![Macroeconomics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259915673/9781259915673_largeCoverImage.gif)
Downward sloping of aggregate demand curve.
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Explanation of Solution
The aggregate demand (AD) curve shows an inverse relation between
The aggregate demand curve slopes downward due to three reasons:
Real balance effect: A change in the price level produces the real balance effect. A rise in the price level, results in a decrease in the
Interest Rate Effect: Assuming the money supply in the economy to be fixed, rise in price level implies more money required for purchases and pay for inputs. So, an increase in money demanded would increase the price paid for it, that is. the interest rate. The rise in interest rate will increase the borrowing costs which decrease the investment expenditure. This will decrease the quantity of real output demanded, thus decreasing the aggregate demand.
Foreign Purchases Effect: It is one of the key reasons behind the sloping of the aggregate demand curve. When the domestic price level rises relative to foreign price levels, foreigners buy fewer domestic goods as it becomes more expensive and people (domestic) opt for more foreign goods. Therefore, the export of domestic goods decline and import of foreign goods rise. As a result, there will be a decline in the overall demand for our domestic output. Thus the aggregate quantity demanded of GDP will decline. This slopes the AD curve downwards.
The reasons for downward sloping of AD curve are different from the reason for downward sloping of demand curve of a single-product. Assuming, a constant money income, substitution effect can work on a single product, whereby dropping prices of a single product make it relatively cheaper product compared to the other products whose price have not been changed. Also, the consumer has become richer in real terms, as he could afford more of the product whose price has been declined. But with the AD curve, as all the prices are falling implies dropping of the price level, thus single product substitution effect is not applicable in AD curve. Also, while dealing with demand of a single product, money income is assumed to be fixed. But this assumption is not applicable in case of AD curve because with regard to the circular flow of the economy, lower prices indicate lower incomes. Thus a decline in the price level does not necessarily imply an increase in the nominal income of the economy as a whole since as prices are dropping, so are the receipts or revenue of the sellers.
Figure-1
The multiplier effect acts on the initial change in spending to generate an even greater shift in the aggregate demand curve.
For instance, Figure 1 shows how multiplier effect works on an increase in income expenditure. The initial increase in spending is reflected by the broken line of AD curve, and then multiplier effect shift the AD curve from AD1 to AD2.
Concept Introduction:
Aggregate Demand: It refers to the total value of the goods and services available for purchase at a particular price in a given period of time.
Multiplier effect: Multiplier refers to the ratio of change in the real GDP to the change in initial consumption at constant price rate. Multiplier is positively related to the marginal propensity to consumer and negatively related with the marginal propensity to save.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Macroeconomics
- 0000 Health Suppose that you graph nations' health expenditures against income and see that the US's point lies below others (like in the stylized figure below). From the graph below, it appears that the US is However, this may not be the case if_ Switzerland UK US HPF Health expenditures productively inefficient; The US has a population that prefers spending their resources on health productively efficient; The US has a population that prefers spending their resources on health productively efficient; The US has lower levels of inherent health, therefore it has its own HPF which is lower than the others. productively inefficient; The US has lower levels of inherent health, therefore it has its own HPF which is lower than the others.arrow_forwardPlease match the definition to the term that best fits. This occurs when less-risky people are more likely to enroll in health insurance. How much spent out-of-pocket before insurance kicks-in. When no more units of a good can be produced without decreasing the amount of another good or service The amount that the insurance company pays the customer when an insured event occurs. When an individuals income is state independent Behavior changes that occur before an insured event happens and make that event more likely to occur. The fraction of the medical bill that the consumer is responsible for. The fixed amount that is paid for a service at the time service is rendered. This occurs when marginal benefit of a good to a consumer is equal to marginal cost of production Behavior changes that occur after an insured event happens and make recovering from that event more expensive. Monthly fee to enroll in insurance The oversupply of low-quality goods, products, or contracts that results…arrow_forwardfor the 2nd part the last option got cut off, there is also a none of the above choice tooarrow_forward
- MCB MCA The figure to the right shows the marginal cost of pollution abatement for two firms, A and B. The firms were initially abating 36 units of pollution each. Now they can trade pollution permits at a price of $32. As a result, firm permits and firm B A permits. Both firms are now better off and their total saving will be (Enter your answer rounded to the nearest $ whole number.) Dollars per Unit ($) 44 32 20 The Efficiency of Tradable Pollution Permits 31 36 41 Quantity of Pollution Abatement k -6°C Mostly clear Nextarrow_forwardThe figure to the right shows the marginal costs of abatement for an industry's only two firms, A and B. These firms were initially abating 30 units of pollution (the vertical dashed line). Now they can trade permits. The market price for permits under which an efficient pollution abatement will be achieved is $ rounded to the nearest whole number.) 192 176- 160- (Enter your response 144- 128- 112- 96 80- 64- 48- 32- 16 0 0 MC MCB 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 12 Pollution Abatement -6°C Mostly clear Nextarrow_forwardThe figure shows the private and social marginal costs and the marginal benefit of producing paper. The marginal social net benefit derived from the production of paper is OA. maximized at an output level of 35 because that is where MCp equals MB. OB. maximized at an output level of 25 because that is where MCs equal MB. OC. zero at an output level of 25 because that is where MCs equals MB. OD. zero at an output level of 35 because that is where MCp equals MB Dollars per Unit 25 35 Quantity of Paper -6°C Mostly clear D=MB Next MCS MCarrow_forward
- Refer to the given figure. MB and MC represent the social marginal benefit and social marginal cost of pollution abatement. The total net benefit from the optimal level of pollution abatement is $ (Enter your response rounded to the nearest whole number.) D Dollars per Unit 0 MC 18 810 Pollution Abatement -6°C Mostly clear Next MBarrow_forwardSuppose that each firm pollutes 100 units and is given 70 pollution permits (i.e., each firm must reduce pollution by 30 units if they do not trade their permits). If firms are allowed to trade their permits, then the equilibrium price of permits will be and permits. and as a result of being able to trade their OA. $10; firm A buys 20 permits from firm B profits fall by $200 for A and rise by $200 for B OB. $10; firm A buys 20 permits from firm B profits rise by $40 for A and rise by $40 for B OC. $12; firm A sells 10 permits to firm B; profits rise by $40 for A and rise by $40 for B OD. $12, firm A buys 10 permits from firm B profits fall by $120 for A and rise by $120 for B E. None of the above Marginal Abatement Cost ($) 18 16- 4 12- 10- 8- MCA 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Pollution Abatement 90 -6°C Mostly clear Next M 40arrow_forwardConsider an economy in which there are two polluters: A and B. The marginal cost of pollution abatement curves are given in the diagram to the right. The total cost of reducing pollution by 60 units if it is done efficiently or $ equals $ if it is done by forcing each firm to reduce pollution by 30 units. OA. 925; 1125 OB. 900; 1100 OC. 850, 1050 OD. 800, 1000 OE. None of the above The efficient levels of pollution reduction can be achieved by using a pollution tax equal to $ unit A. 25 0 per MC 45 40 35 30- 25 20- 15 10- 5- Marginal Abatement Cost ($) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Pollution Abatement -6°C Mostly clear Next 90arrow_forward
- is initially abating Q units of pollution. Suppose that a system of tradeable pollution permits is introduced into this market and the equilibrium permit price is P* Firm B will sell permits to Firm A because OA. Firm A has lower costs of pollution abatement than Firm B. OB. Firm B's total cost of abating more pollution (area 1) is less than the revenue it earns from selling the permits (areas 5+3). OC. Firm B's total cost of abating more pollution (areas 3+1) is less than the revenue it earns from selling the permits (areas 5+3+1). OD. Firm B can buy the permits at a lower price than Firm A OE. the revenue Firm B earns from selling permits (areas 3+1) is greater than the cost it incurs from abating more pollution (area 1). Dollars per unit Q₁ Qo Q2 Pollution Abatement ил Next -6°C Mostly clear MCA MCBarrow_forwardThe accompanying diagrams show the marginal costs of pollution abatement for two firms, Firm 1 and Firm 2. If the government requires each firm to abate Q units of pollution, the social costs of this abatement OA. could be reduced further if Firm 2 increased abatement and Firm 1 reduced its abatement by the same amount OB. could be reduced further if each firm was required to abate more. OC. could be reduced further if each firm was allowed to pollute more. OD. would be minimized. WOE could be reduced further if Firm 1 increased abatement and Firm 2 reduced its abatement by the same amount. Dollars 5 Firm 1 MC1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Abatement Q Firm 2 6- MC2 E 屈 Dollars -6°C Mostly clear Nextarrow_forwardThe diagram to the right illustrates a competitive industry in which there is a negative production externality. If a tax equal to $20/unit (i.e., a tax equal to the marginal external cost) is imposed, then the net social benefit will OA. fall by area A+ C. OB. rise by area B+C. OC. fall by area C. OD. rise by area B. OE. None of the above. W Marginal Benefit, Marginal Cost ($) 50 MCS MCp 45 35 30- 25 20 15 10- 5 0- 0 B D 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 Quantity -6°C Mostly clear Nextarrow_forward
- Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337091992Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningBrief Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Cours...EconomicsISBN:9781337091985Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningExploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
- Macroeconomics: Principles and Policy (MindTap Co...EconomicsISBN:9781305280601Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. BlinderPublisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337091992/9781337091992_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337091985/9781337091985_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781544336329/9781544336329_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337111522/9781337111522_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305280601/9781305280601_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285859460/9781285859460_smallCoverImage.gif)