(a)
To determine:
To set the spreadsheet for calculating the relative strength of the banking sector compared to the broad market.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Answer to Problem 24PS
The spreadsheet is obtained and given in explanation.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data given in the website. The initial value of the sector index and S&P 500 Index is equal to 100. Each week's
The data was downloaded from the given website.
Week | SPY rate | FSRBX rate |
2013.01 | 1.64 | 1.75 |
2013.02 | 0.17 | 0.55 |
2013.03 | -0.82 | -0.92 |
2013.04 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
2013.05 | 0.59 | 0.92 |
2013.06 | -0.21 | -0.08 |
2013.07 | 0.12 | 1.37 |
2013.08 | 1.19 | 1.80 |
2013.09 | -3.27 | -2.73 |
2013.10 | -1.00 | -0.58 |
2013.11 | -0.03 | -0.87 |
2013.12 | 3.25 | 1.09 |
2013.13 | -0.23 | -0.21 |
2013.14 | -0.47 | -3.37 |
2013.15 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
2013.16 | -2.97 | -1.55 |
2013.17 | -0.91 | -1.75 |
2013.18 | 0.07 | 0.40 |
2013.19 | -0.20 | 1.11 |
2013.20 | 2.77 | 2.50 |
2013.21 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
2013.22 | 1.21 | 0.38 |
2013.23 | -0.27 | -0.89 |
2013.24 | 0.19 | 0.52 |
2013.25 | -0.85 | -0.17 |
2013.26 | -1.02 | -1.16 |
2013.27 | -0.92 | 0.04 |
2013.28 | -1.57 | 0.04 |
2013.29 | 1.72 | 0.95 |
2013.30 | -3.60 | -1.97 |
2013.31 | 0.32 | 0.83 |
2013.32 | 3.07 | 3.47 |
2013.33 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
2013.34 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
2013.35 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
2013.36 | 0.50 | 0.21 |
2013.37 | -1.49 | -1.72 |
2013.38 | 1.96 | 2.08 |
2013.39 | -1.00 | 0.16 |
2013.40 | -1.11 | -0.37 |
2013.41 | -1.13 | -1.51 |
2013.42 | 2.91 | 3.28 |
2013.43 | 3.61 | 2.73 |
2013.44 | 1.29 | 1.60 |
2013.45 | -0.86 | -2.16 |
2013.46 | 0.79 | 1.18 |
2013.47 | 0.76 | 0.19 |
2013.48 | 0.06 | -0.19 |
2013.49 | 0.57 | 0.04 |
2013.50 | 1.11 | 1.83 |
2013.51 | 0.08 | -0.15 |
2013.52 | -2.01 | -2.22 |
2014.01 | -0.17 | -1.56 |
2014.02 | -1.24 | 0.16 |
2014.03 | 0.56 | -0.28 |
2014.04 | 2.38 | 2.74 |
2014.05 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
2014.06 | -0.32 | -2.45 |
2014.07 | 0.87 | 0.36 |
2014.08 | 1.07 | 1.63 |
2014.09 | -1.91 | -1.87 |
2014.10 | -1.15 | -1.23 |
2014.11 | -1.18 | -2.58 |
2014.12 | 0.25 | 0.29 |
2014.13 | 0.48 | 0.66 |
2014.14 | -3.26 | -2.29 |
2014.15 | 1.24 | 0.75 |
2014.16 | 0.16 | 1.54 |
2014.17 | 1.15 | 0.78 |
2014.18 | -1.17 | -1.30 |
2014.19 | 2.93 | 3.13 |
2014.20 | 0.96 | -0.52 |
2014.21 | -0.09 | -0.36 |
2014.22 | 0.05 | -0.04 |
2014.23 | 1.37 | 1.65 |
2014.24 | -1.96 | -1.07 |
2014.25 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
2014.26 | 1.49 | 1.19 |
2014.27 | 1.26 | 1.65 |
2014.28 | 0.57 | 0.35 |
2014.29 | 0.16 | -0.92 |
2014.30 | -0.69 | -1.24 |
2014.31 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
2014.32 | -0.47 | 0.39 |
2014.33 | -1.39 | -1.92 |
2014.34 | 1.24 | 1.00 |
2014.35 | 1.91 | 0.63 |
2014.36 | -0.46 | 0.08 |
2014.37 | -1.67 | -2.36 |
2014.38 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
2014.39 | -2.79 | -1.73 |
2014.40 | -0.78 | 0.04 |
2014.41 | -0.45 | 1.02 |
2014.42 | 1.41 | 2.23 |
2014.43 | 1.93 | 1.03 |
2014.44 | 1.35 | 3.02 |
2014.45 | 1.10 | -0.19 |
2014.46 | 1.60 | 1.72 |
2014.47 | -0.22 | -0.68 |
2014.48 | -0.41 | -0.38 |
2014.49 | 0.55 | 0.72 |
2014.50 | 0.31 | 0.19 |
2014.51 | -1.77 | -1.73 |
2014.52 | 3.15 | 2.41 |
2015.01 | 0.19 | -0.52 |
2015.02 | -2.10 | -2.89 |
2015.03 | 2.04 | 2.59 |
2015.04 | -1.76 | -1.81 |
2015.05 | 0.29 | 0.81 |
2015.06 | 1.72 | 1.71 |
2015.07 | 0.47 | 1.35 |
2015.08 | -0.50 | -1.07 |
2015.09 | -0.13 | 0.07 |
2015.1 | 1.99 | 2.13 |
2015.11 | -0.32 | -0.51 |
2015.12 | -0.29 | -0.66 |
2015.13 | -0.23 | -0.04 |
2015.14 | -0.64 | -0.41 |
2015.15 | 1.90 | 1.37 |
2015.16 | 0.24 | 3.11 |
2015.17 | 0.80 | 0.57 |
2015.18 | -2.48 | -2.76 |
2015.19 | -1.66 | -1.49 |
2015.2 | 1.01 | 0.59 |
2015.21 | 0.48 | 1.06 |
2015.22 | -2.83 | -0.80 |
2015.23 | -0.12 | -1.72 |
2015.24 | -0.17 | -1.60 |
2015.25 | 2.29 | 2.08 |
2015.26 | -0.53 | -0.11 |
2015.27 | -2.44 | -1.30 |
2015.28 | 0.34 | 2.67 |
2015.29 | 3.25 | 2.31 |
2015.3 | 0.17 | 0.72 |
2015.31 | -0.93 | -1.99 |
2015.32 | 2.89 | 1.88 |
2015.33 | -0.67 | -1.14 |
2015.34 | 1.23 | 0.54 |
2015.35 | -0.86 | -0.54 |
2015.36 | 1.73 | 1.80 |
2015.37 | -0.38 | -0.25 |
2015.38 | 1.61 | 0.78 |
2015.39 | 1.08 | 0.67 |
2015.4 | 1.20 | 0.87 |
2015.41 | 0.15 | -1.21 |
2015.42 | 0.78 | 0.28 |
2015.43 | -1.00 | -1.01 |
2015.44 | 1.25 | 1.62 |
2015.45 | 1.58 | 0.28 |
2015.46 | -0.05 | -0.62 |
2015.47 | -0.09 | -0.49 |
2015.48 | 0.85 | 1.12 |
2015.49 | 0.65 | 2.04 |
2015.5 | -1.11 | 0.03 |
2015.51 | 0.62 | 0.34 |
2015.52 | -0.76 | -0.74 |
2016.01 | 1.92 | 0.34 |
2016.02 | -0.29 | -0.65 |
2016.03 | -0.48 | -0.27 |
2016.04 | 1.88 | 1.78 |
2016.05 | -0.60 | -0.20 |
2016.06 | 1.24 | 1.82 |
2016.07 | -0.29 | -0.50 |
2016.08 | -4.57 | -4.10 |
2016.09 | 1.52 | 0.35 |
2016.1 | -1.21 | -1.77 |
2016.11 | 3.51 | 3.45 |
2016.12 | -0.97 | -2.21 |
2016.13 | 1.58 | -0.31 |
2016.14 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
2016.15 | 2.27 | 3.50 |
2016.16 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
2016.17 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
2016.18 | -0.03 | 0.34 |
2016.19 | 1.16 | 0.60 |
2016.2 | -0.61 | -0.97 |
2016.21 | 1.57 | 0.84 |
2016.22 | -1.97 | -2.20 |
2016.23 | 1.78 | 1.47 |
2016.24 | -1.64 | -2.55 |
2016.25 | -0.08 | -0.41 |
2016.26 | 1.70 | 1.18 |
2016.27 | 1.22 | 0.24 |
2016.28 | -0.87 | -3.31 |
2016.29 | -5.46 | -5.40 |
2016.3 | -0.90 | -4.03 |
2016.31 | 0.63 | 5.80 |
2016.32 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
2016.33 | 2.51 | 0.07 |
2016.34 | -0.50 | -1.49 |
2016.35 | -1.03 | -2.52 |
2016.36 | 1.94 | 1.66 |
2016.37 | 2.55 | 2.50 |
2016.38 | 0.40 | -1.74 |
2016.39 | 2.14 | 4.61 |
2016.4 | 0.31 | -2.58 |
2016.41 | -4.26 | -7.57 |
2016.42 | 2.63 | 2.98 |
2016.43 | -1.57 | -6.13 |
2016.44 | -4.01 | -2.14 |
2016.45 | 0.45 | -1.90 |
2016.46 | -1.14 | -2.72 |
2016.47 | 3.15 | 5.34 |
2016.48 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
2016.49 | -2.48 | -6.53 |
2016.5 | 1.18 | 1.08 |
2016.51 | -0.56 | -1.15 |
2016.52 | -4.06 | -6.69 |
2017.01 | -0.82 | 0.56 |
2017.02 | -5.77 | -7.23 |
2017.03 | 0.75 | 10.91 |
2017.04 | 4.91 | 7.74 |
2017.05 | -4.67 | -6.93 |
2017.06 | 1.56 | -1.07 |
2017.07 | 0.35 | 0.45 |
2017.08 | -1.32 | -5.12 |
2017.09 | -3.08 | -6.53 |
2017.1 | -0.07 | 1.77 |
2017.11 | 2.41 | 11.69 |
2017.12 | -0.43 | -7.26 |
2017.13 | 4.09 | 3.60 |
2017.14 | -2.56 | -4.91 |
2017.15 | 3.82 | 4.78 |
2017.16 | 0.81 | 2.42 |
2017.17 | 1.37 | 1.95 |
2017.18 | -1.85 | -4.99 |
2017.19 | 2.70 | 1.13 |
2017.2 | -3.52 | -4.13 |
2017.21 | 1.96 | 0.15 |
2017.22 | -2.89 | -7.05 |
2017.23 | -0.11 | -4.31 |
2017.24 | -2.87 | -4.07 |
2017.25 | -3.08 | -4.19 |
2017.26 | -0.96 | -4.67 |
2017.27 | -1.95 | -6.75 |
2017.28 | 1.72 | 12.69 |
2017.29 | -0.40 | 1.30 |
2017.3 | 0.55 | 7.63 |
2017.31 | 2.54 | 1.03 |
2017.32 | 0.62 | -1.55 |
2017.33 | -0.40 | -3.05 |
2017.34 | -0.66 | 3.25 |
2017.35 | -3.40 | 3.86 |
2017.36 | 1.35 | 2.30 |
2017.37 | -0.99 | 10.94 |
2017.38 | -2.63 | -10.46 |
2017.39 | -8.70 | -5.66 |
2017.4 | -19.79 | -18.66 |
2017.41 | 5.33 | 9.99 |
2017.42 | -6.63 | -7.68 |
2017.43 | 11.25 | 13.61 |
2017.44 | -3.07 | -8.20 |
2017.45 | -7.71 | -6.40 |
2017.46 | -8.19 | -20.03 |
2017.47 | 13.29 | 25.04 |
2017.48 | -2.39 | -0.34 |
2017.49 | 1.20 | -6.79 |
2017.5 | -0.09 | 2.69 |
2017.51 | -1.17 | -2.55 |
2017.52 | 6.66 | -0.29 |
The graph of the relative strength for S&P 500 and FB is plotted as shown below.
Using the price movements and their changing speed, the relative strength of the fund against the S&P 500 can be measured.
(b)
To determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio exceeds by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial increase the banking sector outperforms S&P500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Answer to Problem 24PS
As per the data, 16 times the relative strength increases more than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 16 times when the relative strength increases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here, it is seen that 10 times the FSRBX underperformed the S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
There are 6 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
(c)
Requirement 3 To Determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio decreases by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial decrease the banking sector outperforms S&P 500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P 500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Answer to Problem 24PS
As per the data, 31 times the relative strength moves decrease by greater than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 31 times when the relative strength decreases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here it is seen that 17 times the FSRBX underperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
There are 14 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
(d)
Requirement 4 To Determine:
To determine how well the relative strength rule functions in identifying the selling or buying opportunities.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.

Answer to Problem 24PS
The data above gives the bullish sign and the bearish sign.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
We can see the relative strength depicted in second part of requirement as bullish sign. Here the FB fund is likely to underperform the S&P 500 index than to perform better than the index according to this signal.
We can see the relative strength depicted in third part of requirement as bearish sign. Here the FB fund did not give a better performance than the index but there is no statistical difference succeeding the considerable change in the relative strength. There is random successive performance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
INVESTMENTS(LL)W/CONNECT
- No chatgptPlease don't answer i will give unhelpful all expert giving wrong answer he is giving answer with using incorrect values.arrow_forwardPlease don't answer i will give unhelpful all expert giving wrong answer he is giving answer with incorrect data.arrow_forward4. On August 20, Mr. and Mrs. Cleaver decided to buy a property from Mr. and Mrs. Ward for $105,000. On August 30, Mr. and Mrs. Cleaver obtained a loan commitment from OKAY National Bank for an $84,000 conventional loan at 5 percent for 30 years. The lender informs Mr. and Mrs. Cleaver that a $2,100 loan origination fee will be required to obtain the loan. The loan closing is to take place September 22. In addition, escrow accounts will be required for all prorated property taxes and hazard insurance; however, no mortgage insurance is necessary. The buyer will also pay a full year's premium for hazard insurance to Rock of Gibraltar Insurance Company. A breakdown of expected settlement costs, provided by OKAY National Bank when Mr. and Mrs. Cleaver inspect the uniform settlement statement as required under RESPA on September 21, is as follows: I. Transactions between buyer-borrower and third parties: a. Recording fees--mortgage b. Real estate transfer tax c. Recording fees/document…arrow_forward
- finance subjectarrow_forwardCould you help explain, what is the complete salary survey analysis, and ensuring the data is relevant and up-to-date? What is the job evaluation and compensation plan? How to ensure the final report is comprehensive, clearly structured, and aligned with the company vision?arrow_forwardThe maturity value of an $35,000 non-interest-bearing, simple discount 4%, 120-day note is:arrow_forward
- Carl Sonntag wanted to compare what proceeds he would receive with a simple interest note versus a simple discount note. Both had the same terms: $18,905 at 10% for 4 years. Use ordinary interest as needed. Calculate the simple interest note proceeds. Calculate the simple discount note proceeds.arrow_forwardWhat you're solving for Solving for maturity value, discount period, bank discount, and proceeds of a note. What's given in the problem Face value: $55300 Rate of interest: 10% Length of note: 95 days Date of note: August 23rd Date note discounted: September 18th Bank discount rate:9 percentarrow_forwardAll tutor giving incorrect solnarrow_forward
- Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College
