The decomposition of NH 3 to N 2 and H 2 was studied on two surfaces: Surface E a (kJ/mol) W 163 Os 197 Without a catalyst, the activation energy is 335 kJ/mol. a. Which surface is the better heterogeneous catalyst for the decomposition of NH 3 ? Why? b. How many times faster is the reaction at 298 K on the W surface compared with the reaction with no catalyst present? Assume that the frequency factor A is the same for each reaction. c. The decomposition reaction on the two surfaces obeys a rate law of the form Rate = k [ NH 3 ] [ H 2 ] How can you explain the inverse dependence of the rate on the H 2 concentration?
The decomposition of NH 3 to N 2 and H 2 was studied on two surfaces: Surface E a (kJ/mol) W 163 Os 197 Without a catalyst, the activation energy is 335 kJ/mol. a. Which surface is the better heterogeneous catalyst for the decomposition of NH 3 ? Why? b. How many times faster is the reaction at 298 K on the W surface compared with the reaction with no catalyst present? Assume that the frequency factor A is the same for each reaction. c. The decomposition reaction on the two surfaces obeys a rate law of the form Rate = k [ NH 3 ] [ H 2 ] How can you explain the inverse dependence of the rate on the H 2 concentration?
Solution Summary: The author explains that the substance that speeds up the rate of reaction without getting consumed itself in a chemical reaction is known as catalyst.
The decomposition of NH3 to N2 and H2 was studied on two surfaces:
Surface
Ea (kJ/mol)
W
163
Os
197
Without a catalyst, the activation energy is 335 kJ/mol.
a. Which surface is the better heterogeneous catalyst for the decomposition of NH3? Why?
b. How many times faster is the reaction at 298 K on the W surface compared with the reaction with no catalyst present? Assume that the frequency factor A is the same for each reaction.
c. The decomposition reaction on the two surfaces obeys a rate law of the form
Rate
=
k
[
NH
3
]
[
H
2
]
How can you explain the inverse dependence of the rate on the H2 concentration?
Comparison of experimental data to “known” value. Monna and co-workers used radioactive isotopes to date sediments from lakes and estuaries.21 To verify this method they analyzed a 208Po standard known to have an activity of 77.5 decays/min, obtaining the following results.
77.09, 75.37, 72.42, 76.84, 77.84, 76.69, 78.03, 74.96, 77.54, 76.09, 81.12, 75.75
Do the results differ from the expected results at the 95% confidence interval?
Explain the difference between the propagated uncertainty and the standard deviation. Which number would you use to describe the uncertainty in the measurement? if the standard deviation is 0.01 and the propagated uncertainty is 0.03
Propagation of uncertainty. Find the absolute and percent relative uncertainty assuming the ±-values are random error.
7.65±0.04 + 5.28±0.02 – 1.12±0.01
85.6±0.9 × 50.2±0.7 ÷ 13.8±0.5
[4.88±0.07 + 3.22±0.05] / 1.53±0.02
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; Darrell
Author:Steven D. Gammon, Ebbing, Darrell Ebbing, Steven D., Darrell; Gammon, Darrell Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon, Darrell D.; Gammon, Ebbing; Steven D. Gammon; Darrell