The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $ / cm 3 . Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained. Concept Introduction: Specific strength can be calculated as follows: Specific strength = strength Mass density It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

(a) For the circuit shown in Figure Q3(a) (RFC and Cc are forbias) (i) (ii) Draw the AC small signal equivalent circuit of the oscillator. From this equivalent circuit derive an equation for fo and the gain condition for the oscillations to start. VDD www RG eee RFC H Cc 北 5 C₁ L 000 C₂ Vo

Please solve this question step by step handwritten solution and do not use chat gpt or any ai toolsfor part ii) you may need to use nodal analysis

PLEASE SOLVE THE QUESTIONS IN THE PICTURE, make sure you show all of your work please. Thank you for your help!

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Answer 6

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Answer 7

Chapter 14, Problem 14.1P

Interpretation Introduction

Interpretation:

The cost of material per unit volume is more important in some cases than the cost per unit weight. The cost needs to be determined in terms of $/cm3. Whether this affects the relationship between the different materials or not needs to be explained.

Concept Introduction:

Specific strength can be calculated as follows:

Specific strength = strength Mass density

It relates the specific strengths of steel, few high strength non-ferrous alloys, and polymer- matrix composites. Additional factor to study in designing with non-ferrous material is their rate, which also differs significantly.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

Table no.1

Metal	Density(g/ cm3)	Cost per kg($/kg)	Rank

Steels	7.87	0.22	1
Zinc	7.13	0.88	2
Lead	11.36	0.99	3
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	4
Copper	8.93	1.57	5
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	7
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9
Beryllium	1.85	777.60	10

The cost of a material per unit volume can be converted from ($/kg) to ($/g) by dividing the cost of material by 1000, and multiplying the converted cost value with density.

Table no. 2

Metal	Density	Cost per kg	Cost per gram	Cost per volume	Rank

Steel	7.87	0.22	0.22 ×10−3	0.0017	1
Aluminium	2.70	1.32	1.32 ×10−3	0.0036	2
Magnesium	1.74	3.31	3.31 ×10−3	0.0057	3
Zinc	7.13	0.88	0.88 ×10−3	0.0063	4
Lead	11.36	0.99	0.99 ×10−3	0.0013	5
Copper	8.93	1.57	1.57 ×10−3	0.0140	6
Titanium	4.51	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.0397	7
Nickel	8.90	9.04	9.04 ×10−3	0.0804	8
Tungsten	19.25	8.82	8.82 ×10−3	0.1696	9
Beryllium	1.85	771.60	771.60 ×10−3	1.4247	10

From the above two tables, the different materials are related to each other in terms of cost per kilogram and cost per volume.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.1P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.2P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.3P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.4P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.5P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.6P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.7P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.8P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.9P Ch. 14 - Prob. 14.10P

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 14 Solutions