of sales salaries and commissions?arrow_forwardHello tutor provide answer this financial accounting questionarrow_forward
- Maxwell Corp., which began business at the start of the current year, had the following data: The company planned and actually produced 50,000 units. It sold 47,000 units at a price of $18 per unit. The production costs included a variable cost of $6 per unit and total fixed costs of $300,000. Selling and administrative costs consisted of a variable cost of $2 per unit and fixed costs of $40,000. What is the gross margin that the company would disclose on an absorption-costing income statement?arrow_forwardOn August 1, 2019, Rockwell Logistics purchased a truck for $75,000. The truck has a useful life of 6 years and a residual value of $7,500. The truck is depreciated using the straight- line method. What is the depreciation expense for 2019?arrow_forwardWhat was ball's cost of goods manufactured for the month?arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





