The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

The following errors took place in journalizing and posting transactions:a. The payment of $3,125 from a customer on account was recorded as a debit to Cash and a credit toAccounts Payable.b. Advertising expense of $1,500 paid for the current month was recorded as a debit to MiscellaneousExpense and a credit to Advertising Expense.c. The purchase of supplies of $2,690 on the account was recorded as a debit to Office Equipment anda credit to Supplies.d. The receipt of $3,750 for services rendered was recorded as a debit to Accounts Receivable and acredit to Fees Earned.Required:Prepare journal entries to correct the errors.Each error correction carries equal marks.

Required:a) Journalize the following transactions using the direct write-off method of accounting foruncollectible receivables:Aug. 7. Received $175 from Roosevelt McLair and wrote off the remainder owed of $400 asuncollectible.Nov. 23. Reinstated the account of Roosevelt McLair and received $400 cash in full payment.b) Journalize the following transactions using the allowance method of accounting for uncollectiblereceivables:Feb. 12. Received $750 from Manning Wingard and wrote off the remainder owed of $2,000 asuncollectible.June 30. Reinstated the account of Manning Wingard and received $2,000 cash in full payment.Each journal carries equal marks

If someone tracks, tallys and totals a current liabilities for an accounting period, and then seeks to apply this value in a calculation to assess our liquidity, what’s the difference between the current ratio and the “acid-test” (or “quick”) ratio? Does the difference between these two metrics even matter?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 5

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Answer 6

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Answer 7

Chapter 13, Problem 1BCC

Scene1.

To determine

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Answer 8

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

Answer 9

Scene2.

To determine

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

Answer 10

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Answer 11

To determine

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

Answer 12

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

Answer 13

Scene3.

To determine

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

Answer 14

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

Answer 15

To determine

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

Answer 16

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Answer 17

To determine

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

Answer 18

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Answer 19

Scene 4.

To determine

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

Answer 20

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Answer 21

Scene 5.

To determine

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Answer 22

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

Answer 23

Scene 6.

To determine

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

Answer 24

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

Answer 25

To determine

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

Answer 26

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Answer 27

To determine

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Answer 28

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 29

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 30

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Answer 31

Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.1Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.2Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.3Q Ch. 13 - Do sellers recognize sales taxes as expenses on...Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.5Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.6Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.7Q Ch. 13 - What is a gam contingency? Is It accrued and...Ch. 13 - Do firms always accrue and record loss...Ch. 13 - Prob. 13.10Q

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

Solution Summary: The author explains the difference between a provision under IFRS and one under US GAAP.

The reasons which makes the provision different from the other types of current liabilities reported on a company’s balance sheet.

The way in which a provision under IFRS and a contingency under U.S GAAP differ.

The reason that makes provisions to be separately identified rather than being included with other accrued liability.

The probabilities assigned to each category under U.S GAAP and IFRS.

The reason why the probabilities are not used in the standards rather than the expressions that are subject to interpretation.

Whether the guidance provided for loss contingencies under U.S GAAP to be rules based or not and is IFRS more principle based than the U.S GAAP guidance.

The comparison between the view regarding loss contingency and if one view is more liberal than the other.

The standard under which there is more disclosure in the financial statements.

Whether the concept of ‘conservatism’ be considered while determining a contingency.

Whether the standards at odds with the concept of conservatism because they do not require contingent liabilities to be recognized unless they are probable and can be estimated or not.

Whether the concept of conservatism is a guiding principle for developing accounting standards or not.

Want to see the full answer?

Chapter 13 Solutions