Subpart (a):
Calculate the marginal cost, average total cost , variable cost and total cost.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the value of the
Table -1
Quantity | Average variable cost |
1 | 1 |
2 | 2 |
3 | 3 |
4 | 4 |
5 | 5 |
6 | 6 |
The variable cost can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the variable cost.
Thus, the variable cost is $1.
Table -2 shows the value of the variable cost obtained by using Equation (1).
Table -2
Quantity | Average variable cost | Variable cost |
1 | 1 | 1 |
2 | 2 | 4 |
3 | 3 | 9 |
4 | 4 | 16 |
5 | 5 | 25 |
6 | 6 | 36 |
The total cost can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to calculate the total cost.
Thus, the total cost is $17.
Table -3 shows the value of the total cost obtained by using Equation (2).
Table – 3
Quantity | Average variable cost | Variable cost | Total cost |
1 | 1 | 1 | 17 |
2 | 2 | 4 | 20 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 25 |
4 | 4 | 16 | 32 |
5 | 5 | 25 | 41 |
6 | 6 | 36 | 52 |
The marginal cost can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (3) to calculate the marginal cost.
Thus, the marginal cost is $3.
Table -4 shows the value of the marginal cost obtained by using Equation (3).
Table -4
Quantity | Average variable cost | Variable cost | Total cost | Marginal cost |
1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | – |
2 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 3 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 25 | 5 |
4 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 7 |
5 | 5 | 25 | 41 | 9 |
6 | 6 | 36 | 52 | 11 |
The average total cost can be calculated by using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (4) to calculate the average total cost.
Thus, the average total cost is $17.
Table -5 shows the value of the average total cost obtained by using Equation (4).
Table -5
Quantity | Average variable cost | Variable cost | Total cost | Marginal cost | Average total cost |
1 | 1 | 1 | 17 | – | 17 |
2 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 3 | 10 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 25 | 5 | 8.33 |
4 | 4 | 16 | 32 | 7 | 8 |
5 | 5 | 25 | 41 | 9 | 8.20 |
6 | 6 | 36 | 52 | 11 | 8.67 |
Concept introduction:
Marginal cost: Marginal cost refers to the additional cost incurred from producing one more additional unit of output.
Average total cost: The average total cost is the total cost per unit of the output produced by a firm.
Average variable cost: Average variable cost refers to the variable cost per unit.
Average total cost: Average total cost refers to the total cost per unit.
Subpart (b):
Total supply in the market.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Suppose the
Concept introduction:
Supply: Supply refers to the total value of the goods and services that are available for the purchase at a particular price in a given period of time.
Subpart (c):
Long run profit.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
In the long-run, a firm can enter or exit the market. In this transition, when a firm enters the market, price will still fall at the minimum average total cost. Since the market price is $10, which is higher than the minimum of the average total cost of $8. So, the new firm’s entry will result in a decrease in the price level. When the price decreases, the quantity demand will increase. Also, the quantity of the supply decreases because the newly entered firm will continue to produce only when the price equals the average total cost. So, beyond that equilibrium state the firm will produce zero
Concept introduction:
Long run: Thelong run refers to the time, which changes the production variable to adjust to the market situation.
Subpart (d):
Long run supply.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
Figure – 1 shows the long-run supply curve for the market.
From the above figure, the x-axis represents the quantity of output and the y-axis represents the price and cost.
Concept introduction:
Supply: Supply refers to the total value of the goods and services that are available for the purchase at a particular price in a given period of time.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 14 Solutions
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc