
Case summary:
Given that MM is a major customer, the company has to take a decision whether to comply with MM’s stipulation of converting from bar codes to RFID, for the labels on its products. Perhaps MM would have asked all the suppliers to changeover and also would have given a deadline when this changeover would be effective.
Not complying with MM’s stipulation, the company has to face the risk of losing a major customer. Given that RFID technologies are replacing bar code processes, perhaps all customers would sooner than later ask its suppliers to change over to RFID labels as it is a superior technology compared to bar code labels.
Therefore, the company has no option but to adopt RFID technology. The changeover would mean additional investment.
To determine: The ethical issues in the situations and the things should be done by the company.

Explanation of Solution
The company can consider the following:
- The company can suggest to MM to choose one prominent RFID technology vendor to carry out the conversion for all its suppliers, so that there are not only scale economies which would reduce the cost, but also ensure compatibility with the technological processes of MM.
- MM can co-ordinate the work with the vendor for the change-over process.
- MM can consider assisting (i) in part funding the additional investment (ii) agreeing to a higher price to make up for the additional investment, (iii) underwrite larger off-take volumes so that the additional cost gets spread out to larger volumes.
- The company can aggressively market its products to other customers, so that the production volumes increase significantly and thereby reducing the unit cost.
The ethical dilemma is for MM, as to whether they should invest to gain supplier loyalty or not. MM should obviously help its suppliers with the changeover in technology.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Principles Of Operations Management
- Negotiators can gain several benefits from using the strategy of multiple equivalent simultaneous offers. By offering multiple options it reduces the chance of rejection. It also improves the chances of reaching reaching an agreement. By presenting multiple offers, it shows you are flexible. disagree with this post or add on to the postarrow_forwardThe strategy of Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers involves presenting several equally valuable options to the other party during negotiations. This approach benefits negotiators by creating flexibility and increasing the chances of finding a mutually agreeable solution. By offering multiple options, negotiators show that they are open to compromise, which can build trust and make the negotiation process smoother. It also helps avoid getting stuck on one issue, as the other party can choose from several alternatives that meet their needs. In my experience, using MESOs in a work negotiation helped both parties reach an agreement more quickly because each option was carefully thought out to address different needs, and this made it easier for us to settle on one that worked for both sides. This strategy can also reveal what is most important to the other party, helping negotiators understand their priorities better. agree or disagree with the postarrow_forwardExamine the conflicts between improving customer service levels and controlling costs in sales. Strategies to Balance Both customer service levels and controlling costs in sales 1.Outsourcing and workforce optimization 2. AI-driven customer supportarrow_forward
- how can you gain trust in a negotiation setting?arrow_forward✓ Custom $€ .0 .on File Home Insert Share Page Layout Formulas Data Review View Help Draw Arial 10 B B14 ✓ X✓ fx 1400 > 甘く 曲 > 冠 > Comments Editing ✓ . . . P Q R S T 3 A Production cost ($/unit) B с D E F G H J K L M N $74.00 4 Inventory holding cost ($/unit) $1.50 5 Lost sales cost ($/unit) $82.00 6 Overtime cost ($/unit) $6.80 7 Undertime cost ($/unit) $3.20 8 Rate change cost ($/unit) $5.00 9 Normal production rate (units) 2,000 10 Ending inventory (previous Dec.) 800 11 Cumulative 12 13 Month Demand Cumulative Demand Product Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Cumulative Cumulative Product Sales 14 January 1,400 1,475 15 FUERANZ222222223323333BRUINE 14 February 1,000 2,275 Month January February Demand Demand Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Sales 1,400 #N/A 1,475 #N/A #N/A #N/A 1,000 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 16 March 1,800 2,275 March 1,800 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 17 April 2,700 2,275 April 2,700 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 18 May 3,000 2,275 May 3,000 #N/A…arrow_forwardFollow guidelines and summarize in a paragrapharrow_forward
- Contemporary MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033777Author:Louis E. Boone, David L. KurtzPublisher:Cengage LearningPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational Publishing

