a)
The validity of the statement that the ideology of technical progress leading to solid increases in employment is supported by the changes in employment as well as per capita output in the US after 1900.
a)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
True
Explanation of Solution
Economic information of the US economy since the beginning of the 20th century provides enough evidence as to how technological progress has increased the level of employment. During such time, the per capita output of the nation has increased by a good 7 times. At the same reference period, the employment level has also risen 5 times. As this proves technological progress to be enhancing employment, the statement could be considered as false.
Introduction:Technical progress in any country is said to be enhancing employment levels. Since the beginning of the 20th century, many technical advancements have taken place worldwide, reshaping the economies all over.
b)
The validity of the statement that creative destruction would be equally benefited by workers.
b)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
False
Explanation of Solution
It cannot be said that all workers receive equal benefits via the process of creative destruction. For example, blacksmiths lost their profession due to creative destruction. Although some professions benefitted immensely through this, some had to immensely suffer on the other hand. Hence, the statement could be considered as false.
Introduction:Creative destruction could be defined as the process that demolished the conventional professions or ways and means of doing certain professions. They were replaced with the so called innovative methods. It is subject to debate as to how acceptable this process is.
c)
The validity of the statement that the real wage levels of workers with low skills have declined as compared against that of high skilled workers in the US across the past two decades.
c)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
True
Explanation of Solution
The statement could be considered as true as there had been declines in the real wage levels of low skilled workers in the US. On the contrary, real wages of skilled workers have shown an increase. The said changes in two opposite directions have been instrumental in widening the gap of real wages between high and low skilled workers.
Introduction:Real wage is an important concept that is widely spoken of in economics. It is the actual
d)
The validity of the statement that technological progress creates a decline in employment only if the output increase is below the productivity increase.
d)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
True
Explanation of Solution
The statement could be considered as true as technological progress in deed reduces employment under the condition that the increase in the level of productivity is beyond the increase in the output level. As workers would be paid wages that are in line with their productivity levels, there would be an increase in real wages. If the increase in real wages exceed the increase in the level of output, there would be
Introduction:Technological progress in general is considered to be reducing the level of unemployment. As these concepts are much important in economic analysis, it is worthwhile looking into the relevant conditions under which this would be so.
e)
The validity of the statement that the reduced level of natural unemployment that occurred during the latter half of the 1990’s is possible to be explained by the unexpectedly high productivity
e)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
False
Explanation of Solution
The statement could be considered to be false. As stated above, an unusual increase in the level of
Introduction:It is said that an unusually high growth rate in the aggregate output has been the reason as to why the natural rate of unemployment has declined in the second half of the 20th century in the economy of the US.
f)
The validity of the statement that if technological progress could be stopped, the natural rate of unemployment would decline as a result.
f)
Answer to Problem 1QAP
False
Explanation of Solution
The statement could be considered as false. A technological progress cannot bring down the level of natural unemployment. However, there would be possible changes in natural unemployment that has been caused by features such as higher savings. Nevertheless, technological progress being the driver of growth in the long run, the economy is more likely to be stagnant. This, in turn shall make natural unemployment constant or decrease depending on the population’s growth rate.
Introduction:Natural rate of unemployment refers to the percentage of unemployment resulting from the structural features of an economy. In other words, it is the minimum level of unemployment an economy could have.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Macroeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (7th Edition)
- Consider a hypothetical small island nation in which the only industry is cloud computing. The following table displays information about the economy over a two year period. Complete the table by calculating physical capital per worker as well as labor productivity. Hint: Recall that productivity is defined as the amount of goods and services a worker can produce per hour. In this problem, measure productivity as the quantity of goods per hour of labor. Physical Capital (Servers) Labor Force (Workers) Physical Capital per Worker (Servers) Labor Hours (Hours) Year Output (TB of data storage) Labor Productivity (TB of data storage per hour of labor) 2042 400 100 2043 240 120 4,000 7,800 31,200 32,000 Based on your calculations, productivity from 2042 to 2043. in physical capital per worker from 2042 to 2043 is associated with Suppose you're in charge of establishing economic policy for this small island country. Which of the following policies would lead to greater productivity in the…arrow_forwardGive the point of view of John Stuart Mill on economic development. Explain the pros and cons.arrow_forwardSuppose there is a simple hypothetical economy in which the only industry is cloud computing. In the cloud computing field, productivity—the amount of goods and services a worker can produce per hour—is measured by the number of lines of code one programmer authors per hour.arrow_forward
- For each of the following, identify which inputs into the production function changed(i.e., Physical Capital, Human Capital, or Labor). Also identify whether this phenomenon will increase or decrease economic growth.(a) The government increases federal aid for students to go to college.(b) States embark on a program to increase charging networks for electric cars.(c) A big chunk of the population decides to drop out of the workforce to spend moretime playing video games.arrow_forwardDiscuss the following statement: “Those who argue that technological progress does not reduce employment should take a look at agriculture. At the start of the last century, there were more than 11 million farm workers. Today, there are fewer than 1 million. If all sectors start having the productivity growth that took place in agriculture during the 20th century, no one will be employed a century from now.”arrow_forwardConsider a hypothetical small island nation in which the only industry is weaving. The following table displays information about the economy over a two year period. Complete the table by calculating physical capital per worker as well as labor productivity. Hint: Recall that productivity is defined as the amount of goods and services a worker can produce per hour. In this problem, measure productivity as the quantity of goods per hour of labor. Physical Capital (Looms) 120 Year 2037 2038 400 Labor Force (Workers) 60 100 Based on your calculations, productivity from 2037 to 2038. Physical Capital per Worker (Looms) Labor Hours Imposing a tax on looms (Hours) 3,000 3,500 Suppose you're in charge of establishing economic policy for this small island country. Output (Tapestries) 21,000 49,000 in physical capital per worker from 2037 to 2038 is associated with Which of the following policies would lead to greater productivity in the weaving industry? Check all that apply. Imposing…arrow_forward
- This is an intermediate macroeconomics subject question. Please explain clearly.arrow_forwardDescribe the effect of each of the following on “the potential income” and on “the standard of living” using macroeconomic production function and labor market equilibrium (Note: draw separate graphs for each.) (Hint: Review the slides and recordings of Lectures 3-4 for similar graphical analysis).a) Development of a new technology that increases the productivity of workers.b) An increase in the country’s population.c) Establishment of new manufacturing factories by increased investments.arrow_forwardDescribe the effect of each of the following on “the potential income" and on “the standard of living" using macroeconomic production function and labor market equilibrium (Note: draw separate graphs for each.) (Hint: Review the slides and recordings of Lectures 3-4 for similar graphical analysis). a) Development of a new technology that increases the productivity of workers. b) An increase in the country's population. c) Establishment of new manufacturing factories by increased investments.arrow_forward
- I am having a problem with these four problems webdav/pid-1221589-dt-content-rid-8618514_1/courses/1678.201780/Assign2.pdf + Automatic Zoom : 19. Technological progress helps increase the productivity of labor, defined as the number of units of output produced per hour of labor. A rise in the productivity of labor in the production process, ceteris paribus, will cause A) the demand for the output to increase. B) the demand for the output to decrease. C) the supply of the output to increase. D) the supply of the output to decrease. E) None of the above is correct. Q Search 20. An economic recession with a decline in household incomes will negatively impact all retail businesses. A) True B) False 21. If we assume that the current equilibrium wage for low-skilled labor is $8 per hour and the minimum wage is increased from $5.75 to $7.25 per hour, then A) unemployment among low-skilled workers will increase. B) unemployment among low-skilled workers will remain unaffected. C) unemployment…arrow_forwardThe following table shows levels of real income per person in several economies during the years 1960 and 2010. The table further shows the average annual growth rate for each economy over this time period. For instance, real income per person in Niger was $945 in 1960, and it actually declined to $570 by 2010. Niger's average annual growth rate during this period was -1.01%, and it featured the lowest level of real income per person of any economy listed in the table in the year 2010. The levels of real income per person are reported in U.S. dollars using a base year of 2005. The following exercises will provide insight into the different growth experiences of these nations. Economy Canada United Kingdom Korea Hong Kong Guatemala Niger Indicate which economy satisfies each of the following statements. Statement This economy experienced the fastest rate of growth in real income per person from 1960 to 2010. Real Income per Person in 1960 Real Income per Person in 2010 (Dollars)…arrow_forwardChoose the following option: Q#3) Consider the U.S. economy during two historical periods. The first is from 1870 to 1980 – the era of integrated steel and car production, with coal mines, steel mills and car factories. The second is from 1980 until today – 2020 – the era of computing and biotechnology, with software, artificial intelligence and lab research. A major shift in the sources of labor productivity growth occurred that reflect a greater emphasis on: (a) tangible physical capital (b) intangible knowledge capital Q#4) Consider a poor country with an under-developed economy which could invest trillions into its current capital stock – either moving “up” its current productivity “curve” (PC) or shifting to a new and higher productivity (PC) curve. Which approach is likely best for increasing the country’s living standards (Real GDP Per Person) through time?…arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning