(a)
To determine:
To set the spreadsheet for calculating the relative strength of the banking sector compared to the broad market.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
The spreadsheet is obtained and given in explanation.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data given in the website. The initial value of the sector index and S&P 500 Index is equal to 100. Each week's
The data was downloaded from the given website.
Week | SPY rate | FSRBX rate |
2013.01 | 1.64 | 1.75 |
2013.02 | 0.17 | 0.55 |
2013.03 | -0.82 | -0.92 |
2013.04 | 0.85 | 0.93 |
2013.05 | 0.59 | 0.92 |
2013.06 | -0.21 | -0.08 |
2013.07 | 0.12 | 1.37 |
2013.08 | 1.19 | 1.80 |
2013.09 | -3.27 | -2.73 |
2013.10 | -1.00 | -0.58 |
2013.11 | -0.03 | -0.87 |
2013.12 | 3.25 | 1.09 |
2013.13 | -0.23 | -0.21 |
2013.14 | -0.47 | -3.37 |
2013.15 | 0.47 | 0.00 |
2013.16 | -2.97 | -1.55 |
2013.17 | -0.91 | -1.75 |
2013.18 | 0.07 | 0.40 |
2013.19 | -0.20 | 1.11 |
2013.20 | 2.77 | 2.50 |
2013.21 | 0.11 | 0.04 |
2013.22 | 1.21 | 0.38 |
2013.23 | -0.27 | -0.89 |
2013.24 | 0.19 | 0.52 |
2013.25 | -0.85 | -0.17 |
2013.26 | -1.02 | -1.16 |
2013.27 | -0.92 | 0.04 |
2013.28 | -1.57 | 0.04 |
2013.29 | 1.72 | 0.95 |
2013.30 | -3.60 | -1.97 |
2013.31 | 0.32 | 0.83 |
2013.32 | 3.07 | 3.47 |
2013.33 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
2013.34 | 0.59 | 0.58 |
2013.35 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
2013.36 | 0.50 | 0.21 |
2013.37 | -1.49 | -1.72 |
2013.38 | 1.96 | 2.08 |
2013.39 | -1.00 | 0.16 |
2013.40 | -1.11 | -0.37 |
2013.41 | -1.13 | -1.51 |
2013.42 | 2.91 | 3.28 |
2013.43 | 3.61 | 2.73 |
2013.44 | 1.29 | 1.60 |
2013.45 | -0.86 | -2.16 |
2013.46 | 0.79 | 1.18 |
2013.47 | 0.76 | 0.19 |
2013.48 | 0.06 | -0.19 |
2013.49 | 0.57 | 0.04 |
2013.50 | 1.11 | 1.83 |
2013.51 | 0.08 | -0.15 |
2013.52 | -2.01 | -2.22 |
2014.01 | -0.17 | -1.56 |
2014.02 | -1.24 | 0.16 |
2014.03 | 0.56 | -0.28 |
2014.04 | 2.38 | 2.74 |
2014.05 | 0.45 | -0.39 |
2014.06 | -0.32 | -2.45 |
2014.07 | 0.87 | 0.36 |
2014.08 | 1.07 | 1.63 |
2014.09 | -1.91 | -1.87 |
2014.10 | -1.15 | -1.23 |
2014.11 | -1.18 | -2.58 |
2014.12 | 0.25 | 0.29 |
2014.13 | 0.48 | 0.66 |
2014.14 | -3.26 | -2.29 |
2014.15 | 1.24 | 0.75 |
2014.16 | 0.16 | 1.54 |
2014.17 | 1.15 | 0.78 |
2014.18 | -1.17 | -1.30 |
2014.19 | 2.93 | 3.13 |
2014.20 | 0.96 | -0.52 |
2014.21 | -0.09 | -0.36 |
2014.22 | 0.05 | -0.04 |
2014.23 | 1.37 | 1.65 |
2014.24 | -1.96 | -1.07 |
2014.25 | 0.46 | 0.80 |
2014.26 | 1.49 | 1.19 |
2014.27 | 1.26 | 1.65 |
2014.28 | 0.57 | 0.35 |
2014.29 | 0.16 | -0.92 |
2014.30 | -0.69 | -1.24 |
2014.31 | 0.14 | 0.04 |
2014.32 | -0.47 | 0.39 |
2014.33 | -1.39 | -1.92 |
2014.34 | 1.24 | 1.00 |
2014.35 | 1.91 | 0.63 |
2014.36 | -0.46 | 0.08 |
2014.37 | -1.67 | -2.36 |
2014.38 | 1.32 | -0.08 |
2014.39 | -2.79 | -1.73 |
2014.40 | -0.78 | 0.04 |
2014.41 | -0.45 | 1.02 |
2014.42 | 1.41 | 2.23 |
2014.43 | 1.93 | 1.03 |
2014.44 | 1.35 | 3.02 |
2014.45 | 1.10 | -0.19 |
2014.46 | 1.60 | 1.72 |
2014.47 | -0.22 | -0.68 |
2014.48 | -0.41 | -0.38 |
2014.49 | 0.55 | 0.72 |
2014.50 | 0.31 | 0.19 |
2014.51 | -1.77 | -1.73 |
2014.52 | 3.15 | 2.41 |
2015.01 | 0.19 | -0.52 |
2015.02 | -2.10 | -2.89 |
2015.03 | 2.04 | 2.59 |
2015.04 | -1.76 | -1.81 |
2015.05 | 0.29 | 0.81 |
2015.06 | 1.72 | 1.71 |
2015.07 | 0.47 | 1.35 |
2015.08 | -0.50 | -1.07 |
2015.09 | -0.13 | 0.07 |
2015.1 | 1.99 | 2.13 |
2015.11 | -0.32 | -0.51 |
2015.12 | -0.29 | -0.66 |
2015.13 | -0.23 | -0.04 |
2015.14 | -0.64 | -0.41 |
2015.15 | 1.90 | 1.37 |
2015.16 | 0.24 | 3.11 |
2015.17 | 0.80 | 0.57 |
2015.18 | -2.48 | -2.76 |
2015.19 | -1.66 | -1.49 |
2015.2 | 1.01 | 0.59 |
2015.21 | 0.48 | 1.06 |
2015.22 | -2.83 | -0.80 |
2015.23 | -0.12 | -1.72 |
2015.24 | -0.17 | -1.60 |
2015.25 | 2.29 | 2.08 |
2015.26 | -0.53 | -0.11 |
2015.27 | -2.44 | -1.30 |
2015.28 | 0.34 | 2.67 |
2015.29 | 3.25 | 2.31 |
2015.3 | 0.17 | 0.72 |
2015.31 | -0.93 | -1.99 |
2015.32 | 2.89 | 1.88 |
2015.33 | -0.67 | -1.14 |
2015.34 | 1.23 | 0.54 |
2015.35 | -0.86 | -0.54 |
2015.36 | 1.73 | 1.80 |
2015.37 | -0.38 | -0.25 |
2015.38 | 1.61 | 0.78 |
2015.39 | 1.08 | 0.67 |
2015.4 | 1.20 | 0.87 |
2015.41 | 0.15 | -1.21 |
2015.42 | 0.78 | 0.28 |
2015.43 | -1.00 | -1.01 |
2015.44 | 1.25 | 1.62 |
2015.45 | 1.58 | 0.28 |
2015.46 | -0.05 | -0.62 |
2015.47 | -0.09 | -0.49 |
2015.48 | 0.85 | 1.12 |
2015.49 | 0.65 | 2.04 |
2015.5 | -1.11 | 0.03 |
2015.51 | 0.62 | 0.34 |
2015.52 | -0.76 | -0.74 |
2016.01 | 1.92 | 0.34 |
2016.02 | -0.29 | -0.65 |
2016.03 | -0.48 | -0.27 |
2016.04 | 1.88 | 1.78 |
2016.05 | -0.60 | -0.20 |
2016.06 | 1.24 | 1.82 |
2016.07 | -0.29 | -0.50 |
2016.08 | -4.57 | -4.10 |
2016.09 | 1.52 | 0.35 |
2016.1 | -1.21 | -1.77 |
2016.11 | 3.51 | 3.45 |
2016.12 | -0.97 | -2.21 |
2016.13 | 1.58 | -0.31 |
2016.14 | 0.74 | -0.24 |
2016.15 | 2.27 | 3.50 |
2016.16 | 0.61 | -0.30 |
2016.17 | 0.93 | 0.95 |
2016.18 | -0.03 | 0.34 |
2016.19 | 1.16 | 0.60 |
2016.2 | -0.61 | -0.97 |
2016.21 | 1.57 | 0.84 |
2016.22 | -1.97 | -2.20 |
2016.23 | 1.78 | 1.47 |
2016.24 | -1.64 | -2.55 |
2016.25 | -0.08 | -0.41 |
2016.26 | 1.70 | 1.18 |
2016.27 | 1.22 | 0.24 |
2016.28 | -0.87 | -3.31 |
2016.29 | -5.46 | -5.40 |
2016.3 | -0.90 | -4.03 |
2016.31 | 0.63 | 5.80 |
2016.32 | 0.00 | 3.71 |
2016.33 | 2.51 | 0.07 |
2016.34 | -0.50 | -1.49 |
2016.35 | -1.03 | -2.52 |
2016.36 | 1.94 | 1.66 |
2016.37 | 2.55 | 2.50 |
2016.38 | 0.40 | -1.74 |
2016.39 | 2.14 | 4.61 |
2016.4 | 0.31 | -2.58 |
2016.41 | -4.26 | -7.57 |
2016.42 | 2.63 | 2.98 |
2016.43 | -1.57 | -6.13 |
2016.44 | -4.01 | -2.14 |
2016.45 | 0.45 | -1.90 |
2016.46 | -1.14 | -2.72 |
2016.47 | 3.15 | 5.34 |
2016.48 | 1.52 | -0.24 |
2016.49 | -2.48 | -6.53 |
2016.5 | 1.18 | 1.08 |
2016.51 | -0.56 | -1.15 |
2016.52 | -4.06 | -6.69 |
2017.01 | -0.82 | 0.56 |
2017.02 | -5.77 | -7.23 |
2017.03 | 0.75 | 10.91 |
2017.04 | 4.91 | 7.74 |
2017.05 | -4.67 | -6.93 |
2017.06 | 1.56 | -1.07 |
2017.07 | 0.35 | 0.45 |
2017.08 | -1.32 | -5.12 |
2017.09 | -3.08 | -6.53 |
2017.1 | -0.07 | 1.77 |
2017.11 | 2.41 | 11.69 |
2017.12 | -0.43 | -7.26 |
2017.13 | 4.09 | 3.60 |
2017.14 | -2.56 | -4.91 |
2017.15 | 3.82 | 4.78 |
2017.16 | 0.81 | 2.42 |
2017.17 | 1.37 | 1.95 |
2017.18 | -1.85 | -4.99 |
2017.19 | 2.70 | 1.13 |
2017.2 | -3.52 | -4.13 |
2017.21 | 1.96 | 0.15 |
2017.22 | -2.89 | -7.05 |
2017.23 | -0.11 | -4.31 |
2017.24 | -2.87 | -4.07 |
2017.25 | -3.08 | -4.19 |
2017.26 | -0.96 | -4.67 |
2017.27 | -1.95 | -6.75 |
2017.28 | 1.72 | 12.69 |
2017.29 | -0.40 | 1.30 |
2017.3 | 0.55 | 7.63 |
2017.31 | 2.54 | 1.03 |
2017.32 | 0.62 | -1.55 |
2017.33 | -0.40 | -3.05 |
2017.34 | -0.66 | 3.25 |
2017.35 | -3.40 | 3.86 |
2017.36 | 1.35 | 2.30 |
2017.37 | -0.99 | 10.94 |
2017.38 | -2.63 | -10.46 |
2017.39 | -8.70 | -5.66 |
2017.4 | -19.79 | -18.66 |
2017.41 | 5.33 | 9.99 |
2017.42 | -6.63 | -7.68 |
2017.43 | 11.25 | 13.61 |
2017.44 | -3.07 | -8.20 |
2017.45 | -7.71 | -6.40 |
2017.46 | -8.19 | -20.03 |
2017.47 | 13.29 | 25.04 |
2017.48 | -2.39 | -0.34 |
2017.49 | 1.20 | -6.79 |
2017.5 | -0.09 | 2.69 |
2017.51 | -1.17 | -2.55 |
2017.52 | 6.66 | -0.29 |
The graph of the relative strength for S&P 500 and FB is plotted as shown below.
Using the price movements and their changing speed, the relative strength of the fund against the S&P 500 can be measured.
(b)
To determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio exceeds by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial increase the banking sector outperforms S&P500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
As per the data, 16 times the relative strength increases more than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 16 times when the relative strength increases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here, it is seen that 10 times the FSRBX underperformed the S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
There are 6 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the increase of more than 5%.
(c)
Requirement 3 To Determine:
To determine the instances where the relative strength ratio decreases by minimum 5% from its 5 weeks prior value and to determine the number of weeks immediately following the substantial decrease the banking sector outperforms S&P 500 and how many weeks banking sector underperforms S&P 500.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
As per the data, 31 times the relative strength moves decrease by greater than 5%.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
Of the 255 total instances, there are 31 times when the relative strength decreases by greater than 5% over the interval of 5 weeks.
Here it is seen that 17 times the FSRBX underperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
There are 14 times that FSRBX outperformed S&P 500 following the decrease of more than 5%.
(d)
Requirement 4 To Determine:
To determine how well the relative strength rule functions in identifying the selling or buying opportunities.
Introduction:
Relative strength helps to measure the extent to which a security has underperformed or it has outperformed its own industry or the entire market. Relative strength is a ratio of price of security to industry price index.
Answer to Problem 24PS
The data above gives the bullish sign and the bearish sign.
Explanation of Solution
Given Information:
The data is available in the given website.
We can see the relative strength depicted in second part of requirement as bullish sign. Here the FB fund is likely to underperform the S&P 500 index than to perform better than the index according to this signal.
We can see the relative strength depicted in third part of requirement as bearish sign. Here the FB fund did not give a better performance than the index but there is no statistical difference succeeding the considerable change in the relative strength. There is random successive performance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
INVESTMENTS-CONNECT PLUS ACCESS
- Consider a situation involving determining right and wrong. Do you believe utilitarianism provides a more objective viewpoint than moral rights in this context? Why or why not? How about when comparing utilitarianism to principles of justice? Share your thoughts. Reflect on this statement: "Every principle of distributive justice, whether that of the egalitarian, the capitalist, the socialist, the libertarian, or Rawls, in the end is illegitimately advocating some type of equality." Do you agree or disagree with this assertion? Why might someone claim this, and how would you respond?arrow_forwardI need help checking my spreadsheet. Q: Assume that Temp Force’s dividend is expected to experience supernormal growth of 73%from Year 0 to Year 1, 47% from Year 1 to Year 2, 32% from Year 2 to Year 3 and 21% from year3 to year 4. After Year 4, dividends will grow at a constant rate of 2.75%. What is the stock’sintrinsic value under these conditions? What are the expected dividend yield and capital gainsyield during the first year? What are the expected dividend yield and capital gains yield duringthe fifth year (from Year 4 to Year 5)?arrow_forwardwhat are the five components of case study design? Please help explain with examplesarrow_forward
- Commissions are usually charged when a right is exercised. a warrant is exercised. a right is sold. all of the above will have commissions A and B are correct, C is not correctarrow_forwardWhat is Exploratory Research Case Study? What is the main purpose of Exploratory Research?arrow_forwardplease help with how to solve this thank you.arrow_forward
- Question 25 Jasmine bought a house for $225 000. She already knows that for the first $200 000, the land transfer tax will cost $1650. Calculate the total land transfer tax. (2 marks) Land Transfer Tax Table Value of Property Rate On the first $30 000 0% On the next $60 000 0.5% (i.e., $30 001 to $90 000) On the next $60 000 1.0% (i.e., $90 001 to $150 000) On the next $50 000 1.5% (i.e., $150 001 to $200 000) On amounts in excess of $200 000 2.0% 22 5000–200 000. 10 825000 2.5000.00 2 x 25000 =8500 2 maarrow_forwardQuestion 25 Jasmine bought a house for $225 000. She already knows that for the first $200 000, the land transfer tax will cost $1650. Calculate the total land transfer tax. (2 marks) Land Transfer Tax Table Value of Property Rate On the first $30 000 0% On the next $60 000 0.5% (i.e., $30 001 to $90 000) On the next $60 000 1.0% (i.e., $90 001 to $150 000) On the next $50 000 1.5% (i.e., $150 001 to $200 000) On amounts in excess of $200 000 2.0% 225000–200 000 = 825000 25000.002 × 25000 1= 8500 16 50+ 500 2 marksarrow_forwardSuppose you deposit $1,000 today (t = 0) in a bank account that pays an interest rate of 7% per year. If you keep the account for 5 years before you withdraw all the money, how much will you be able to withdraw after 5 years? Calculate using formula. Calculate using year-by-year approach. Find the present value of a security that will pay $2,500 in 4 years. The opportunity cost (interest rate that you could earn from alternative investments) is 5%. Calculate using the formula. Calculate using year-by-year discounting approach. Solve for the unknown in each of the following: Present value Years Interest rate Future value $50,000 12 ? $152,184 $21,400 30 ? $575,000 $16,500 ? 14% $238,830 $21,400 ? 9% $213,000 Suppose you enter into a monthly deposit scheme with Chase, where you have your salary account. The bank will deduct $25 from your salary account every month and the first payment (deduction) will be made…arrow_forward
- Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College