(a)
To determine:
To set the spreadsheet for calculating the relative strength of the banking sector compared to the broad market.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
The spreadsheet is obtained and given in explanation.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data given in the website. The initial value of the sector index and S&P 500 Index is equal to 100. Each week's
The data was downloaded from the given website.
Week | SPY rate | FSRBX rate |
2013.01 | 1.64 | 1.75 |
2013.02 | 0.17 | 0.55 |
2013.03 | -0.82 | -0.92 |
2013.04 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
2013.05 | 0.59 | 0.92 |
2013.06 | -0.21 | -0.08 |
2013.07 | 0.12 | 1.37 |
2013.08 | 1.19 | 1.80 |
2013.09 | -3.27 | -2.73 |
2013.10 | -1.00 | -0.58 |
2013.11 | -0.03 | -0.87 |
2013.12 | 3.25 | 1.09 |
2013.13 | -0.23 | -0.21 |
2013.14 | -0.47 | -3.37 |
2013.15 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
2013.16 | -2.97 | -1.55 |
2013.17 | -0.91 | -1.75 |
2013.18 | 0.07 | 0.40 |
2013.19 | -0.20 | 1.11 |
2013.20 | 2.77 | 2.50 |
2013.21 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
2013.22 | 1.21 | 0.38 |
2013.23 | -0.27 | -0.89 |
2013.24 | 0.19 | 0.52 |
2013.25 | -0.85 | -0.17 |
2013.26 | -1.02 | -1.16 |
2013.27 | -0.92 | 0.04 |
2013.28 | -1.57 | 0.04 |
2013.29 | 1.72 | 0.95 |
2013.30 | -3.60 | -1.97 |
2013.31 | 0.32 | 0.83 |
2013.32 | 3.07 | 3.47 |
2013.33 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
2013.34 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
2013.35 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
2013.36 | 0.50 | 0.21 |
2013.37 | -1.49 | -1.72 |
2013.38 | 1.96 | 2.08 |
2013.39 | -1.00 | 0.16 |
2013.40 | -1.11 | -0.37 |
2013.41 | -1.13 | -1.51 |
2013.42 | 2.91 | 3.28 |
2013.43 | 3.61 | 2.73 |
2013.44 | 1.29 | 1.60 |
2013.45 | -0.86 | -2.16 |
2013.46 | 0.79 | 1.18 |
2013.47 | 0.76 | 0.19 |
2013.48 | 0.06 | -0.19 |
2013.49 | 0.57 | 0.04 |
2013.50 | 1.11 | 1.83 |
2013.51 | 0.08 | -0.15 |
2013.52 | -2.01 | -2.22 |
2014.01 | -0.17 | -1.56 |
2014.02 | -1.24 | 0.16 |
2014.03 | 0.56 | -0.28 |
2014.04 | 2.38 | 2.74 |
2014.05 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
2014.06 | -0.32 | -2.45 |
2014.07 | 0.87 | 0.36 |
2014.08 | 1.07 | 1.63 |
2014.09 | -1.91 | -1.87 |
2014.10 | -1.15 | -1.23 |
2014.11 | -1.18 | -2.58 |
2014.12 | 0.25 | 0.29 |
2014.13 | 0.48 | 0.66 |
2014.14 | -3.26 | -2.29 |
2014.15 | 1.24 | 0.75 |
2014.16 | 0.16 | 1.54 |
2014.17 | 1.15 | 0.78 |
2014.18 | -1.17 | -1.30 |
2014.19 | 2.93 | 3.13 |
2014.20 | 0.96 | -0.52 |
2014.21 | -0.09 | -0.36 |
2014.22 | 0.05 | -0.04 |
2014.23 | 1.37 | 1.65 |
2014.24 | -1.96 | -1.07 |
2014.25 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
2014.26 | 1.49 | 1.19 |
2014.27 | 1.26 | 1.65 |
2014.28 | 0.57 | 0.35 |
2014.29 | 0.16 | -0.92 |
2014.30 | -0.69 | -1.24 |
2014.31 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
2014.32 | -0.47 | 0.39 |
2014.33 | -1.39 | -1.92 |
2014.34 | 1.24 | 1.00 |
2014.35 | 1.91 | 0.63 |
2014.36 | -0.46 | 0.08 |
2014.37 | -1.67 | -2.36 |
2014.38 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
2014.39 | -2.79 | -1.73 |
2014.40 | -0.78 | 0.04 |
2014.41 | -0.45 | 1.02 |
2014.42 | 1.41 | 2.23 |
2014.43 | 1.93 | 1.03 |
2014.44 | 1.35 | 3.02 |
2014.45 | 1.10 | -0.19 |
2014.46 | 1.60 | 1.72 |
2014.47 | -0.22 | -0.68 |
2014.48 | -0.41 | -0.38 |
2014.49 | 0.55 | 0.72 |
2014.50 | 0.31 | 0.19 |
2014.51 | -1.77 | -1.73 |
2014.52 | 3.15 | 2.41 |
2015.01 | 0.19 | -0.52 |
2015.02 | -2.10 | -2.89 |
2015.03 | 2.04 | 2.59 |
2015.04 | -1.76 | -1.81 |
2015.05 | 0.29 | 0.81 |
2015.06 | 1.72 | 1.71 |
2015.07 | 0.47 | 1.35 |
2015.08 | -0.50 | -1.07 |
2015.09 | -0.13 | 0.07 |
2015.1 | 1.99 | 2.13 |
2015.11 | -0.32 | -0.51 |
2015.12 | -0.29 | -0.66 |
2015.13 | -0.23 | -0.04 |
2015.14 | -0.64 | -0.41 |
2015.15 | 1.90 | 1.37 |
2015.16 | 0.24 | 3.11 |
2015.17 | 0.80 | 0.57 |
2015.18 | -2.48 | -2.76 |
2015.19 | -1.66 | -1.49 |
2015.2 | 1.01 | 0.59 |
2015.21 | 0.48 | 1.06 |
2015.22 | -2.83 | -0.80 |
2015.23 | -0.12 | -1.72 |
2015.24 | -0.17 | -1.60 |
2015.25 | 2.29 | 2.08 |
2015.26 | -0.53 | -0.11 |
2015.27 | -2.44 | -1.30 |
2015.28 | 0.34 | 2.67 |
2015.29 | 3.25 | 2.31 |
2015.3 | 0.17 | 0.72 |
2015.31 | -0.93 | -1.99 |
2015.32 | 2.89 | 1.88 |
2015.33 | -0.67 | -1.14 |
2015.34 | 1.23 | 0.54 |
2015.35 | -0.86 | -0.54 |
2015.36 | 1.73 | 1.80 |
2015.37 | -0.38 | -0.25 |
2015.38 | 1.61 | 0.78 |
2015.39 | 1.08 | 0.67 |
2015.4 | 1.20 | 0.87 |
2015.41 | 0.15 | -1.21 |
2015.42 | 0.78 | 0.28 |
2015.43 | -1.00 | -1.01 |
2015.44 | 1.25 | 1.62 |
2015.45 | 1.58 | 0.28 |
2015.46 | -0.05 | -0.62 |
2015.47 | -0.09 | -0.49 |
2015.48 | 0.85 | 1.12 |
2015.49 | 0.65 | 2.04 |
2015.5 | -1.11 | 0.03 |
2015.51 | 0.62 | 0.34 |
2015.52 | -0.76 | -0.74 |
2016.01 | 1.92 | 0.34 |
2016.02 | -0.29 | -0.65 |
2016.03 | -0.48 | -0.27 |
2016.04 | 1.88 | 1.78 |
2016.05 | -0.60 | -0.20 |
2016.06 | 1.24 | 1.82 |
2016.07 | -0.29 | -0.50 |
2016.08 | -4.57 | -4.10 |
2016.09 | 1.52 | 0.35 |
2016.1 | -1.21 | -1.77 |
2016.11 | 3.51 | 3.45 |
2016.12 | -0.97 | -2.21 |
2016.13 | 1.58 | -0.31 |
2016.14 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
2016.15 | 2.27 | 3.50 |
2016.16 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
2016.17 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
2016.18 | -0.03 | 0.34 |
2016.19 | 1.16 | 0.60 |
2016.2 | -0.61 | -0.97 |
2016.21 | 1.57 | 0.84 |
2016.22 | -1.97 | -2.20 |
2016.23 | 1.78 | 1.47 |
2016.24 | -1.64 | -2.55 |
2016.25 | -0.08 | -0.41 |
2016.26 | 1.70 | 1.18 |
2016.27 | 1.22 | 0.24 |
2016.28 | -0.87 | -3.31 |
2016.29 | -5.46 | -5.40 |
2016.3 | -0.90 | -4.03 |
2016.31 | 0.63 | 5.80 |
2016.32 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
2016.33 | 2.51 | 0.07 |
2016.34 | -0.50 | -1.49 |
2016.35 | -1.03 | -2.52 |
2016.36 | 1.94 | 1.66 |
2016.37 | 2.55 | 2.50 |
2016.38 | 0.40 | -1.74 |
2016.39 | 2.14 | 4.61 |
2016.4 | 0.31 | -2.58 |
2016.41 | -4.26 | -7.57 |
2016.42 | 2.63 | 2.98 |
2016.43 | -1.57 | -6.13 |
2016.44 | -4.01 | -2.14 |
2016.45 | 0.45 | -1.90 |
2016.46 | -1.14 | -2.72 |
2016.47 | 3.15 | 5.34 |
2016.48 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
2016.49 | -2.48 | -6.53 |
2016.5 | 1.18 | 1.08 |
2016.51 | -0.56 | -1.15 |
2016.52 | -4.06 | -6.69 |
2017.01 | -0.82 | 0.56 |
2017.02 | -5.77 | -7.23 |
2017.03 | 0.75 | 10.91 |
2017.04 | 4.91 | 7.74 |
2017.05 | -4.67 | -6.93 |
2017.06 | 1.56 | -1.07 |
2017.07 | 0.35 | 0.45 |
2017.08 | -1.32 | -5.12 |
2017.09 | -3.08 | -6.53 |
2017.1 | -0.07 | 1.77 |
2017.11 | 2.41 | 11.69 |
2017.12 | -0.43 | -7.26 |
2017.13 | 4.09 | 3.60 |
2017.14 | -2.56 | -4.91 |
2017.15 | 3.82 | 4.78 |
2017.16 | 0.81 | 2.42 |
2017.17 | 1.37 | 1.95 |
2017.18 | -1.85 | -4.99 |
2017.19 | 2.70 | 1.13 |
2017.2 | -3.52 | -4.13 |
2017.21 | 1.96 | 0.15 |
2017.22 | -2.89 | -7.05 |
2017.23 | -0.11 | -4.31 |
2017.24 | -2.87 | -4.07 |
2017.25 | -3.08 | -4.19 |
2017.26 | -0.96 | -4.67 |
2017.27 | -1.95 | -6.75 |
2017.28 | 1.72 | 12.69 |
2017.29 | -0.40 | 1.30 |
2017.3 | 0.55 | 7.63 |
2017.31 | 2.54 | 1.03 |
2017.32 | 0.62 | -1.55 |
2017.33 | -0.40 | -3.05 |
2017.34 | -0.66 | 3.25 |
2017.35 | -3.40 | 3.86 |
2017.36 | 1.35 | 2.30 |
2017.37 | -0.99 | 10.94 |
2017.38 | -2.63 | -10.46 |
2017.39 | -8.70 | -5.66 |
2017.4 | -19.79 | -18.66 |
2017.41 | 5.33 | 9.99 |
2017.42 | -6.63 | -7.68 |
2017.43 | 11.25 | 13.61 |
2017.44 | -3.07 | -8.20 |
2017.45 | -7.71 | -6.40 |
2017.46 | -8.19 | -20.03 |
2017.47 | 13.29 | 25.04 |
2017.48 | -2.39 | -0.34 |
2017.49 | 1.20 | -6.79 |
2017.5 | -0.09 | 2.69 |
2017.51 | -1.17 | -2.55 |
2017.52 | 6.66 | -0.29 |
The graph of the relative strength for S&P 500 and FB is plotted as shown below.
Using the price movements and their changing speed, the relative strength of the fund against the S&P 500 can be measured.
(b)
To determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio exceeds by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial increase the banking sector outperforms S&P500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
As per the data, 16 times the relative strength increases more than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 16 times when the relative strength increases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here, it is seen that 10 times the FSRBX underperformed the S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
There are 6 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
(c)
Requirement 3 To Determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio decreases by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial decrease the banking sector outperforms S&P 500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P 500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
As per the data, 31 times the relative strength moves decrease by greater than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 31 times when the relative strength decreases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here it is seen that 17 times the FSRBX underperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
There are 14 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
(d)
Requirement 4 To Determine:
To determine how well the relative strength rule functions in identifying the selling or buying opportunities.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
The data above gives the bullish sign and the bearish sign.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
We can see the relative strength depicted in second part of requirement as bullish sign. Here the FB fund is likely to underperform the S&P 500 index than to perform better than the index according to this signal.
We can see the relative strength depicted in third part of requirement as bearish sign. Here the FB fund did not give a better performance than the index but there is no statistical difference succeeding the considerable change in the relative strength. There is random successive performance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
EBK INVESTMENTS
- How has AirBnb negatively affected the US and global economy? How has Airbnb negatively affected the real estate market? How has Airbnb negatively affected homeowners and renters market? What happened to Airbnb in the Tax Dispute in Italy?arrow_forwardHow has AirBnb positively affected the US and global economy? How has Airbnb positively affected the real estate market? How has Airbnb positively affected homeowners and renters market?arrow_forwardD. (1) Consider the following cash inflows of a financial product. Given that the market interest rate is 12%, what price would you pay for these cash flows? Year 0 1 2 3 4 Cash Flow 160 170 180 230arrow_forward
- Explain why financial institutions generally engage in foreign exchange tradingactivities. Provide specific purposes or motivations behind such activities.arrow_forwardA. In 2008, during the global financial crisis, Lehman Brothers, one of the largest investment banks, collapsed and defaulted on its corporate bonds, causing significant losses for bondholders. This event highlighted several risks that investors in corporate bonds might face. What are the key risks an investor would encounter when investing in corporate bonds? Explain these risks with examples or academic references. [15 Marks]arrow_forwardTwo companies, Blue Plc and Yellow Plc, have bonds yielding 4% and 5.3%respectively. Blue Plc has a credit rating of AA, while Yellow Plc holds a BB rating. If youwere a risk-averse investor, which bond would you choose? Explain your reasoning withacademic references.arrow_forward
- B. Using the probabilities and returns listed below, calculate the expected return and standard deviation for Sparrow Plc and Hawk Plc, then justify which company a risk- averse investor might choose. Firm Sparrow Plc Hawk Plc Outcome Probability Return 1 50% 8% 2 50% 22% 1 30% 15% 2 70% 20%arrow_forward(2) Why are long-term bonds more susceptible to interest rate risk than short-term bonds? Provide examples to explain. [10 Marks]arrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardScenario one: Under what circumstances would it be appropriate for a firm to use different cost of capital for its different operating divisions? If the overall firm WACC was used as the hurdle rate for all divisions, would the riskier division or the more conservative divisions tend to get most of the investment projects? Why? If you were to try to estimate the appropriate cost of capital for different divisions, what problems might you encounter? What are two techniques you could use to develop a rough estimate for each division’s cost of capital?arrow_forwardScenario three: If a portfolio has a positive investment in every asset, can the expected return on a portfolio be greater than that of every asset in the portfolio? Can it be less than that of every asset in the portfolio? If you answer yes to one of both of these questions, explain and give an example for your answer(s). Please Provide a Referencearrow_forward
- Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage Learning