Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507140
Author: David C. Colander
Publisher: McGraw Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 6QE
To determine
Identify the market structure that best characterizes the market for breakfast cereals.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Pizza Hut and Domino's are the leading pizza chains in terms of market share. If the price of Domino's rises significantly, all else equal, what impact will that have on Pizza Hut?
Pizza Hut's demand will shift left
Pizza Hut's demand will shift right
Pizza Hut's supply will shift left
Pizza Hut's supply will shift right
Suppose three firms compete in a homogeneous-product Cournot industry. The market elasticity of demand for the product is −2, and each firm’s marginal cost of production is $50. What is the profit-maximizing equilibrium price?
China is making money by being a global leader in solar cell production.
Which of these explains why the United States is not dominating this
market?
The US does not have adequate sunlight to warrant investing in solar
technology.
Solar is unlikely to be a major energy source in the future.
The fossil fuel industry has been successful in slowing this transition.
Smart grids are incompatible with solar cells.
The US has focused on dominating the wind turbine market instead.
Chapter 15 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 15 - Prob. 1QECh. 15 - Prob. 2QECh. 15 - Prob. 3QECh. 15 - Prob. 4QECh. 15 - Prob. 5QECh. 15 - Prob. 6QECh. 15 - Prob. 7QECh. 15 - Prob. 8QECh. 15 - Prob. 9QECh. 15 - Prob. 10QECh. 15 - Prob. 11QECh. 15 - Prob. 12QECh. 15 - Prob. 13QECh. 15 - Prob. 14QECh. 15 - Prob. 15QECh. 15 - Prob. 16QECh. 15 - Prob. 17QECh. 15 - Prob. 18QECh. 15 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 1IPCh. 15 - Prob. 2IPCh. 15 - Prob. 3IPCh. 15 - Prob. 4IPCh. 15 - Prob. 5IPCh. 15 - Prob. 6IPCh. 15 - Prob. 7IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- A) Suppose there are just two firms, 1 and 2, in the oil market and the inverse demand for oil is given by P = 90 – 3Q. The marginal cost for each firm is €18. Calculate the level of output that each firm would produce at the Cournot equilibrium. B) Suppose there are just two firms, 1 and 2, in the oil market and the inverse demand for oil is given by P = 60 – Q. The marginal cost for each firm is €36. What price should Firm 1 charge at the Cournot equilibrium? C) Consider the production function Q = 10KL. Will the MRTS for this production function remain constant along the Q = 200 isoquant? Explain briefly.arrow_forwardThe figure shows the market demand curve for penicillin, an antibiotic medicine. Initially, the market was supplied by perfectly competitive firms. Later, the government granted the exclusive right to produce and sell penicillin to one firm. The figure also shows the marginal revenue curve (MR) of the firm once it begins to operate as a monopoly. The marginal cost is constant at $3. irrespective of the market structure. After the market changes from perfect competition to a monopoly.. OA. social surplus decreases OB. consumer surplus increases. OC. deadweight loss decreases OD. the market price decreases -COD- Price/Cost (5) 10 9 10 20 30 MR 40 60 00 Demand 70 BO so Quanety (units)arrow_forwardConsider the market for cola soft drinks where Pepsi and Coke are dominating this market with well above 90% markets share combined. Under what market structure do Pepsi and Coke operate? What microeconomic model can best describe the behavior of Pepsi and Coke? Explain the main theme of this model. Given the obvious market share of both Pepsi and Coke, on what grounds would you justify the multibillion-dollar annual advertising spending by those two companies?arrow_forward
- Consider an electricity market where there are three suppliers, each with constant marginal cost (a reasonable approximation in electricity generation). Firm 1 has a capacity of 200 at MC = 5. Firm 2 has a capacity of 100 at MC = 8. Firm 3 has a capacity of 100 at MC = 10. a. If the three firms are price takers (i.e., behave competitively), what is the industry supply curve? b. Compute the equilibrium price and quantity when the market demand is Q(P) = 1000/p0.s. %3D c. Compute the equilibrium price and quantity when the market demand is Q(P) = 750/p0.5. %3D d. Compute the equilibrium price and quantity when the market demand is Q(P) = 500/P0.5.arrow_forwardA firm has some market power and so can choose to change its price. An analyst employed by the firm runs some numbers from the sales over last couple of months and figures out the demand for the firm's product is inelastic (at the current price the firm charges). She suggests to the management that they should cut the price. Is she right to suggest lowering the price? Explain why.arrow_forward2. Stackelberg Firms 1, 2 and 3 compete in quantities. The inverse market demand is given by p = 400 (91 +92 +93), where 91, 92 and q3 are the quantities produced by firms 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The marginal cost for firm 1 is c₁ = 20, and the marginal cost for both firm 2 and firm 3 is 40. The order of play is as follows: Firm 1 first sets a quantity q₁. Then, firms 2 and 3 observe q₁ and simultaneously set q2 and 93. Each firm sets its quantity to maximize its own profits. (a) Let us first consider the optimal action of firm 2. Given a value q₁ initially set by firm 1 and a value of q3 set by firm 3, what is the value of q2 that maximizes the profits of firm 2? Hint: Your answer should provide q2 in terms of 91 and 93. (b) Notice that, after firm 1 sets q1, a subgame starts, in which firms 2 and 3 simultaneously set q2 and 93. Given 91, find the values of q2 and q3 that firms 2 and 3 must set in a Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium. Hint: Your answer should provide q2 and q3 in…arrow_forward
- Many home improvement retailers like Home Depot and Lowe’s have low-price guarantee policies. At a minimum, these guarantees promise to match a rival’s price, and some promise to beat the lowest advertised price by a given percentage. Do these types of pricing strategies result in cutthroat Bertrand competition and zero economic profits? If not, why not? If so, suggest an alternative pricing strategy that will permit these firms to earn positive economic profits.arrow_forwardThere are two soda firms Apple and Dell in Cournot completion . The market inverse demand is P = 32 – Q1-Q2 Marginal cost for both firms is 8. Find the reaction functions and equilibrium strategies and equilibrium price/quantity from this market. Show your work and clearly mark your answers. Request: Please provide graph if applicable. Please provide a typed answer. Your help is much appreciated!arrow_forwardNeed answer for part b only Zeus and Iron are the only two cement producers in Gotham. The cement they produce is essentially identical. In this market, each firm chooses the output level to produce and the price is determined by aggregate output (Cournot competition). The inverse demand for cement is given by P = 225 − Q/2 . Q is measured in tons and P is in euros. The marginal cost for Zeus is constant at 50 euros/ton. The respective cost for Iron is constant at 40 euros/ton. A technological innovation in the production process allows both firms to reduce marginal cost by 5 euros/ton. a) How much would each firm be willing to pay for the innovation, if it were the only firm to acquire it? b) Consider a situation where firms’ managers, simultaneously and non-cooperatively decide whether to acquire the innovation or not, which costs 900 euros, and then compete in quantities. What is the equilibrium of this game, based on its payoff matrix?arrow_forward
- Suppose a country's mobile phone industry is supplied by only two firms (i.e. an oligopoly). Explain how the presence of two firms affects the price elasticity of demand of each firm's output.arrow_forwardIn 1983, Motorola accounted for seventy five percent of the mobile phone market. But by 2019, its market share had shrunk to just 2.2%. In 1983, the Motorola launched one of the world’s first commercially available mobile phones—the DynaTAC 8000X. Motorola went on to launch a few more devices over the next few years and quickly became a dominant player in the emerging industry. In the early days of the market, the company’s only serious competitor was Finnish multinational Nokia. By the mid-1990s, other competitors like Sony and Siemens started to gain some solid footing, which chipped away at Motorola’s dominance. In September 1995, the company’s market share was down to 32.1%. By January 1999, Nokia surpassed Motorola as the leading mobile phone manufacturer, accounting for 21.4% of global market share. That put it just slightly ahead of Motorola’s 20.8%. Describe the market for mobile phones in 1983 and illustrate how equilibrium price and quantity determined in this industry and…arrow_forwardUse the orange points (square symbol) to plot the initial short-run industry supply curve when there are 10 firms in the market. (Hint: You can disregard the portion of the supply curve that corresponds to prices where there is no output since this is the industry supply curve.) Next, use the purple points (diamond symbol) to plot the short-run industry supply curve when there are 15 firms. Finally, use the green points (triangle symbol) to plot the short-run industry supply curve when there are 20 firms. PRICE (Dollars per pound) 100 90 80 70 80 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 125 250 375 500 825 750 875 1000 1125 1250 QUANTITY (Thousands of pounds) Demand Because you know that competitive firms earn Supply (10 firms) True Supply (15 firms) If there were 10 firms in this market, the short-run equilibrium price of rhodium would be $ would . Therefore, in the long run, firms would False Supply (20 firms) per pound. From the graph, you can see that this means there will be ? per pound. At that price,…arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning