(a)
The magnitude of the relative acceleration as a function of
(a)
Answer to Problem 41AP
The magnitude of the relative acceleration as a function of
Explanation of Solution
A object of mass
Figure I
Formula to calculate the relative acceleration is,
Here,
Formula to calculate the gravitational force exerted by the object on the Earth is,
Here,
By Newton’s law the force exerted by the object is,
From equation (II) and equation (III) is,
The forces
Here,
Substitute
By Newton’s law the force exerted by the Earth is,
From equation (IV) and equation (V) is,
Substitute
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration as a function of
(b)
The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(b)
Answer to Problem 41AP
The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
Explanation of Solution
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(c)
The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(c)
Answer to Problem 41AP
The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
Explanation of Solution
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(d)
The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(d)
Answer to Problem 41AP
The magnitude of the relative acceleration for
Explanation of Solution
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
Substitute
Conclusion:
Therefore, the magnitude of the relative acceleration for
(e)
The pattern of variation of relative acceleration with
(e)
Answer to Problem 41AP
The relative acceleration is directly proportional to the mass
Explanation of Solution
From equation (VI) the relative acceleration is,
This is the linear equation and shows the relative acceleration is directly proportional to the object having mass
Conclusion:
Therefore, the relative acceleration is directly proportional to the object having mass
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, Volume 2
- Two manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.100 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 4.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite.(a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity m/sloss of kinetic energy JExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both.arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.250 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 2.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite.(a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest.m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision?J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocitym/sloss of kinetic energyJExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both. (Do this on paper. Your instructor may ask you to turn in this work.)arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.450 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 3.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest. final velocity (m/s) loss of kinetic energy (J)arrow_forward
- Two manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.100 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 5.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest.m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision?J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocitym/sloss of kinetic energyJarrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.150 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 5.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. (b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? (c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity:loss of kinetic energy:arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.550 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 4.00 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite.(a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity __________ m/sloss of kinetic energy _____________ Jarrow_forward
- Two manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.350 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 3.50 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest. m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision? J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocity m/s loss of kinetic energy JExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in both.arrow_forwardTwo manned satellites approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.300 m/s intend to dock. The first has a mass of 2.50 ✕ 103 kg, and the second a mass of 7.50 ✕ 103 kg. Assume that the positive direction is directed from the second satellite towards the first satellite. (a) Calculate the final velocity after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite was originally at rest.m/s(b) What is the loss of kinetic energy in this inelastic collision?J(c) Repeat both parts, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite was originally at rest.final velocitym/sloss of kinetic energyJExplain why the change in velocity is different in the two frames, whereas the change in kinetic energy is the same in botharrow_forward(COLLAB Gauss's Law for Mass) Journey through the Center of the Earth. A 1024-kg blue ball is dropped from an initial z-position of 3.9 x 10° m through the center of a planet with radius 6.9 x 10° m. If the mass of the planet is 42 x 10'5 kg, measure the displacement of the ball at time t = 8 s?arrow_forward
- Problem 4: Two manned satellites are approaching one another at a relative speed of 0.27 m/s, intending to dock. The first has a mass of 4.25 x 10³ kg, and the second a mass of 9.5 x 10³ kg. Part (a) Calculate the final velocity, in meters per second, of the two satellites after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite is initially at rest. Take the initial velocity of the second satellite to be in the positive direction -0.3730 * Attempts Remain Part (b) What is the change in kinetic energy, in joules, in this inelastic collision? X Attempts Remain / Part (c) Calculate the final velocity of the satellites, in meters per second, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite is initially at rest. Take the initial velocity of the first satellite to be in the negative direction. AKE,=-428.6 AKE,=-428.6 ₂-427.9 ₂-427.9 * Attempts Remain Part (d) What is the change in kinetic energy, in joules, in this frame of reference.arrow_forwardTo manned satellites are approaching one another as a relative speed of 0.24 m/s, intending to dock. The first has a mass of 4.15x10^3 kg, and the second a mass of 10.6x10^3 kg. (A) calculate the final velocity, and meters per second, of the two satellites after docking, in the frame of reference in which the first satellite is initially at rest. Take the initial velocity of the second satellite to be in the positive direction. (B) what is the change of kinetic energy in Jules in this inelastic collision? (c) calculate the final velocity of the satellites, in meters per second, in the frame of reference in which the second satellite is initially at rest. Take the initial velocity of the first satellite to be in the negative direction. (d) what is the change in kinetic energy and joules, in this frame of reference?arrow_forwardA cyclotron is a machine that can be used to accelerate charged particles to achieve large kinetic energies. The resulting beams of highly energetic particles then can be used for many medical applications, including Proton Therapy (a more precise form of "radiation" used in the treatment of some cancers). If a proton (of mass 1.673x10-27kg) is accelerated to its maximum velocity inside a dee with radius 4.46cm (this is the radius you would use for the "r" term in the centripetal acceleration), and if the magnetic field has a magnitude of 3.49x10-2T, what is the resulting velocity of the proton in units of km/s (kilometer per second)?arrow_forward
- Classical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Physics: Principles and Problems, Student...PhysicsISBN:9780078807213Author:Paul W. ZitzewitzPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill