Why the imposition of pollution tax of more than the actual value of the damage is unfair.
Explanation of Solution
When firms in the industry that pollute are charged with tax rates of higher value than the actual pollution value caused by the firm, the firm would increase the
When the penalty is equal to the marginal damage cost incurred by the polluting firm, the price paid by the consumers for the product would increase. The increase in the price of the commodity of the polluting firm would take place up to the point where the price equals the marginal
Pollution tax: Pollution tax is a measure adopted by the government to control the pollution by the firms through charging a tax rate for each unit of pollution generated by the firm.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (12th Edition)
- What happens in the market for a good that pollutes the air when it is manufactured if government decides to tax consumers when the product is purchased? Will this reduce the amount of air pollution?arrow_forwardThe table below shows the demand for pollution permits to emit hydrocarbons in a particular industrial park. Each permit allows the owner to release one tonne of pollutants into the atmosphere. Price perPollution Permit Quantity of Permits $4,500 75 4,000 150 3,500 225 3,000 300 2,500 375 2,000 450 1,500 525 a. If no fee for a pollution permit were charged, how many tonnes of pollutants would be discharged into the atmosphere, assuming a straight-line demand curve? Quantity: tonnesb. Suppose government were to set a fee of $3,500 per pollution permit. How many tonnes of pollutants would now be dumped? What is the total revenue received by government? Quantity: tonnes Total revenue: $ c. Suppose that a new technology allows for a significant reduction in hydrocarbons at a relatively low cost so that the demand for pollution permits in the industrial park drops by 150 tonnes. Assuming that government holds the permit fee at $3,500, how many tonnes of…arrow_forwardSummarize the effects of the Clean Air Act on U.S. air pollution.arrow_forward
- The following companies all manufacture widgets and dump tons of glop into the air. Manufacturer Cost to clean up 1 ton of glop Current contribution to overall pollution (tons of glop) 200 Polluters-R-Us Smog Brothers, Inc. Really Dirty Industries 0 $ 70 100 30 The government wants to halve total pollution but does not know how much it will cost each company. the government employs a tradable permit scheme in which it gives the same number of permits to each manufacturer at no cost, the total cost of cleanup for Smog Brothers, Inc., after the exchange of permits, is $ 7,000 6,000 13,000 200 200arrow_forwardWhen studying pollution and the environment, economists A) emphasize costs and benefits. B) attempt to reduce pollution at all costs. C) think pollution is good if it occurs when production takes place. D) have no role to play. E) concentrate on the physical aspects of the environment.arrow_forwardcreate a scipt about pollution as a social issue for a commercial video.arrow_forward
- draw a graph of a product without any externalityarrow_forwardWhy has supply and demand failed to prevent pollution?arrow_forwardImagine the government of California has proposed a new tax on vehicles based on the amount of emissions they produce in a year. In 2019, there will be 20 tons of emissions produced. The governor’s office has run the calculations and found that the socially optimal level is 14 tons and the marginal damage from each unit of pollution is $150. Imagine there are two types of drivers in California: commuters and non-commuters. Imagine that the marginal cost of reducing pollution for commuters is MCA_C=150Q and the marginal cost of reducing pollution for non-commuters is MCA_N=30Q. Each type initially created ten tons of pollution each. Their total cost of reductions is equal to TCA_C=75Q^2 and TCA_N=15Q^2. How much would each type choose to reduce under the tax? Imagine the governor instead suggested forcing all drivers to reduce their emissions by 30% from their 2019 levels. How would the costs of reduction here compare to the taxation case (please provide actual numbers)? Do you…arrow_forward
- Show graphically and explain how an increase in environmental awareness affects the market for bottled water.arrow_forwardMacmillan Learning The accompanying schedule depicts the marginal social cost (MSC) and the marginal social benefit (MSB) associated with pollution emissions. Assume the polluters bear none of the social cost of pollution and all of the benefits. Quantity is measured in tons. Social Cost- Benefit Schedule Q MSB MSC What is the socially optimal amount of pollution? 9 tons 7 tons 8 tons 0 tons What is the size of the tax that would move the market to this socially optimal quantity? What is the size of the tax that would move the market to this socially optimal quantity? $135 per ton $105 per ton $120 per ton $150 per ton 4 180 60 09 5 165 75 75 6 150 90 00 7 135 105 8 120 120 9 105 135 10 90 150 = 11 75 165 12 60 00 180 13 45 195 14 30 210 15 15 225 16 0 240arrow_forwardWhat are externalities; and how the government can fix itarrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning