Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781305971509
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 12, Problem 1CQQ
To determine

Real GDP growth in the U.S.

Expert Solution & Answer
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 1CQQ

Option ‘b’ is the correct answer.

Explanation of Solution

Option (b)

In the United States over the past century, average income measured by real GDP per person has grown by about 2 percent per year and this rate of growth implies that average income doubles every 35 years and hence, because of this growth, most of the Americans enjoy much greater economic prosperity than before. Thus, option ‘b’ is correct.

Option (a)

The rate of growth of 2 percent in the U.S. economy over the past century implies that average income doubles every 35 years and not in every 14 years. So option ‘a’ is incorrect.

Option (c)

Over the past century, in the U.S., real GDP per person has grown by 2 percent which means it doubles every 35 years. So option ‘c’ is incorrect.

Option (d)

Over the past century, in the U.S., real GDP per person has grown by 2 percent and not by 5 percent. Hence option ‘d’ is incorrect.

Economics Concept Introduction

Concept Introduction:

GDP (Gross Domestic Product): Gross domestic product refers to the value of total goods and services produced in the given period of time within the boundaries.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Macroeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617390
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Survey of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781305260948
Author:Irvin B. Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning