Managerial Economics And Business Strategy 9th Edition (without Access Code)
Managerial Economics And Business Strategy 9th Edition (without Access Code)
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781260263176
Author: Michael R. Baye, Jeffrey T. Prince
Publisher: McGraw Hill
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 12, Problem 21PAA
To determine

To explain: The better investment between the two.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 21PAA

The better investment plan will be to invest in first fast food chain..

Explanation of Solution

From the two fast food chains, investment must be made in the franchise from where the expected value of profit is more and the risk associated with the investment is less.

The expected value of a variable is the sum of probabilities that different profits would be there multiplied with the resulting payoffs.

The aggregate 10 year profit by both the fast food giants is,

  E(π)=q1π1+q2π2+q3π3

Here, the profit is E the probability is q and the resulting payoffs is π .

Here, q1+q2+q3+...+qn=1

For first fast food chain the expected profit is,

  EM(π)=q1π1+q2π2+q3π3=(0.025)(48)+(0.95)(8)+(0.025)(48)=7.6

For second fast food chain the expected profit is,

  ES(π)=q1π1+q2π2+q3π3=(0.025)(48)+(0.95)(8)+(0.025)(48)=7.6

The variance is,

  σ2=q1[π1E(π)]2+q2[π2E(π)]2+q3[π3E(π)]2

Here, the variance is σ2 , the profit is E the probability is q and the resulting payoffs is π .

For first fast food chain the variance is,

  σ2=q1[π1E(π)]2+q2[π2E(π)]2+q3[π3E(π)]2=0.25[167.6]2+0.5[87.6]2+0.25[1.67.6]2=38.88

For second fast food chain the variance is,

  σ2=q1[π1E(π)]2+q2[π2E(π)]2+q3[π3E(π)]2=0.25[487.6]2+0.5[87.6]2+0.25[487.6]2=118.24

The expected profit for both is same, the risk associated with the investment in Subs is m ore than risk involved in McDonald’s on the account of higher variance in the former option

Hence, the better investment plan will be to invest in first fast food chain.

Economics Concept Introduction

The aggregate 10 year profit by both the fast food giants is,

  E(π)=q1π1+q2π2+q3π3

Here, the profit is E the probability is q and the resulting payoffs is π .

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Problem 1 Regression Discontinuity In the beginning of covid, the US government distributed covid stimulus payments. Suppose you are interested in the effect of receiving the full amount of the first stimulus payment on the total spending in dollars by single individuals in the month after receiving the payment. Single individuals with annual income below $75,00 received the full amount of the stimulus payment. You decide to use Regression Discontinuity to answer this question. The graph below shows the RD model. 3150 3100 3050 Total Spending in the month after receiving the stimulus payment 2950 3000 74000 74500 75000 75500 76000 Annual income a. What is the outcome? (5 points) b. What is the treatment? (5 points) C. What is the running variable? (5 points) d. What is the cutoff? (5 points) e. Who is in the treatment group and who is in the control group? (10 points) f. What is the discontinuity in the graph and how do you interpret it? (10 points) g. Explain a scenario which can…
Problem 2 Difference-in-Difference In the beginning of 2005, Minnesota increased the sales tax on alcohol. Suppose you are interested in studying the effect of the increase in sale taxes on alcohol on the number of car accidents due to drinking in Minnesota. Unlike Minnesota, Wisconsin did not change the sales tax on alcohol. You decide to use a Difference-in-difference (DID) Model. The numbers of car accidents in each state at the end of 2004 and 2005 are as follows: Year Number of car accidents in Minnesota Number of car accidents in Wisconsin 2004 2000 2500 2005 2500 3500 a. Which state is the treatment state and which state is the control state? (10 points) b. What is the change in the outcome for the treatment group between 2004 and 2005? (5 points) C. Can we interpret the change in the outcome for the treatment group between 2004 and 2005 as the causal effect of the policy on car accidents? Explain your answer. (10 points) d. What is the change in the outcome for the control…
Environmental Economics
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:Cengage
Text book image
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337091992
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Brief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...
Economics
ISBN:9781337091985
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co