
a)
To discuss: The effect of decision on the Person L’s degree of total leverage.
Introduction:
Leverage refers to the borrowing of amount or debt to utilize for a purchase of equipment, inventory, and other assets of the company.
a)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Person L has changes the financial strategy. The Person L’s annual revenues and its earnings per share (EPS) are as follows:
Year | Revenue | EPS |
Feb,2011 | $48,815 | $1.52 |
Feb,2012 | $50,208 | $1.53 |
Feb,2013 | $50,521 | $1.80 |
The effect of decision on the Person L’s degree of total leverage is as follows:
The firm’s degree of leverage is influenced by financial and operating leverage. As per the Person L’s decisions, the operating leverage is unaffected by the decision in order to use the proceeds from issues of bonds to repurchase shares for the firm. However, this strategy of Person L would increase the firm’s financial leverage. At the time when the financial leverage increases then the firm’s 5total leverage also increases. The firm must reduce other fixed costs to reduce the total leverage.
b)
To determine: The percentage change in ESP and total revenue from 2011 to 2012 and even compute the degree of total leverage.
Introduction:
EPS are the portion of profit that distributed among the shareholders of the company. It can be obtained by dividing earnings available to equity shareholder and the number of outstanding share.
b)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Person L has changes the financial strategy. The Person L’s annual revenues and its earnings per share (EPS) are as follows:
Year | Revenue | EPS |
Feb,2011 | $48,815 | $1.52 |
Feb,2012 | $50,208 | $1.53 |
Feb,2013 | $50,521 | $1.80 |
The formula to compute the percentage change in total revenue is as follows:
The formula to compute the percentage change in EPS is as follows:
The formula to compute the degree of total leverage is as follows:
Compute the percentage change in total revenue:
Hence, the percentage change in total revenue is 2.85%.
Compute the percentage change in EPs:
Hence, the percentage change in EPS is 0.66%.
Compute the degree of total leverage:
Hence, the degree of total leverage is 0.23.
c)
To determine: The percentage change in revenues and EPS from 2012 to 2013 and even compute the degree of total leverage.
c)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Person L has changes the financial strategy. The Person L’s annual revenues and its earnings per share (EPS) are as follows:
Year | Revenue | EPS |
Feb,2011 | $48,815 | $1.52 |
Feb,2012 | $50,208 | $1.53 |
Feb,2013 | $50,521 | $1.80 |
The formula to compute the percentage change in total revenue is as follows:
The formula to compute the percentage change in EPS is as follows:
The formula to compute the degree of total leverage is as follows:
Compute the percentage change in total revenue:
Hence, the percentage change in total revenue is 0.62%.
Compute the percentage change in EPS:
Hence, the percentage change in EPS is 17.65%.
Compute the degree of total leverage:
Hence, the degree of total leverage is 28.46.
d)
To discuss: The interpretation aligns with the expectation of Person L.
d)

Explanation of Solution
The interpretation aligns with the expectation of Person L is as follows:
As per the Person L’s expectations, the total leverage has raise tremendously from 0.23 to 28.46 times during the period. This has taken place after they changed their capital structure of the firm.
e)
To discuss: The beta of Person L’s common stock from the Year 2011 to 2013.
e)

Explanation of Solution
The following would have happened to the beta of Person L’s common stock from the Year 2011 to 2013:
The Person L’s stock beta must have increased during the period. It is because the firm’s profits have been more sensitive towards the trends of the business than it was before the change in capital structure.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Principles of Managerial Finance, Student Value Edition Plus NEW MyLab Finance with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (14th Edition)
- Crenshaw, Incorporated, is considering the purchase of a $367,000 computer with an economic life of five years. The computer will be fully depreciated over five years using the straight-line method. The market value of the computer will be $67,000 in five years. The computer will replace five office employees whose combined annual salaries are $112,000. The machine will also immediately lower the firm's required net working capital by $87,000. This amount of net working capital will need to be replaced once the machine is sold. The corporate tax rate is 22 percent. The appropriate discount rate is 15 percent. Calculate the NPV of this project. Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and round your answer to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. NPV Answer is complete but not entirely correct. S 103,141.80arrow_forwardYour firm is contemplating the purchase of a new $610,000 computer-based order entry system. The system will be depreciated straight-line to zero over its five-year life. It will be worth $66,000 at the end of that time. You will save $240,000 before taxes per year in order processing costs, and you will be able to reduce working capital by $81,000 (this is a one-time reduction). If the tax rate is 21 percent, what is the IRR for this project? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16. IRR %arrow_forwardQUESTION 1 Examine the information provided below and answer the following question. (10 MARKS) The hockey stick model of start-up financing, illustrated by the diagram below, has received a lot of attention in the entrepreneurial finance literature (Cumming & Johan, 2013; Kaplan & Strömberg, 2014; Gompers & Lerner, 2020). The model is often used to describe the typical funding and growth trajectory of many startups. The model emphasizes three main stages, each of which reflects a different phase of growth, risk, and funding expectations. Entrepreneur, 3 F's Debt(banks & microfinance) Research Business angels/Angel Venture funds/Venture capitalists Merger, Acquisition Grants investors PO Public market Growth (revenue) Break even point Pide 1st round Expansion 2nd round 3rd round Research commercial idea Pre-seed Initial concept Seed Early Expansion Financial stage Late IPO Inception and prototype Figure 1. The hockey stick model of start-up financing (Lasrado & Lugmayr, 2013) REQUIRED:…arrow_forward
- critically discuss the hockey stick model of a start-up financing. In your response, explain the model and discibe its three main stages, highlighting the key characteristics of each stage in terms of growth, risk, and funding expectations.arrow_forwardSolve this problem please .arrow_forwardSolve this finance question.arrow_forward
- Essentials Of InvestmentsFinanceISBN:9781260013924Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.Publisher:Mcgraw-hill Education,
- Foundations Of FinanceFinanceISBN:9780134897264Author:KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. WilliamPublisher:Pearson,Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou...FinanceISBN:9781337395250Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. HoustonPublisher:Cengage LearningCorporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i...FinanceISBN:9780077861759Author:Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





