(a)
Case summary: Company S contracted with the company F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which the company S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.
To find:Meaning of revocation of acceptance and its use by the buyer.
Case summary: S contracted with F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.
To find:The use of the revocation of acceptance by the buyer as a ground to recover damages.
(b)
Case summary : S contracted with F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.
To find: The ethical dimension in the cases of revocation of acceptance.
Case summary : S contracted with F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.
To find: The ethical limits to the right of revocation of acceptance.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 14 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases
- Zucker purchased a mobile phone that included LookUP’s software, a database product containing information from 3,000 telephone directories. Every mobile phone sold with the LookUP software was wrapped in plastic shrinkwrap and prominently featured text notifying buyers that an enclosed license restricted use of the LookUP software product. After removing the cellophane cover and opening the mobile phone box, buyers could access the printed LookUP license. Moreover, consumers could not use the LookUP software product without first accepting the license posted on the screen. This license prohibited buyers from using the database commercially. Zucker, a college student, bought a mobile phone with LookUP software and then resold the database’s information on the internet to make some extra money for tuition. LookUP sued Zucker, who argued that the license did not apply to him because he never agreed to it. Zucker claimed the phone he purchased was not wrapped in plastic and was presented…arrow_forwardhelparrow_forwardBart Inc. developed a new medical rub called “NoPain Muscular Rub” that can be used in the event of muscular back pains. Bart Inc. via an online advertisement stated that they are willing to pay $5,000 to anyone who used their muscle rub “Nopain” for one week and still suffers from back pains thereafter. Bill who suffers from back pains, saw the online advertisement and decided to purchase “NoPain Muscular Rub”. He used it for a full week, but nevertheless still suffered from back pains. Based on the fact that the muscular rub “Nopain” did not relieve his back pains, he sued Bart Inc. for the monies that were promised. However, Bart Inc. argued that the advertisement was not an offer, but an invitation to invite offers. They further argued that at no point in time did Bill make an offer and as such, they are not bound to pay him any monies, since the parties did not create any binding agreement. Advised Bill on his legal options stating relevant case law as well as using the IRAC…arrow_forward
- Salesperson Sam works for Broker Bob. Broker Bob discovers that Salesperson Sam has been receiving referral fees for every referral Sam made to Acme Mortgage Lenders. Acme's actions are:arrow_forwardGardner-Denver is the largest manufacturer of ratchet wrenches and their replacement parts in the United States. Gardner-Denver had two different lists of prices for its wrenches and parts. Its blue list had parts that, if purchased in quantities of five or more, were available for substantially less than its white list prices 1 - Purport 2 - Did Gardner-Denver engage in price discrimination with its two price lists? 3- Assuming that Gardner-Denver has engaged in price discrimination, what law would be violated in such situation? 4- Which agency of the federal government is responsible to investigate cases that may involve price discrimination?arrow_forwardThe Customer Service Department of Grand Lakes Technologies asked the Publications Department to prepare a brochure for its training program. The Publications Department delivered the brochures and charged the Customer Service Department a rate that was 25% higher than could be obtained from an outside printing company. The policy of the company required the Customer Service Department to use the internal publications group for brochures. The Publications Department claimed that it had a drop in demand for its services during the fiscal year, so it had to charge higher prices in order to recover its payroll and fixed costs. Should the cost of the brochure be transferred to the Customer Service Department in order to hold the department head accountable for the cost of the brochure? What changes in policy would you recommend?arrow_forward
- Time Inc. offers to sell to Unlimited Sales Company one hundred digital watches at $50 a piece, subject to certain specific delivery dates. Unlimited replies with a signed purchase order that reads, “Accept your offer for 100 watches at $50 each. Must be delivered to our warehouse.” Time does not respond or deliver the goods. Unlimited files a suit for breach of contract, to which Time answers that there is no contract because Unlimited’s purchase order contained additional terms and is not signed by Time. A valid contract exists and the additional terms ("must be delivered to our warehouse") becomes part of the contract. A) True B) Falsearrow_forwardSpaulding & Kimball Co. ordered from Aetna Chemical Co. 75 cartons of window washers. The buyer received them and sold about a third to its customers but later refused to pay for them, claiming that the quality was poor. The seller sued for the price. Would the seller be entitled to the contract price?arrow_forwardThe Case: Ben purchased a used Laptop from Smart store during the sales period. He asked the salesperson, Rodny, if the Laptop had ever been damaged. Rodny (the salesperson) had never seen the Laptop before that morning and knew nothing of its history but quickly answered Ben’s question by stating: ‘No. It has never been damaged’. In fact, the Laptop had been seriously damaged previously and, although repaired and bought during the sales, it was worth much less than the value Ben had paid. When Ben learned the truth, he wanted to return the Laptop. Smart store replied that he cannot do that because they have a legally binding agreement and as per the agreement the items purchased during the sales cannot be returned. Questions: A) Does the behavior of the salesperson, Rodny, constitute deception? If it constitutes deception please precise which type of deception and explain in detail all the elements of the type of deception selected. B) Decide, based on the analysis made under…arrow_forward
- Mary, a keen pottery collector, saw a notice for an auction at James Pottery Limited on September 30th 2017 in the Daily News. She traveled 300 kilometers to attend the auction in order to bid for a particularly rare item of Mozart pottery, specifically mentioned in the list of items to be auctioned. However, when she got to the auction site she found a notice outside, stating that the auction had been canceled. Mary went into a nearby antique shop and saw an item of the same type of pottery she had come to bid for, which the price ticket stated $5000. Mary indicated to the shop owner, Anthony, that she was only willing to pay $4,000 for it. However, Anthony said he would sell it for $4,500. Mary then indicated to him that she would like time to think about it over lunch; Anthony thereafter, agreed not to sell it before Mary returned. However, when Mary returned to buy the pottery, she found that Anthony had already sold it to someone else, who had paid $4500 for it. In the context…arrow_forward(a) Under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), what is misleading and deceptive conduct and how does it differ from puffery? (b) Provide two real-world examples of puffery that wouldn't be a breach of ACL:arrow_forwardLocal camping supply store, Happy Campers, has been sued by an angry customer for breaching ACL s 54. According to the customer, Happy Campers sold her a pair of hiking boots that broke soon after she started wearing them. According to Happy Campers, the customer was told that the shoes were discounted because they were defective. Required: You have been asked to interpret ACL s 54, and to help Happy Campers understand if it has a valid defence.arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education