
Sub part (a):
The nominal and real
Sub part (a):

Explanation of Solution
The GDP is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year. There are two different ways of calculating the GDP of the economy and they are the real GDP and the nominal GDP. The real GDP is the GDP calculated at the constant prices. There will be a base
The nominal GDP of the economy can be calculated by multiplying the quantity produced by the per unit price of the commodity. The quantity produced and price in 2013 was 100 quarts of milk and 50 quarts of honey. The prices were $1 and $2 respectively, for each quart. Thus, the nominal GDP of 2013 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the nominal GDP of 2013 is $200.
Similarly, the quantity produced and price in 2014 was 200 quarts of milk and 100 quarts of honey. The prices were $1 and $2, respectively. Thus, the nominal GDP of 2014 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the nominal GDP of 2014 is $400.
Similarly, the quantity produced in 2015 was 200 quarts of milk and 100 quarts of honey but the prices increased to $2 and $4, respectively. Thus, the nominal GDP of 2015 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the nominal GDP of 2015 is $800.
The real GDP can be calculated by multiplying the quantity produced with the base year price level. Since the base year is 2013, the nominal GDP of 2013 will be equal to the real GDP of 2013, which is equal to $200.
In the case of 2014, the real GDP can be calculated by multiplying the 2014 quantity with the 2013 price as follows:
Thus, the real GDP of 2014 is $400.
In the case of 2015, the real GDP can be calculated by multiplying the 2015 quantity with the 2013 price. Since there is no change in the quantity produced in 2015 and 2014 in the two commodities of milk and honey, there will be no change in the real GDP of the two years and thus, the real GDP of 2015 will be the same as 2014, which is $400.
The GDP deflator is the implicit price deflator. It can be calculated by dividing the nominal GDP with the real GDP and multiplying the value with 100 as follows:
Thus, by substituting the values of nominal and real GDP in the equation, we can calculate the GDP deflator as follows:
Thus, the GDP deflator in 2013 is 100. Similarly, the GDP deflator for 2014 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the GDP deflator in 2014 is also 100.
The GDP deflator for 2015 can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the GDP deflator in 2015 is 200.
These values can be tabulated as follows:
Table 1
Year | Nominal GDP | Real GDP | GDP Deflator |
2013 | $200 | $200 | 100 |
2014 | $400 | $400 | 100 |
2015 | $800 | $400 | 200 |
Concept introduction:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): It is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year.
GDP deflator: It is an implicit price deflator.
Sub part (b):
The Percentage change in nominal and real GDP and GDP deflator.
Sub part (b):

Explanation of Solution
The percentage change in nominal GDP can be calculated by the following formula:
Thus, by substituting the values for the current year and previous year, we can calculate the percentage change in the nominal GDP as follows:
Thus, the percentage change in nominal GDP of 2014 is 100 percent.
Thus, the percentage change in nominal GDP of 2015 is also 100 percent.
Similarly, the percentage change in real GDP and GDP deflator can be calculated as follows:
The percentage change in real GDP of 2014 is 100 percent.
The percentage change in real GDP of 2015 is 0 percent.
The percentage change in the GDP deflator can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the percentage change in GDP deflator of 2014 is 0 percent.
Thus, the percentage change in GDP deflator of 2015 is 100 percent.
The prices in the economy remain the same in the year 2013 and 2014, which leads to no change in the percentage change in the GDP deflator. This is why the GDP deflator percentage change is zero. Similarly, the output levels remain the same in the years 2014 and 2015, which leads to the value of percentage change in the real GDP to remain at zero.
Concept introduction:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): It is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year.
GDP deflator: It is an implicit price deflator.
Sub part (c):
Economic well-being.
Sub part (c):

Explanation of Solution
The economic well-being increased much larger in the year of 2014, when compared to 2013 and 2015. This result is obtained from the analysis of the data that the real GDP remained the same in 2015 as the real GDP in the 2014. Thus, there were no changes in the real GDP after 2014. But after 2013, the real GDP increased from $200 to $400 in 2014. This means that the well-being rose more in 2014. Another reason why the well-being didn’t rise in 2015 was the price hike. The output remained the same, whereas prices doubled.
Concept introduction:
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): It is the summation of the monetary value of all the goods and services produced within the political boundary of a country, within a financial year.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 15 Solutions
EBK ESSENTIALS OF ECONOMICS
- Not use aiarrow_forwardProblem 3 Stata Output Analysis Suppose a study investigates the causal effect of education on wages. Table 1 reports the results of an OLS regression of wages (wage per hour in dollars) on education (years in education). Table 1 Source SS df MS Number of obs = 3,017 F(1, 3015) = 298.39 Model Residual 18904467 191011981 1 18904467 3,015 63353.8909 Prob > F 0.0000 R-squared 0.0901 Adj R-squared 0.0898 Total 209916448 3,016 69600.9444 Root MSE 251.7 wage Coef. Std. Err. t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] education cons 29.56644 183.9342 1.711605 23.15976 17.27 0.000 7.94 0.000 26.21041 138.5237 32.92247 229.3447 a. How would you write this relationship using the Core Model? (5 points) b. What is the value for B₁, the coefficient on Education? (2 points) C. What is the standard error of ẞ₁? (2 points) d. What is the R squared for the model? (2 points) e. What is the t statistic for ₁at the 5% level of significance? (2 points) Λ f. What is the 95% confidence interval for B₁? (2 points) Λ g.…arrow_forwardProblem 2 Hypothesis Testing Suppose you are interested in the effect of neighborhood crime incidents on high school graduation rates. You run the following regression model: Graduation; ßo+ß₁Crime; +ɛ¿ = You would like to test whether the neighborhood crime incidents have a statistically significant effect on high school graduation rate at the 5% level of significance (α = 0.05). You estimate the model and find that B₁ = -0.04 and se (B₁) = 0.008. a. Write down the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. (4 points) b. Calculate thet statistic of B₁. (5 points) C. What is the critical value of thet statistic for the 5% level of significance? (2 points) d. Calculate the 95% confidence interval for the coefficient on Crime? (6 points) e. Based on your answers to the questions b, c, and d, do you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis you defined in question a? Justify your answer. (5 points) Λ f. Isẞ₁ statistically significant at the 5% level? (3 points)arrow_forward
- Problem 1 Endogeneity & Bias The ACT (an abbreviation of American College Testing) is a standardized test used for college admissions in the United States. Suppose you are interested in whether ACT preparation improves ACT scores. Consider the following model: ACT=B+B Preparation,+e; where Preparation measures the number of hours spent on ACT preparation and ACT is ACT scores. Each student is denoted by the subscript i. Suppose you estimate = - 21 andß₁ = 0.9. a. What is the dependent variable? What is the independent variable? (3 points) b. How do you interpret ẞ = 21 in this context? (4 points) 0 C. How do you interpretß₁ = 0.9 in this context? (4 points) 1 d. Describe a scenario which can cause the independent variable to be endogenous. (4 points)arrow_forwardHow does mining raw materials fir tech companies like apple affect the humar right violation all over the worldarrow_forwardConsider the market for electricity. Suppose that a power plant dumps byproducts into a nearby river, creating a negative externality for those living downstream from the plant. Producing additional electricity imposes a constant per-unit external cost of $490. The following graph shows the demand (private value) curve and the supply (private cost) curve for electricity. Use the purple points (diamond symbol) to plot the social cost curve when the external cost is $490 per unit. PRICE (Dollars per unit of electricity) 1400 1260 1120 980 840 700 560 420 280 140 ° D 1 2 3 D Supply (Private Cost) Demand (Private Value) 5 6 7 QUANTITY (Units of electricity) Social Cost The market equilibrium quantity is units of electricity, but the socially optimal quantity of electricity production is units. To create an incentive for the firm to produce the socially optimal quantity of electricity, the government could impose a unit of electricity. perarrow_forward
- How do mining of raw materials for a tech industry affects the human rights in the worldarrow_forwardAssume the Federal Interstate Commission began the fiscal year with the following account balances: FEDERAL INTERSTATE COMMISSION Trial BalanceOctober 1, 2020 Debits Credits Fund Balance with Treasury$810,000 Supplies 107,000 Equipment 1, 370,000 Accumulated Depreciation $484,000 Accounts Payable 130,000 Wages Payable 85,000Cumulative Results of Operations 1,588,000 $2,287,000 $2,287,000 Congress passed a spending bill providing $17,200, 000 to fund the agency's operations for the year. During the first quarter the commission processed the following items for payment (all items were paid by Treasury in the first quarter). Accounts payable$130,000 Wages payable 85,000 Salaries and benefits 507,000 Supplies 524,000 Contracted services 2,200,000 Grants 1,020,000 Equipment 620,000 Total$5,086,000 Unpaid wages at the end of the quarter totaled $37,000. In addition to the items paid in item 2, the commission received supplies of $24,000 and contracted services of $82,000 that are to be…arrow_forwardnot use aiarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Principles and Policy (MindTap Co...EconomicsISBN:9781305280601Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. BlinderPublisher:Cengage Learning





