
(a):
Cumulative distribution of income.
(a):

Explanation of Solution
The economic development is achieved when the economic price increases per head of the population in the economy. The unequal distribution of the economic price between the people in the economy causes the income inequality in the economy. The income inequality is the situation in the economy in which the major part of the income will be earned by a smaller proportion of the population and vice versa.
The cumulative share of income can be easily calculated by adding the share of income with each preceding level's cumulative share of income. Here, in this case, the percentage share of income for A for the lowest fifth is 17.7 percent. Since there are no preceding levels, the cumulative share would remain the same as 17.7 percent. The percentage share of income for the second lowest fifth is 19.9 percent. Thus, the cumulative share of the second lowest fifth will be summation of the percentage share of both lowest fifth and second lowest fifth, which can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the cumulative share of income for the second lowest fifth is calculated to be 37.6 percent. Similarly, the cumulative share of income can be calculated, and the table can be completed as follows:
A | B | |||
Percentage of families | Percentage share | Cumulative share | Percentage share | Cumulative share |
Lowest fifth | 17.7% | 17.7% | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Second lowest fifth | 19.9 | 37.6 | 14.2 | 23.2 |
Middle fifth | 20.4 | 58.0 | 17.5 | 40.7 |
Second highest fifth | 20.7 | 78.7 | 21.9 | 62.6 |
Highest fifth | 21.3 | 100.0 | 37.4 | 100.0 |
Income Inequality: The income inequality is the situation where most of the
(b):
Lorenz curve of the economy.
(b):

Explanation of Solution
The Lorenz curve is the graphical illustration of the distribution of wealth in the economy. It is drawn on the cumulative percentage of income against the cumulative percentage of the population. Thus, it shows the cumulative shares of income received by the family. Thus, based on the table above, the Lorenz curve can be constructed as follows:
(c):
Country with more equal distribution of income.
(c):

Explanation of Solution
From the Lorenz curve diagram, it can be identified that the line that lies more close to the line of equality has more equal distribution of income. From the diagram, it is identified that Lorenz curve of Country A is closest to the line of equality and thus, Country A has more equal income distribution.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Economics For Today
- Figure: Demand 3 If the two-firm oligopoly facing the market in this diagram is currently producing at the competitive output level and one of the firm reduces output by 4 units, the firms' profits would increase from 564596. O50524 50 to $48 O532 548arrow_forwardCan you show me how to do part d?arrow_forwardProblem Set#8 Part I You are the manager of a firm producing a good in a particular market environment. The following table details the price charged (P) and the total cost (TC) incurred by your firm at various production levels (Q). Price (P) $125 Quantity (Q) Total Cost (TC) 0 150 125 1 175 125 2 210 125 3 255 125 4 310 125 5 375 125 6 450 125 7 535 125 8 630 125 9 735 125 10 850 125 11 975 125 12 1,110 125 13 1,255 125 14 1,410 125 15 1,575 1. Based on the information provided in the table above, identify the type of market structure in which the firm operates. Explain your reasoning! 2. Add seven columns to the table above, one for each of the following variables: AFC, ATC, VC, AVC, MC, TR, and MRarrow_forward
- The table below presents the demand schedule and marginal costs facing a monopolist producer. a. Fill in the total revenue and marginal revenue columns. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. If you are entering any negative numbers be sure to include a negative sign (-) in front of those numbers. Leave no cells blank. Enter 0 if appropriate. Q 0 P ($) 8 TR ($) 0 MR ($) MC ($) 1 7 2 6 3 5 1 2 3 4 4 4 5 5 3 6 6 2 7 1 8 0 b. What is the profit-maximizing level of output? units c. What price will the monopolist charge to maximize profits? $ 7 8arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward1. Lisa has $48 per week set aside for coffees (x) and lunches (z). The price of coffee is $4 and lunches are $6. What is Lisa's budget line equation (with z on the left-hand side)? Graph the budget line, and show how it changes when the price of lunches rise to $8 (including intercepts). What is the new budget line equation? 2. Suppose utility for a consumer of movies (x) and golf (z) is U = 20x0.420.5. The consumer has set aside $1000 to consumer movies and golf for a year. a. If the price of movies is $20 and the price of golf is $40, what is the utility-maximizing consumption of movies and golf? b. Show the optimal consumption bundle on a graph, showing a budget line (with intercepts), a tangent indifference curve, and the optimal choice. 3. Sam has set aside $480 for entertainment this month, which is golf (x) and/or bowling (z). A round of golf is $40 and a night of bowling is $30. His utility function is U = 3x + 2z. a. What is his MRS? b. Solve for the optimal choice of golf…arrow_forward
- Question Seven There are specific applications of the hidden-action or moral hazard model. Consider employment contracts signed between a firm's owners and a manager who runs the firm on behalf of the owners. The manager is offered an employment contract which they can accept and decide how much effort, e ≥ 0, to exert. Suppose that an increase in effort, e, increases the firm's gross profit, not including payments to the manager, but is personally costly to the manager and the firm's gross profit, Пg, takes the following form: Пg = e +ε, ε~N(0,2). Let s denote the salary, which may depend on effort and/or gross profit, depending on what the owner can observe, offered as part of the contract between the owner and manager. Suppose that the manager is risk averse and has a utility function with respect to salary of the form: Aσ² U(W)=μ- 2 a) Derive the optimal result of the owner's expected net profit where there is full information and state what it implies. b) Suppose now that the…arrow_forward1. The IS/MP model assumes that the Fed sets the real interest rate at a given level Rt. Suppose the Fed adopts a monetary policy rule that instructs it how to change the real interest rate in response to short-run output. Let's call this a monetary policy rule (MPR): The parameter x is positive. Rt=+xY a) Redraw the IS/MP diagram replacing the MP curve with the MPR curve. Show how an aggregate demand shock affects output and interest rates in the short run. Use the IS and MPR equations to solve for the changes in output and the real interest rate. b) How does the change in a affect investment in the IS/MPR model? Explain how a tax cut affects short-run output and investment in this version of the short-run model. The effect on investment is called crowding out. c) Add the Phillips curve to complete the short-run model. Illustrate how the Fed's choice of large it makes reveals its trade off between inflation and output in the short run.arrow_forwardnot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- Fems A and B are duopolist producers of widgets. The cost function for producing widgets C(Q)-Q² The market demand function for widgets i Q-192P Qmeasures thousands of widgets per year, Competition in the widget market is described by the Coumot model Instructions: Round your answers to 2 decimal places a What are the firms' Nanh equbrium output? b. What is the resulting price? c. What do they each emp How does the price compare to marginal cost? Price is ck to marginal cost How do the price and the two fems' joint profit compare to the monopoly price and prof Compared to the monopoly price, the Cournot price is to sed. Compared to the monopoly profit, the joint profit of the two fems to selectarrow_forwardSuppose the marginal social cost of television sets is $100. This is constant and equal to the average cost of television sets. The annual demand for television sets is given by the following equation: Q = 200,000-500P, where Qis the quantity sold per year and P is the price of television sets. a) If television sets are sold in a perfectly competitive market, calculate the annual number sold. Under what circumstances will the market equilibrium be efficient? b) Show the losses in well-being each year that would result from a law limiting sales of television sets to 100,000 per year. Show the effect on the price, marginal social benefit, and marginal social cost of television sets. Show the net loss in well-being that will result from a complete ban on the sales of television sets. (show with graphs.)arrow_forwardrefer to exhibit 8.12 and identify each curve in the grapharrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxMicroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning





