Interpretation:
Predict the effect of change in concentration of the given reactants and products at equilibrium is to be predicted with the help of Le Chȃtelier’sprinciple.
Concept introduction:
Le Chȃtelier’sprinciple states that when equilibrium is subjected to change in concentration, pressure, or temperature, the system will shift in a direction to nullify that change.
When reactant is added at equilibrium, the equilibrium shifts in forward direction to nullify the effectby consuming the increased concentration of reactants and forming the products. If theproduct is addedat equilibrium, the equilibrium shifts in backward direction to nullify the effectthereby consuming the increased concentration of productsand forming the reactants.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 15 Solutions
Pearson eText -- Introductory Chemistry -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
- need help not sure what am doing wrong step by step please answer is 971A During the lecture, we calculated the Debye length at physiological salt concentrations and temperature, i.e. at an ionic strength of 150 mM (i.e. 0.150 mol/l) and a temperature of T=310 K. We predicted that electrostatic interactions are effectively screened beyond distances of 8.1 Å in solutions with a physiological salt concentration. What is the Debye length in a sample of distilled water with an ionic strength of 10.0 µM (i.e. 1.00 * 10-5 mol/l)? Assume room temperature, i.e. T= 298 K, and provide your answer as a numerical expression with 3 significant figures in Å (1 Å = 10-10 m).arrow_forwardInfluence of salt concentrations on electrostatic interactions 2 Answer is 2.17A why not sure step by step please What is the Debye length in a concentrated salt solution with an ionic strength of 2.00 mol/l? Assume room temperature, i.e. T= 298 K, and provide your answer as a numerical expression with 3 significant figures in Å (1 Å = 10-10 m).arrow_forwardThe name of the following molecule is: Νarrow_forward
- The table shows the tensile stress-strain values obtained for various hypothetical metals. Based on this, indicate which is the most brittle and which is the most tough (or most resistant). Breaking strength Elastic modulus Material Yield strength Tensile strength Breaking strain A (MPa) 415 (MPa) (MPa) (GPa) 550 0.15 500 310 B 700 850 0.15 720 300 C Non-effluence fracture 650 350arrow_forwardPlease correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardMaterials. The following terms are synonyms: tension, effort and stress.arrow_forward
- Please correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardPlease correct answer and don't used hand raitingarrow_forwardThe table shows the tensile stress-strain values obtained for various hypothetical metals. Based on this, indicate which material will be the most ductile and which the most brittle. Material Yield strength Tensile strength Breaking strain Breaking strength Elastic modulus (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (GPa) A 310 340 0.23 265 210 B 100 120 0.40 105 150 с 415 550 0.15 500 310 D 700 850 0.14 720 210 E - Non-effluence fracture 650 350arrow_forward
- ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: An Atoms First ApproachChemistryISBN:9781305079243Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. ZumdahlPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Chemistry: The Molecular ScienceChemistryISBN:9781285199047Author:John W. Moore, Conrad L. StanitskiPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry & Chemical ReactivityChemistryISBN:9781133949640Author:John C. Kotz, Paul M. Treichel, John Townsend, David TreichelPublisher:Cengage LearningChemistry: Principles and PracticeChemistryISBN:9780534420123Author:Daniel L. Reger, Scott R. Goode, David W. Ball, Edward MercerPublisher:Cengage Learning