Whether the government’s $1 billion expenditure is likely to push U.S real GDP above the level it would have reached in the absence of the government’s construction spree Concept introduction: Direct Expenditure Offsets- The concept is alternatively known as the “ Direct Crowding Out ”. The direct expenditure offsets implies fiscal policy initiatives where the Government increases the public expenditure which culminates into lower investment/expenditure by the private sector. In other words, increased government spending in the market from a macroeconomic perspective, crowds out (pushes out) the private investment from the market. The diminishing private investment offsets the intended value of the government expenditure, partially or completely. If the crowded out private investment is proportional to the government expenditure the latter has no yield. On the other extreme, if the public expenditure does not affect the private spending at all, the government expenditure yields the intent. Indirect Crowding Out- If the government expenditure indirectly pushes out the private investment from the economy it is the indirect crowding out. As the government increases the expenditure without increasing taxes to fund the spending, it creates a budget deficit. The government resorts to borrowing from the private sector to plug the deficit. To borrow from the business sector the government issues bonds. These bonds are made lucrative by yielding a higher interest rate. This pushes up the rate of interest in the economy. Increased interest rate discourages investment. Thus, the crowding out of private investment is an indirect outcome of the expansionary fiscal policy.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 6P

To determine

Whether the government’s $1 billion expenditure is likely to push U.S real GDP above the level it would have reached in the absence of the government’s construction spree

Concept introduction:

Direct Expenditure Offsets- The concept is alternatively known as the “Direct Crowding Out”. The direct expenditure offsets implies fiscal policy initiatives where the Government increases the public expenditure which culminates into lower investment/expenditure by the private sector. In other words, increased government spending in the market from a macroeconomic perspective, crowds out (pushes out) the private investment from the market. The diminishing private investment offsets the intended value of the government expenditure, partially or completely. If the crowded out private investment is proportional to the government expenditure the latter has no yield. On the other extreme, if the public expenditure does not affect the private spending at all, the government expenditure yields the intent.

Indirect Crowding Out- If the government expenditure indirectly pushes out the private investment from the economy it is the indirect crowding out. As the government increases the expenditure without increasing taxes to fund the spending, it creates a budget deficit. The government resorts to borrowing from the private sector to plug the deficit. To borrow from the business sector the government issues bonds. These bonds are made lucrative by yielding a higher interest rate. This pushes up the rate of interest in the economy. Increased interest rate discourages investment. Thus, the crowding out of private investment is an indirect outcome of the expansionary fiscal policy.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

2.) Using the line drawing tool, plot and label the isocost line. Carefully follow the instructions above, and only draw the required objects. FILL IN BLANK d. Now suppose the price of labour rises to $5 per unit, but the firm still wants to produce 500 tires per day. Explain how a cost-minimizing firm adjusts to this change (with no change in technology). A cost-minimizing firm will be producing on ▼ The samedifferently slopedparallel isocost line. The firm will use ▼ moresameless labour and ▼ less the same amount of more capital and produce on ▼ a higher point on the same a lower point on the same a lower a higher isoquant curve.

QK Using the graph on the right, determine how the firm should change the quantity of the production factors in order to reduce the costs. The firm that is producing at point A can reduce its costs for producing 2000 units by employing A. same capital and more labour. B. less capital and more labour. ○ C. less capital and the same labour. D. more capital and more labour. OE. more capital and less labour. C A B Q =4000 Q = 2000 C Isocost line QL

PL Suppose the price ratio is the same along isocost PK lines A and B. In the figure at right, the difference between isocost line A and isocost line B is that A. the total cost is larger along B. B. the total cost is larger along A. OC. labour is relatively more expensive along A. ○ D. the level of output is lower along A. OE. both capital and labour are relatively cheaper along A. Capital B Labour