EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337516051
Author: Miller
Publisher: YUZU
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 14, Problem 9BCP

(a)

Summary Introduction

Case summary: Company S contracted with the company F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which the company S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.

To find:Meaning of revocation of acceptance and its use by the buyer.

Summary Introduction

Case summary: S contracted with F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.

To find:The use of the revocation of acceptance by the buyer as a ground to recover damages.

(b)

Summary Introduction

Case summary : S contracted with F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.

To find: The ethical dimension in the cases of revocation of acceptance.

Summary Introduction

Case summary : S contracted with F to provide flakes of calcium chloride. After 1 month of delivery F started to complain about the quality issues of flakes shipped, to which S assured for quality maintenance. Later F sued S for rest of the payment. S contended the suit on the basis of breach of contract and revocation of acceptance.

To find: The ethical limits to the right of revocation of acceptance.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
1. Happy Farms, Inc. ordered 1,000 gallons of a specialty pesticide, “Berry Good,” for its berry crop. The total price of the order was $15,000. Happy Farms paid $5,000 up front and promised to pay the balance upon delivery. JA changed the order to a newer product “Very Berry Good” without notice to or consents from Happy Farms. Upon delivery, the head farmer at Happy Farms, Allison Kagan, noted that the product was not the same as she ordered. Later that afternoon, Kagan notified JA that the pesticide was not what she had ordered and refused to pay the balance on the shipment. Happy Farms held the boxes of pesticide, but, to date, JA has not retrieved them. What are JA’s legal options in this situation? 2. Martin Rupe worked as the manager of one of JA’s retail outlets. A customer came in and offered to buy all remaining “Berry Good” pesticide for…
As part of its business, Kinko’s Graphics Corporation (Kinko’s) copied excerpts from books, compiled them in “packets,” and sold the packets to college students. Kinko’s did this without permission from the owners of the copyrights to the books and without paying copyright fees or royalties. Kinko’s has more than two hundred stores nationwide and reported $15 million in assets and $3 million in profits for 1989. Basic Books, Harper & Row, John Wiley & Sons, and others (plaintiffs) sued Kinko’s for violation of the Copyright Act of 1976. Plaintiffs owned copyrights to the works copied and sold by Kinko’s and derived substantial income from royalties. They argued that Kinko’s had infringed on their copyrights by copying excerpts from their books and selling the copies to college students for profit. Kinko’s admitted that it had copied excerpts without permission and had sold them in packets to students, but it contended that its actions constituted a fair use of the works in…
Jane Jackson purchased a sealed can of Katydids, chocolate-covered pecan caramel candies manufac- tured by NestlT. Shortly after, Jackson bit into one of the candies and allegedly broke a tooth on a pecan shell embedded in the candy. She filed a complaint, asserting breach of implied warranty. How would you argue on behalf of the company? How would you argue on behalf of Jackson? In your answer, discuss both the reasonable expectation test and the foreign substance/natural substance test.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Introduction to Business
Business
ISBN:9781947172548
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Text book image
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Bcom
Business
ISBN:9780357026595
Author:LEHMAN, Carol M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,