(a)
To calculate: Compactness of Earth.
Compactness of Earth is
Given:
Mass of Earth:
Radius of Earth:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
Substituting the given values we get-
Conclusion:
Compactness of Planet earth is
(b)
To calculate: Compactness of Sun.
Compactness of Sun is
Given:
Mass of Sun:
Radius of Sun:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
Substituting the given values we get-
Conclusion:
Compactness of Sun is
(c)
To calculate: Compactness of Neutron Star.
Compactness of Neutron Star is
Given:
Density of Star:
Radius of Star:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
Substituting the given values we get-
Since
Conclusion:
Compactness of Star is
(d)
To calculate: Compactness of Black hole.
Compactness of Black hole is1.
Given:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
According to question the Schwarzschild radius of black hole is comparable to its actual radius therefore
Conclusion:
Compactness of Black hole is
(b)
To calculate: Compactness of Sun.
Compactness of Sun is
Given:
Mass of Sun:
Radius of Sun:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
Substituting the given values we get-
Conclusion:
Compactness of Sun is
(c)
To calculate: Compactness of Neutron Star.
Compactness of Neutron Star is
Given:
Density of Star:
Radius of Star:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
Substituting the given values we get-
Since
Conclusion:
Compactness of Star is
(d)
To calculate: Compactness of Black hole.
Compactness of Black hole is1.
Given:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
According to question the Schwarzschild radius of black hole is comparable to its actual radius therefore
Conclusion:
Compactness of Black hole is
(c)
To calculate: Compactness of Neutron Star.
Compactness of Neutron Star is
Given:
Density of Star:
Radius of Star:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
Substituting the given values we get-
Since
Conclusion:
Compactness of Star is
(d)
To calculate: Compactness of Black hole.
Compactness of Black hole is1.
Given:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
According to question the Schwarzschild radius of black hole is comparable to its actual radius therefore
Conclusion:
Compactness of Black hole is
(d)
To calculate: Compactness of Black hole.
Compactness of Black hole is1.
Given:
Compactness is the ratio of Schwarzschild radius to Actual radius.
Formula used:
Schwarzschild radius
Calculation:
Let compactness be denoted by
According to question the Schwarzschild radius of black hole is comparable to its actual radius therefore
Conclusion:
Compactness of Black hole is

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 13 Solutions
FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS
- 20. Two small conducting spheres are placed on top of insulating pads. The 3.7 × 10-10 C sphere is fixed whie the 3.0 × 107 C sphere, initially at rest, is free to move. The mass of each sphere is 0.09 kg. If the spheres are initially 0.10 m apart, how fast will the sphere be moving when they are 1.5 m apart?arrow_forwardpls help on allarrow_forwardpls help on thesearrow_forward
- pls help on all asked questions kindlyarrow_forwardpls help on all asked questions kindlyarrow_forward19. Mount Everest, Earth's highest mountain above sea level, has a peak of 8849 m above sea level. Assume that sea level defines the height of Earth's surface. (re = 6.38 × 106 m, ME = 5.98 × 1024 kg, G = 6.67 × 10 -11 Nm²/kg²) a. Calculate the strength of Earth's gravitational field at a point at the peak of Mount Everest. b. What is the ratio of the strength of Earth's gravitational field at a point 644416m below the surface of the Earth to a point at the top of Mount Everest? C. A tourist watching the sunrise on top of Mount Everest observes a satellite orbiting Earth at an altitude 3580 km above his position. Determine the speed of the satellite.arrow_forward
- pls help on allarrow_forwardpls help on allarrow_forward6. As the distance between two charges decreases, the magnitude of the electric potential energy of the two-charge system: a) Always increases b) Always decreases c) Increases if the charges have the same sign, decreases if they have the opposite signs d) Increases if the charges have the opposite sign, decreases if they have the same sign 7. To analyze the motion of an elastic collision between two charged particles we use conservation of & a) Energy, Velocity b) Momentum, Force c) Mass, Momentum d) Energy, Momentum e) Kinetic Energy, Potential Energyarrow_forward
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax CollegeUniversity Physics Volume 1PhysicsISBN:9781938168277Author:William Moebs, Samuel J. Ling, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax - Rice University
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics Volume 3PhysicsISBN:9781938168185Author:William Moebs, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax





