
The after-tax annual costs and compare and decide whether Machine A should be retained or replaced by Machine B.

Answer to Problem 53P
The machineAshould be retained.
Explanation of Solution
Given for Machine A :
Cost of machine A is
The overhauled cost of Machine A is
Life of Machine A is
Tax expense is
Selling price of Machine is
Salvage value after
Cost of machine B is
Life of Machine B is
Combined tax rate is
Concept used:
Write the formula to calculate the taxable income.
Here, the taxable income is
Write the formula to calculate the taxable amount.
Here, the taxable amount is
Write the formula to calculate the after tax cash flow.
Here, the after tax cash flow is
Calculation:
Calculate the book value of the Machine A.
Calculate Recaptured depreciation if the machine is sold.
Calculate the annual depreciation of machine by using straight line depreciation.
Here, cost of machine is B, salvage value is S, and number of year is, N.
Calculate the annual depreciation of machine A.
Substitute
Calculate the annual depreciation of machine B.
Substitute
Calculate the after-tax cash flow as shown in table below.
Year | BTCF | Depreciation(DI) | Taxable income(TI) | Income tax(TAX) | ATCF |
Here, calculate the taxable income, income tax and after tax cash flow from Equations (I), (II) and (III) respectively.
If machine A were sold the year
Year | BTCF | Depreciation(DI) | Taxable income(TI) | Income tax(TAX) | ATCF |
If machine A is kept, the entries are just the reverse.
Calculate the after-tax annual cost.
Write the equation for factor
Here, annual cost is A, present worth is P, rate of interest is i, and number of year is n.
Calculate the factor
Substitute
Calculate the factor
Substitute
Substitute
The cash flow in year
Calculate the after-tax cash flow for Machine B as shown in table below.
Year | BTCF | Depreciation | Taxable income | Income tax | ATCF |
Calculate the after-tax Annual cost.
Substitute
Conclusion:
The after-tax annual cost of B is more than the A. Hence, keep machine A.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
ENGINEERING ECO ANALYSIS W/STUDY GUIDE
- After the ban is imposed, Joe’s firm switches to the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups. This increases the cost associated with each cup of coffee it produces. Which cost curve(s) will be impacted by the use of the more expensive biodegradable disposable cups? Why? Which cost curve(s) will not shift, and why not? Please use the table below to answer this question. For the second column (“Impacted? If so, how?”), please use one of the following three choices: No shift; Shifts up (i.e., increases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes up); or Shifts down (i.e., decreases: at nearly any given quantity, the cost goes down). $ Cost Curve Impacted? If so, how? Explanation of the Shift: Why or Why Not AFC No shift. Fix costs stay the same, regardless of quantity. Fixed cost is calculated as Fixed Cost/Quantity. Since fixed costs remain unchanged, AFC stays the same for each quantity. MC Shifts up. Since the biodegradable cups are more expensive, the…arrow_forwardStyrofoam is non-biodegradable and is not easily recyclable. Many cities and at least one state have enacted laws that ban the use of polystyrene containers. These locales understand that banning these containers will force many businesses to turn to other more expensive forms of packaging and cups, but argue the ban is environmentally important. Shane owns a firm with a conventional production function resulting in U-shaped ATC, AVC, and MC curves. Shane's business sells takeout food and drinks that are currently packaged in styrofoam containers and cups. Graph the short-run AFC0, AVC0, ATC0, and MC0 curves for Shane's firm before the ban on using styrofoam containers.arrow_forwardd-farrow_forward
- a-c pleasearrow_forwardd-farrow_forwardPART II: Multipart Problems wood or solem of triflussd aidi 1. Assume that a society has a polluting industry comprising two firms, where the industry-level marginal abatement cost curve is given by: MAC = 24 - ()E and the marginal damage function is given by: MDF = 2E. What is the efficient level of emissions? b. What constant per-unit emissions tax could achieve the efficient emissions level? points) c. What is the net benefit to society of moving from the unregulated emissions level to the efficient level? In response to industry complaints about the costs of the tax, a cap-and-trade program is proposed. The marginal abatement cost curves for the two firms are given by: MAC=24-E and MAC2 = 24-2E2. d. How could a cap-and-trade program that achieves the same level of emissions as the tax be designed to reduce the costs of regulation to the two firms?arrow_forward
- Only #4 please, Use a graph please if needed to help provearrow_forwarda-carrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. 2. A stated-preference method will provide a measure of the value of Komodo dragons that is more accurate than the value estimated through application of the travel cost model to visitation data for Komodo National Park in Indonesia. 3. A correlation between community demographics and the present location of polluting facilities is sufficient to claim a violation of distributive justice. olsvrc Q 4. When the damages from pollution are uncertain, a price-based mechanism is best equipped to manage the costs of the regulator's imperfect…arrow_forward
- For environmental economics, question number 2 only please-- thank you!arrow_forwardFor these questions, you must state "true," "false," or "uncertain" and argue your case (roughly 3 to 5 sentences). When appropriate, the use of graphs will make for stronger answers. Credit will depend entirely on the quality of your explanation. 1. If the industry facing regulation for its pollutant emissions has a lot of political capital, direct regulatory intervention will be more viable than an emissions tax to address this market failure. cullog iba linevoz ve bubivorearrow_forwardExercise 3 The production function of a firm is described by the following equation Q=10,000-3L2 where L stands for the units of labour. a) Draw a graph for this equation. Use the quantity produced in the y-axis, and the units of labour in the x-axis. b) What is the maximum production level? c) How many units of labour are needed at that point? d) Provide one reference with you answer.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





