Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337093897
Author: Frank B. Cross, Roger LeRoy Miller
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 1BS
Summary Introduction
Case summary: Elderly person J resides with his nephew S. S supports J and is also dependent on S. J was told by S that unless J changes the ownership of the tract of land to S for a rate 35 percent below the market value of the land, S will not take any responsibility of J and will not look after him. J gave up to the threat of S and made a contract with him.
To discuss: Any possibility for the person J to disengage himself from fulfilling the terms of the contract.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Undue Influence. Juan is an elderly man who liveswith his nephew, Samuel. Juan is totally dependent on Samuel’s support. Samuel tells Juan that unless he transfers a tractof land he owns to Samuel for a price 35 percent below itsmarket value, Samuel will no longer support and take care ofhim. Juan enters into the contract. Discuss fully whether Juancan set aside this contract. (See Voluntary Consent.)
13-2. Undue Influence. Juan is an elderly man who lives
with his nephew, Samuel. Juan is totally dependent on
Samuel's support. Samuel tells Juan that unless he transfers
a tract of land he owns to Samuel for a price 35 percent
below its market value, Samuel will no longer support and
take care of him. Juan enters into the contract. Discuss fully
whether Juan can set aside this contract. (See Voluntary
Dimitri lends his brother, Calvin, $1,800. Calvin and Willa agree that Calvin will build a new pool
deck for Willa in exchange for Willa paying Dimitri $1,800. Calvin builds the pool deck, but Willa
refuses to pay Dimitri any money. Can Dimitri sue for payment?
O No, because Dimitri was not a party to the contract.
O No. because Dimitri did not build the pool deck.
O Yes, because Dimitri is a donee beneficiary.
O No, because Dimitri is an incidental beneficiary.
Yes, because Dimitri is a creditor beneficiary.
Chapter 13 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Bakar is a renowned pastry Mama Cafe, a sole proprietorship, is a well-known restaurant in need of hiring a pastry chef. Bakar and Cafe’s Owner had extensive conversations regarding Bakar coming to work at Cafe. On May 1, a week after those conversations occurred, Bakar sent Cafe a signed letter dated May 1 stating, “I will work for Cafe as a head pastry chef for two years for an annual salary of RM50,000.” On the morning of May 7, Cafe’s Owner telephoned Bakar and said, “The RM50,000 is pretty stiff. Could you possibly consider working for less”? Bakar replied: “I am a renowned pastry chef. I will not work for any less.” Later that morning, Cafe’s Owner sent Bakar a signed letter by regular mail stating: “You obviously think you are too good for my restaurant. I am no longer interested in hiring you to work at Cafe.” Later that afternoon, Cafe’s Owner had a change of heart and sent Bakar a registered, express-mail signed letter stating: “Okay, if you really won’t work for less, I…arrow_forwardBakar is a renowned pastry Mama Cafe, a sole proprietorship, is a well-known restaurant in need of hiring a pastry chef. Bakar and Cafe’s Owner had extensive conversations regarding Bakar coming to work at Cafe. On May 1, a week after those conversations occurred, Bakar sent Cafe a signed letter dated May 1 stating, “I will work for Cafe as a head pastry chef for two years for an annual salary of RM50,000.” On the morning of May 7, Cafe’s Owner telephoned Bakar and said, “The RM50,000 is pretty stiff. Could you possibly consider working for less”? Bakar replied: “I am a renowned pastry chef. I will not work for any less.” Later that morning, Cafe’s Owner sent Bakar a signed letter by regular mail stating: “You obviously think you are too good for my restaurant. I am no longer interested in hiring you to work at Cafe.” Later that afternoon, Cafe’s Owner had a change of heart and sent Bakar a registered, express-mail signed letter stating: “Okay, if you really won’t work for less, I…arrow_forwardBakar is a renowned pastry Mama Cafe, a sole proprietorship, is a well-known restaurant in need of hiring a pastry chef. Bakar and Cafe’s Owner had extensive conversations regarding Bakar coming to work at Cafe. On May 1, a week after those conversations occurred, Bakar sent Cafe a signed letter dated May 1 stating, “I will work for Cafe as a head pastry chef for two years for an annual salary of RM50,000.” On the morning of May 7, Cafe’s Owner telephoned Bakar and said, “The RM50,000 is pretty stiff. Could you possibly consider working for less”? Bakar replied: “I am a renowned pastry chef. I will not work for any less.” Later that morning, Cafe’s Owner sent Bakar a signed letter by regular mail stating: “You obviously think you are too good for my restaurant. I am no longer interested in hiring you to work at Cafe.” Later that afternoon, Cafe’s Owner had a change of heart and sent Bakar a registered, express-mail signed letter stating: “Okay, if you really won’t work for less, I…arrow_forward
- The statute of frauds does NOT cover which of the following contracts? Bridgeby enters into a contract for the sale of her house. Ruelle and Randolph enter into a pre-nuptial agreement. O Quincy accepts Cleo's offer to buy from Cleo her couch for the price of $4,000. Jasper, the executor of the estate of Gabrielle's dead cousin, agrees with Gabrielle that Gabrielle will pay a debt of that estate: Gabrielle will inherit three-fourths of the estate, with the rest going to various charities. O For the price of $599. Millie enters into a contract with a merchant, Reesa, to buy from Reesa some wrenches with an estimated barter value of approximately $620.arrow_forwardsanjayarrow_forward. Spouses Robert and Yollie wanted to sell their house. They found a prospective buyer, Nina, Yollie negotiated with Nina for the sale of the property, They agreed on a fair price of million. Nina sent Yollie a letter confirming her intention to buy the property. Later,another couple, Marius and Ellen, offered a similar house at a lower price of 1.million. But Nina insisted on buying the house of Robert and Yollie for sentimental reasons. Nina prepared a deed of sale to be signed by the couple and a managers check for million. After receiving the million. Robert signed the deed of sale. However, Yollie was not able to sign it because she was saying she changed her mind. Yollie filled suit for nullification of the deed of sale and for moral and exemplary damages against Nina Does Nina have any cause of action against Robert and Yollie?arrow_forward
- Which of the following represents an agency relationship? 1) Horace wants to sell his farm and hires Marcie as his realtor. The two agree that if Marcie finds a buyer for the farm at Horace's price, then Horace will pay Marcie 7% of the price he receives. 2) Bob dies and leaves his assets in a trust for his minor child, Lilly. In the trust, Bob appoints Reggie as the trustee to act for Lilly's benefit. Since Reggie has a fiduciary duty to Lilly as trustee, Reggie is Lilly's agent. 3) Lucy contracts to sell her car to Tony for $5,000. Tony purchases the car only to find it not in the condition that Lucy described it. Tony is claiming that Lucy violated her fiduciary duty to him as his agent under the agreement. 4) Hunt is an attorney of questionable ethics. Roger, one of Hunt's clients, is arrested for DUI, but appears to be too intoxicated to consent to a breath test. Hunt is contacted by…arrow_forwardVinson had a severe gambling problem. Every night, he stayed awake to the early hours of the morning picking games and spreads and betting online or calling his bookie. Finally, Vinson's wife, Bethany, had enough of Vinson's gambling. Bethany entered into a written contract with Hyacinth, a gambling addiction therapist who agreed to treat Vinson twice a week for six months. The contract is signed in writing (by the contract parties. Bethany and Hyacinth; and, of course, also by the patient, Vinson). Vinson then begins his counseling. However, after two months. Bethany sees no improvement in Vinson's behavior. After all, her debit cards just got declined at the store, and when she confronted Vinson, he simply stated, "I lost $1,000 on the Miami Marlins last night." Bethany decides she is going to breach the contract, that is, to stop paying Hyacinth. What would a court most likely find, if Hyacinth sues Bethany to enforce the contract and make Bethany pay for the breach? O UCC Article 2…arrow_forwardGary contracts with Dan to buy Dan a new car manufactured by General Motors Corporation (GMC). GMC is a. an intended beneficiary b. an incidental beneficiary c. not a third party beneficiary d. both a and barrow_forward
- Alex and Ann enter a contract for Ann to cook a gourmet meal for Alex and Alex to pay Ann $50. Alex shows up at Ann's house with $50 and hands it to Ann. Ann refuses to accept the money. What has Alex done? Discharged his duties under the contract. Not yet performed his duties under the contract Substantially performed his duties. Breached the contractarrow_forwardMai enters into an agreement to sell an antique bedroom set to Alice for $200,000 because it is exquisite and unique. Madison offers to pay Mai $250,000 for the furniture. Mai calls Alice to cancel the contract. Is this a type of contract where usually contains a liquidated damages clause? Why or why not?arrow_forward5 Matthew and Joe were roommates. When they were renting their apartment, each agreed to pay half of the cost of the rent and the cable and electric bills. Two months after moving in, Matthew borrowed Joe's car and was involved in an accident. Matthew promised to pay $2,200 in damages if Joe promised not to file a claim with his insurance company. Joe agreed. However, Matthew never paid him for the damages. He claimed that the agreement was not enforceable because there was no consideration. What is the outcome?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education