(a)
Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. There was a condition mentioned in the contract that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid in case someone bought the property.
To find: Whether JS and JR are entitled to pay person T, even though she was not present to show the townhouse to the couple.
Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker voluntarily, went on and showed a townhouse to the couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T, due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.
To find: The obligation of the parties involved in the business deals.
Case summary: Person T, a real estate broker, voluntarily went on and showed a townhouse to a couple named JS and JR. The owner of the townhouse was R and H. In the absence of T due to some religious belief, JS and JR revisited the townhouse with an objective to purchase it and agreed to purchase on the same day. A condition was mentioned in the contract which clearly stated that the fees of the real estate broker would be paid by the buyer.
To find: The ways in which this situation could have been avoided.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 13 Solutions
Bundle: The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th + Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card
- 1. Wong, a Mathematics teacher made an advertisement in her facebook for Mathematics tuition with a ‘Money back guarantee for those who did not get an “A” in the SPM examination”. Shah enrolled his daughter, Teyha to Wong’s tuition class. When Teyha sat for the SPM examination, she obtained a “B” for her Mathematics paper. Shah went to see Wong and demanded that he return the tuition fees that he paid him. Wong refuses to return the fees to Shah. a. Advise Shah in this matters. b. In the course of your answer, explain FOUR (4) situations that may lead to invitation to treat. Support your answers with Contracts Act 1950 and decided cases.arrow_forwardWhat is the contra proferentum rule and how does this apply to exclusion clauses? Which of the following is correct? The contra proferentum rule applies so that an exclusion clause is always interpreted by a court against the party relying on it The contra proferentum rule basically means that an exclusion clause is contrary to the interests of consumers and therefore unenforceable as a term Contra proferentum refers to the ability of consumer law to set a contrary term to that of the parties within a contract The contra proferentum rule means that the party relying on the exclusion clause must be able to prove that the other party agreed to it, otherwise it is not enforceablearrow_forwardJoan, who is a massage therapist graduate, incorporated a massage type business with one of her minor children as the shareholder. Michelle, who is also her best friend, is a regular client of which Joan had rendered massage services each month. Michelle paid Joan’s professional service thru her insurance benefits from her company. Michelle felt that she wants one more massage service and, this time, she used the insurance benefits of her son, Jake, and her son’s name as though the client of Joan. Joan issued a receipt in the name of Jake. Can a minor be shareholder? Can a minor shareholder act as director as well? What is the legal issue with respect of using the insurance benefits of family member. Also, on ethics and professional conduct. The majority shareholders of the ABC Corporation wanted to sell its main assets. The directors called a meeting of shareholders of which the shareholders passed resolution instructing the board of directors to go ahead with the sale, despite…arrow_forward
- 15. Jay Seago is suing the manufacturer of his car for $3.5 million because of a defect that he believes caused him to have an accident. The accident kept him out of work for a year. The company has offered him a settlement of $700,000, of which Jay would receive $600,000 after attorneys' fees. His attorney has advised him that he has a 50% chance of winning his case. If he loses, he will incur attorneys' fees and court costs of $75,000. If he wins, he is not guaranteed his full requested settlement. His attorney believes that there is a 50% chance he could receive the full settlement, in which case Jay would realize $2 million after his attorney takes her cut, and a 50% chance that the jury will award him a lesser amount of $1 million, of which Jay would get $500,000. Using decision tree analysis, decide whether Jay should proceed with his lawsuit against the manufacturer.arrow_forward19) The Elle Corporation manufactures fingernail polish. Suzy buys a container of Elle's fingernail polish, applies it to her nails, and suffers a severe allergic reaction. She sues Elle under the implied warranty of merchantability, The test for determining whether Suzy will recover is whether: A) the nail polish she bought was suitable for the needs of the average consumer. B) the nail polish she bought properly performed its function of coloring one's nails. C) such a reaction in an appreciable number of consumers was reasonably foreseeable. D) the ingredient causing the reaction was foreign to the nail polish or natural to it. nating one model, Bobby noticesarrow_forwardMona's insurer wrote to inform her it was making changes to her health insurance policy( one month before the changes came into force). The changes included new conditions and limits for a skin surgery benefit. Mona made a complaint about the change in the policy, because the new limit would mean Mona wouldn't be able to obtain skin surgery with her regular doctor. Mona said the insurer should not be allowed to reduce her policy benefits and she made a claim to cover her new skin surgery. Required: Determine whether she can claim the hospital expenses under the new insurance policy? And justify your answer with reasonable justifications?arrow_forward
- "Warranties.Harold Moore bought a barrel-racing horse named Clear Boggy for $100,000 for his daugh-ter. The seller was Betty Roper, who appraises barrel-racing horses. (Barrel racing is a rodeo event in which a horse and rider attempt to complete a cloverleaf pattern around preset barrels in the fastest time.) Clear Boggy was promoted for sale as a competitive barrel-racing horse. On inquiry, Roper repre-sented that Clear Boggy did not have any performance issues or medical problems, and that the only medications the horse had been given were hock injections, a common treatment.Shortly after the purchase, Clear Boggy began exhibiting significant performance problems, including nervousness, unwillingness to practice, and stalling during runs. Roper then disclosed that the horse had been given shoulder injec-tions prior to the sale and had previously stalled in competi-tion. Moore took the horse to a veterinarian and discovered that it suffered from arthritis, impinged vertebrae,…arrow_forwardYou are served with Plaintiff's complaint. Plaintiff is suing you! You are furious. Should you ignore Plaintiff's complaint and hope it goes away? Why or why not? What could possibly go wrong? If you do respond to Plaintiff's complaint, should you just deny all of Plaintiff's allegations so Plaintiff will go away, or include something else?arrow_forwardLouisa, who is not a real estate license holder, owns three single-family residences, which she rents out. (She does not occupy any of the residences). Does she have to abide by the Fair Housing Act when selecting tenants? Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act, although she may not use discriminatory advertising. Louisa is exempt from the Fair Housing Act under the Mrs. Murphy exemption. Louisa is not exempt from the Fair Housing Act. Louisa is not exempt under the Fair Housing Act, but she is exemptunder the Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act.arrow_forward
- Brenda Brandt was admitted to Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center (Health Center) to receive treatment for urinary incontinence. During the course of an operation, the doctor surgically implanted a ProteGen Sling (sling) in Brandt. Subsequently, the manufacturer of the sling, Boston Scientific Corporation, issued a recall of the sling because it was causing medical complications in some patients. Brandt suffered serious complications and had the sling surgically removed. Brandt sued Boston Scientific Corporation and Health Center for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability included in Article 2 (Sales) of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Health Center filed a motion with the court to have the case against it dismissed. Health Center argued that it was a provider of services and not a merchant that sold goods, and because the UCC (Sales) applies to the sale of goods, Health Center was not subject to the UCC. Health Center proved that Brandt’s bill was $11,174.50 total charge…arrow_forwardPhillip is a broker who was hired by Sam to help him find a new investment property. Phillip identifies a property that fits Sam's investing criteria. Sam asks Phillip to do some research and provide him with an opinion of title on the property. Is Phillip permitted to do this? ○ No. This would be considered an unauthorized practice of law. No. Phillip needs his sales associates license in order to issue an opinion of title. Yes. Brokers are always permitted to issue an opinion of title. Yes. As long as Phillip notifies FREC, he can issue an opinion of title.arrow_forwardUsing the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background. Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education