
a.
Test whether fatal bicycle accidents are equally likely to occur in each of the 12-months at 0.01 significance level.
a.

Answer to Problem 10E
There is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents are not equally likely to occur in each of the months.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The given data represent the classification of fatal bicycle accidents according to the month in which the accident occurred.
The expected counts are calculated as shown below:
Month | Observed counts | Expected counts |
January | 38 | |
February | 32 | |
March | 43 | |
April | 59 | |
May | 78 | |
June | 74 | |
July | 98 | |
August | 85 | |
September | 64 | |
October | 66 | |
November | 42 | |
December | 40 | |
719 | 719 |
The nine-step hypotheses testing procedure to test goodness-of-fit is given below:
1. Consider that the proportion of fatal bicycle accidents occurring in January is
2. Null hypothesis:
3. Alternative hypothesis:
4. Significance level:
5. Test statistic:
6. Assumptions:
- Assume that the 719 accidents included in the study is a random sample from the population of fatal bicycle accidents.
- From the table, it is observed that all the expected counts are greater than 5.
7. Calculation:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the test statistics and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Tables > Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test (One Variable).
- In Observed counts, enter the column of Number of Accidents.
- In Category names, enter the column of Month.
- Under Test, select the Equal Proportions.
- Click OK.
The output obtained using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output,
8. P-value:
From the MINITAB output,
9. Conclusion:
Decision rule:
- If P-value is less than or equal to the level of significance, reject the null hypothesis.
- Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Here the level of significance is 0.01.
Here, P-value is less than the level of significance.
That is,
Hence, reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, there is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents are not equally likely to occur in each of the months.
b.
Write the null and alternative hypotheses to determine if some months are riskier than others by taking differing month lengths into account.
b.

Explanation of Solution
The null hypothesis in Part (a) specifies that fatal accidents are equally likely to occur in any of the 12 months.
The year considered in the study is 2004, which is a leap year. It is known that a leap year contains 366 days, with 29 days in February.
The null and alternative hypotheses to determine if some months are riskier than others by taking differing month lengths and the characteristics of a leap year into account are as follows:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
c.
Test the hypotheses proposed in Part (b) at 0.05 significance level.
c.

Answer to Problem 10E
There is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents do not occur in any of the twelve months in proportion to the lengths of the months.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The expected counts are calculated as shown below:
Month | Observed counts |
Proportion | Expected counts |
January | 38 | 0.085 | |
February | 32 | 0.079 | |
March | 43 | 0.085 | |
April | 59 | 0.082 | |
May | 78 | 0.085 | |
June | 74 | 0.082 | |
July | 98 | 0.085 | |
August | 85 | 0.085 | |
September | 64 | 0.082 | |
October | 66 | 0.085 | |
November | 42 | 0.082 | |
December | 40 | 0.085 | |
719 | 1 (approximately) | 719 |
Significance level:
Test statistic:
Assumptions:
- Assume that the 719 accidents included in the study is a random sample from the population of fatal bicycle accidents.
- From the table, it is observed that all the expected counts are greater than 5.
Calculation:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the test statistic and P-value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Stat > Tables > Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test (One Variable).
- In Observed counts, enter the column of Number of Accidents.
- In Category names, enter the column of Month.
- Under Test, select the column of Proportion in Proportions specified by historical counts.
- Click OK.
The output obtained using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the output,
8. P-value:
From the MINITAB output,
9. Conclusion:
Decision rule:
- If P-value is less than or equal to the level of significance, reject the null hypothesis.
- Otherwise, do not reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Here the level of significance is 0.05.
Here, P-value is less than the level of significance.
That is,
Hence, reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, there is convincing evidence that fatal bicycle accidents do not occur in any of the twelve months in proportion to the lengths of the months.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Bundle: Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis, 5th + WebAssign Printed Access Card: Peck/Olsen/Devore. 5th Edition, Single-Term
- This problem is based on the fundamental option pricing formula for the continuous-time model developed in class, namely the value at time 0 of an option with maturity T and payoff F is given by: We consider the two options below: Fo= -rT = e Eq[F]. 1 A. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K = So. B. An option with which you must buy a share of stock at expiration T = 1 for strike price K given by T K = T St dt. (Note that both options can have negative payoffs.) We use the continuous-time Black- Scholes model to price these options. Assume that the interest rate on the money market is r. (a) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option A. (Hint: use the martingale properties developed in the lectures for the stock price process in order to calculate the expectations.) (b) Using the fundamental option pricing formula, find the price of option B. (c) Assuming the interest rate is very small (r ~0), use Taylor…arrow_forwardDiscuss and explain in the picturearrow_forwardBob and Teresa each collect their own samples to test the same hypothesis. Bob’s p-value turns out to be 0.05, and Teresa’s turns out to be 0.01. Why don’t Bob and Teresa get the same p-values? Who has stronger evidence against the null hypothesis: Bob or Teresa?arrow_forward
- Review a classmate's Main Post. 1. State if you agree or disagree with the choices made for additional analysis that can be done beyond the frequency table. 2. Choose a measure of central tendency (mean, median, mode) that you would like to compute with the data beyond the frequency table. Complete either a or b below. a. Explain how that analysis can help you understand the data better. b. If you are currently unable to do that analysis, what do you think you could do to make it possible? If you do not think you can do anything, explain why it is not possible.arrow_forward0|0|0|0 - Consider the time series X₁ and Y₁ = (I – B)² (I – B³)Xt. What transformations were performed on Xt to obtain Yt? seasonal difference of order 2 simple difference of order 5 seasonal difference of order 1 seasonal difference of order 5 simple difference of order 2arrow_forwardCalculate the 90% confidence interval for the population mean difference using the data in the attached image. I need to see where I went wrong.arrow_forward
- Microsoft Excel snapshot for random sampling: Also note the formula used for the last column 02 x✓ fx =INDEX(5852:58551, RANK(C2, $C$2:$C$51)) A B 1 No. States 2 1 ALABAMA Rand No. 0.925957526 3 2 ALASKA 0.372999976 4 3 ARIZONA 0.941323044 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.071266381 Random Sample CALIFORNIA NORTH CAROLINA ARKANSAS WASHINGTON G7 Microsoft Excel snapshot for systematic sampling: xfx INDEX(SD52:50551, F7) A B E F G 1 No. States Rand No. Random Sample population 50 2 1 ALABAMA 0.5296685 NEW HAMPSHIRE sample 10 3 2 ALASKA 0.4493186 OKLAHOMA k 5 4 3 ARIZONA 0.707914 KANSAS 5 4 ARKANSAS 0.4831379 NORTH DAKOTA 6 5 CALIFORNIA 0.7277162 INDIANA Random Sample Sample Name 7 6 COLORADO 0.5865002 MISSISSIPPI 8 7:ONNECTICU 0.7640596 ILLINOIS 9 8 DELAWARE 0.5783029 MISSOURI 525 10 15 INDIANA MARYLAND COLORADOarrow_forwardSuppose the Internal Revenue Service reported that the mean tax refund for the year 2022 was $3401. Assume the standard deviation is $82.5 and that the amounts refunded follow a normal probability distribution. Solve the following three parts? (For the answer to question 14, 15, and 16, start with making a bell curve. Identify on the bell curve where is mean, X, and area(s) to be determined. 1.What percent of the refunds are more than $3,500? 2. What percent of the refunds are more than $3500 but less than $3579? 3. What percent of the refunds are more than $3325 but less than $3579?arrow_forwardA normal distribution has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 4. Solve the following three parts? 1. Compute the probability of a value between 44.0 and 55.0. (The question requires finding probability value between 44 and 55. Solve it in 3 steps. In the first step, use the above formula and x = 44, calculate probability value. In the second step repeat the first step with the only difference that x=55. In the third step, subtract the answer of the first part from the answer of the second part.) 2. Compute the probability of a value greater than 55.0. Use the same formula, x=55 and subtract the answer from 1. 3. Compute the probability of a value between 52.0 and 55.0. (The question requires finding probability value between 52 and 55. Solve it in 3 steps. In the first step, use the above formula and x = 52, calculate probability value. In the second step repeat the first step with the only difference that x=55. In the third step, subtract the answer of the first part from the…arrow_forward
- If a uniform distribution is defined over the interval from 6 to 10, then answer the followings: What is the mean of this uniform distribution? Show that the probability of any value between 6 and 10 is equal to 1.0 Find the probability of a value more than 7. Find the probability of a value between 7 and 9. The closing price of Schnur Sporting Goods Inc. common stock is uniformly distributed between $20 and $30 per share. What is the probability that the stock price will be: More than $27? Less than or equal to $24? The April rainfall in Flagstaff, Arizona, follows a uniform distribution between 0.5 and 3.00 inches. What is the mean amount of rainfall for the month? What is the probability of less than an inch of rain for the month? What is the probability of exactly 1.00 inch of rain? What is the probability of more than 1.50 inches of rain for the month? The best way to solve this problem is begin by a step by step creating a chart. Clearly mark the range, identifying the…arrow_forwardClient 1 Weight before diet (pounds) Weight after diet (pounds) 128 120 2 131 123 3 140 141 4 178 170 5 121 118 6 136 136 7 118 121 8 136 127arrow_forwardClient 1 Weight before diet (pounds) Weight after diet (pounds) 128 120 2 131 123 3 140 141 4 178 170 5 121 118 6 136 136 7 118 121 8 136 127 a) Determine the mean change in patient weight from before to after the diet (after – before). What is the 95% confidence interval of this mean difference?arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL

