
The way by which the tax structure affects the decision of a person to immigrate into the nation or emigrate out of the nation. And the reasoning applied, if ocean or rivers separates the two countries.
Introduction:
Marginal income tax rate: It is defined as the amount of tax which is paid on every external dollar of income. When the income rises, the marginal tax rate of a person also rises. This means that the person with low income are taxed low and those with high income are taxed high.
Federal income tax rate: It is a type of progressive tax which is imposed by the federal government, states, and the local body in the United States. This means that as the income increases, the tax rate also increases.
Explanation:
Country A:
Given,
The yearly income is $40,000.
Tax rate is 20%.
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 20% for tax rate and $40,000 for yearly income.
Tax bill of person earning $100,000 is,
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 20% for tax rate and $100,000 for yearly income.
Country B:
Given,
The yearly income is $40,000.
Tax rate is 10%.
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 10% for tax rate and $40,000 for yearly income.
Tax bill of person earning $40,000 at 10% tax rate and $60,000 at 40% tax rate is,
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 10% for tax rate 1, 40% for tax rate 2.
- Thus, the tax bill in country A with $40,000 or less income is more than the tax bill in country B with same income. The tax bill in country A with $100,000 or more income is less in country A as compared to B with the same income.
- If the language, culture and climates of the country are same and if an individual can choose to live on one side or the other side of a river separating the two countries, then the person with a yearly income of more than $40,000 will choose to live in country A because the taxes charged there are less as compared to country B.
- On the other hand, one with less than $40,000 income will choose to live in country B as compared to country A.
- If instead of river,even an ocean would have divided the two countries, then the result would remain the same. The person with yearly income of more than $40,000 will choose to live in country A because the taxes charged are less as compared to country B. On the other hand, one with less than $40,000 income will choose to live in country B as compared to country A.
- Migrating to another country incurs time, cost like transportation, and finding a home to live. These costs are fixed and once the person gets settled, there would be no additional cost.
- If the language, culture, and the climates of the countries are different, then there is no chance of migration. It is very difficult to settle in a place that has different culture, language, and climate because along with migration cost there is an external social cost. Hence, an individual would not migrate, as the social cost is more important than monetary cost.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 14 Solutions
Economics of Public Issues (20th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
- Consider a firm facing conventional production technology. The short run Production Function has a small range of increasing marginal product (increasing marginal returns) and then is subject to the Law of Diminishing Marginal Product (diminishing marginal returns). A. Putting quantity on the horizontal axis and dollars on the vertical axis, depict three important curves: Fixed Cost (FC), Variable Cost (VC), and Total Cost (TC). (Note that we are not asking you to depict average cost functions!) B. Please clearly indicate on this graph the range of quantities where the firm is experiencing (1) increasing marginal product and (2) diminishing marginal product. C. In a few sentences, please justify why you've made this specific classification of increasing/diminishing marginal product in part (b).arrow_forwardplease answer the following questions: What is money, and why does anyone want it? Explain the concept of the opportunity cost of holding money . Explain why an increase in U.S. interest rates relative to UK interest rates would affect the U.S.-UK exchange rate. Suppose that a person’s wealth is $50,000 and that her yearlyincome is $60,000. Also suppose that her money demand functionis given by Md = $Y10.35 - i2Derive the demand for bonds. Suppose the interest rate increases by 10 percentage points. What is the effect on her demand for bonds?b. What are the effects of an increase in income on her demand for money and her demand for bonds? Explain in wordsarrow_forwardDriving Quiz X My Course G city place w x D2L Login - Univ X D2L Login - Univ x D2L Login - U acmillanlearning.com/ihub/assessment/f188d950-dd73-11e0-9572-0800200c9a66/4db68a5e-69bb-4767-8d6c-a12d +1687 pts /1800 © Macmillan Learning Question 6 of 18 > The graph shows the average total cost (ATC) curve, the marginal cost (MC) curve, the average variable cost (AVC) curve, and the marginal revenue (MR) curve (which is also the market price) for a perfectly competitive firm that produces terrible towels. Answer the three questions, assuming that the firm is profit-maximizing and does not shut down in the short run. What is the firm's total revenue? S What is the firm's total cost? $ What is the firm's profit? (Enter a negative number for a loss.) $ Price $320 $300 $200 $150 205 260 336 365 Quantity MC ATC AVC MR=Parrow_forward
- 1. Suppose that the two nations face the following benefits of pollution, B, and costs of abatement, C: BN = 10, Bs = 7; CN = 5, Cs = 4. Further assume that if the nation chooses to abate pollution, it still receives the benefits of pollution but now must pay the cost of abatement as well. a. Identify the payoffs that accrue to each nation under the four different possible outcomes of the game and present these payoffs in the normal form of the game. b. Recall that the term dominant strategy defines the condition that a player in a game would prefer to play that strategy (in this case either pollute or abate) regardless of the strategy chosen by the other player in the game. Does either nation have a dominant strategy in this game? If so, what is it? c. Identify the Nash equilibria, or non-cooperative equilibria, of this game.arrow_forwardagrody calming Inted 001 and me 2. A homeowner is concerned about the various air pollutants (e.g., benzene and methane) released in her house when she cooks with natural gas. She is considering replacing her gas oven and stove with an electric stove comprising an induction cooktop and convection oven. The new appliance costs $900 to purchase and install. Capping the old gas line costs an additional $150 (a one-time fee). The old line must be inspected for leaks each year after capping, at a cost of $35 for each inspection. a. If the homeowner plans to remain in the house for four more years and the discount rate is 4%, what is the minimum present value of the benefits that the homeowner would need to experience for this purchase to be justified based on its private net sub present value? b. While trying to understand how she might express the value of reduced exposure to indoor air pollutants in dollar terms, the homeowner consulted the EPA website and found estimates provided by…arrow_forwardAfter the ban is imposed, Joe’s firm switches to the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups. This increases the cost associated with each cup of coffee it produces. Which cost curve(s) will be impacted by the use of the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups? Why? Which cost curve(s) will not shift, and why not? Please use the table below to answer this question. For the second column (“Impacted? If so, how?”), please use one of the following three choices: No shift; Shifts up (i.e., increases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes up); or Shifts down (i.e., decreases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes down). $ Cost Curve Impacted? If so, how? Explanation of the Shift: Why or Why Not AFC No shift. Fix costs stay the same, regardless of quantity. Fixed cost is calculated as Fixed Cost/Quantity. Since fixed costs remain unchanged, AFC stays the same for each quantity. MC Shifts up. Since the biodegradable cups are more expensive, the…arrow_forward
- Styrofoam is non-biodegradable and is not easily recyclable. Many cities and at least one state have enacted laws that ban the use of polystyrene containers. These locales understand that banning these containers will force many businesses to turn to other more expensive forms of packaging and cups, but argue the ban is environmentally important. Shane owns a firm with a conventional production function resulting in U-shaped ATC, AVC, and MC curves. Shane's business sells takeout food and drinks that are currently packaged in styrofoam containers and cups. Graph the short-run AFC0, AVC0, ATC0, and MC0 curves for Shane's firm before the ban on using styrofoam containers.arrow_forwardd-farrow_forwarda-c pleasearrow_forward
- d-farrow_forwardPART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forwardOnly #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





