To describe:The velocity for each year.
Answer to Problem 2TY
The velocity of each year is shown in the following table.
There is a consistent fall in velocity of money during 2006 to 2009, but there is no consistency in trend during 1975 to 1985
Explanation of Solution
The velocity of money indicates how often the overall supply of money circulated in a given period of time in the economy.
Calculation of money's velocity:
Money demand and money supply can be described as follows:
MV=PY....... (1)
M is the money supply
V is the velocity of the money
P is the price level
Y is the total output
MV is the supply of money
PY is the demand for money
Equation (1) can be written as,
Equation (2), PY represents the
M represents to money base.
So, the equation can be written as,
Now, the table represents the money supply and GDP of US for different years.
Year | Money Supply | GDP |
2006 | 1,367 | 13,399 |
2007 | 1,375 | 14,062 |
2008 | 1,602 | 14,369 |
2009 | 1,697 | 14,119 |
U.S.velocity of money in the year 2006
Substitute the 2006 money supply and GDP in equation (3) to obtain the velocity of money for the U.S. This can be written as,
Therefore, the velocity of money for the U.S.in 2006 was 9.8
U.S.velocity of money in the year 2007
Substitute the 2007 money supply and GDP in equation (3) to obtain the velocity of money for the U.S.This can be written as,
Therefore, the velocity of money for the U.S. in 2007 was 10.23
U.S. velocity of money in the year 2008
Substitute the 2008 money supply and GDP in equation (3) to obtain the velocity of money for the United States. This can be written as,
Therefore, the velocity of money for the United States in 2007 was 8.97
U.S. velocity of money in the year 2009
Substitute the 2009 money supply and GDP in equation (3) to obtain the velocity of money for the U.S. This can be written as,
Therefore, the velocity of money for the United States in 2009 was 8.32
U.S. money supply, GDP and velocity of money for different years is shown in the following tables.
Year | GDP | M1 money supply | |
1975 | 1,663.70 | 287.1 | 5.79 |
1976 | 1824.1 | 306.2 | 5.96 |
1977 | 2,030.10 | 330.9 | 6.14 |
1978 | 2293.8 | 357.3 | 6.42 |
1979 | 2,562.20 | 381.8 | 6.71 |
1980 | 2,788.10 | 408.5 | 6.83 |
1981 | 3,126.80 | 436.7 | 7.16 |
1982 | 3,253.20 | 521.4 | 6.78 |
1983 | 3,534.60 | 521.4 | 6.78 |
1984 | 3,930.90 | 551.6 | 7.13 |
1985 | 4,217.50 | 619.8 | 6.8 |
1986 | 4,460.10 | 724.7 | 6.15 |
1987 | 4,736.40 | 750.2 | 6.31 |
1988 | 5,100.40 | 786.7 | 6.48 |
1989 | 5,482.10 | 792.9 | 6.91 |
1990 | 5,800.50 | 824.7 | 7.03 |
1991 | 5,992.10 | 897 | 6.68 |
1992 | 6,342.30 | 1,024.90 | 6.19 |
1993 | 6,667.40 | 1,129.60 | 5.9 |
1994 | 7,085.20 | 1,150.60 | 6.16 |
1995 | 7,414.70 | 1,127.50 | 6.58 |
Comparing the velocity of money between 1975 to 1985 and 2006 to 2009,
There is a consistent fall in velocity of money during 2006 to 2009, but there is no consistency in trend during 1975 to 1985.
Introduction:M1 money supply is the total circulating amount of money and savings with banks and other saving institutions bodies.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
- Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy (MindTap Co...EconomicsISBN:9781305280601Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. BlinderPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning