Given situation: Company H on Eminent 18, 2012, used a fifteen-year-old minor while the minor, locked in lifting daunting objects, injured his lower back. He underwent surgery in October 2012, to remove a herniated disk. Company H paid the correct amount of transitory payments up to disability increments ($53.36 per week) from Admirable 18, 2012, to November 15, 2013. The final settlement for 150 weeks of permanent half-way incapacity payments worth $6,136.40 came in February 2014. Under the arrangements that drive to understanding, Person T spoke to the company H and arranged directly with the minor and his mother HP. The overall interpretation of settlement was identified as being by the minor. Mrs. Parent, who was showing the marking at the time, did not challenge the marking, nor did she or someone else co-sign the statement. The minor subsequently tried to disaffirm the claim and reopen the stipend case for his staff. To discuss: The decision of the current scenario.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 14, Problem 12CP

Summary Introduction

Given situation:

Company H on Eminent 18, 2012, used a fifteen-year-old minor while the minor, locked in lifting daunting objects, injured his lower back. He underwent surgery in October 2012, to remove a herniated disk. Company H paid the correct amount of transitory payments up to disability increments ($53.36 per week) from Admirable 18, 2012, to November 15, 2013. The final settlement for 150 weeks of permanent half-way incapacity payments worth $6,136.40 came in February 2014.

Under the arrangements that drive to understanding, Person T spoke to the company H and arranged directly with the minor and his mother HP. The overall interpretation of settlement was identified as being by the minor. Mrs. Parent, who was showing the marking at the time, did not challenge the marking, nor did she or someone else co-sign the statement. The minor subsequently tried to disaffirm the claim and reopen the stipend case for his staff.

To discuss: The decision of the current scenario.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

1.Do you think evidence-based management seems like common sense? 2.Are there circumstances in which evidence-based management might not be the best approach? 3.Could automated evidence-based management ever replace human decision makers? 4.Would you want to work under Jack Welch’s system at General Electric?

1.Do you think evidence-based management seems like common sense? 2.Are there circumstances in which evidence-based management might not be the best approach? 3.Could automated evidence-based management ever replace human decision makers? 4.Would you want to work under Jack Welch’s system at General Electric? “Management decisions [should] be based on the best evidence, managers [should] systematically learn from experience, and organizational practices [should] reflect sound principles of thought and analysis.”

Discuss the Gate Keeper model's relevance in modern communication theory. Explain how the model applies to contemporary information dissemination and the challenges posed by digital media. Use intext-citation and references.