Subpart (a):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
In this given scenario, fisherman is the only variable factor. When other things remain the same increasing the number of fisherman leads to reduce the productivity which is known as diminishing marginal productivity.
In the fish firm, all the factors can be varied according to the requirement. Thus, marginal productivity is constant for the fisherman in the firm.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (b):
Number of fishing person.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Minimum number of fish should catch is 2 per day. The number of fisherman fishing in the lake can be calculated as follows.
Thus, the number of fisherman catching fish in the lake is 4. Remaining one fisherman is working in the firm. Total number of fish catching is 10 units
Subpart (c):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
Total number of fish can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the respective values in equation (1) to calculate the total number of fish at 1 unit of fisher man.
Total fish is 5 units.
Marginal productivity can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the respective values in equation (2) to calculate the marginal productivity of fish at 2 unit of fisher man.
Total fish is 5 units.
Table -1 shows the marginal productivity of fisher in the lake that obtained by using equation (1).
Table -1
Total fisherman(a) | Catching fish per person
|
Total fish | Marginal productivity |
1 | 5 | 5 | - |
2 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
4 | 2 | 8 | –1 |
5 | 1 | 5 | –3 |
Profit maximizing output is occurred at the point where the marginal revenue is equal to or greater than the marginal cost. Since marginal productivity is closer to 2 at the number of fisherman is 2, two fishers should be catch the fish in lake. Remaining 3 fishermen should work in the farm. And remaining 3 people should produce fish the farm. Total production of fish can be calculated as follows.
Thus, total number of fish is 14.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (d):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
The value of tax should be equal to the marginal productivity of the fisherman. The marginal productivity of fishermen is 2 (Fisherman produces fish in the farm). Thus, the tax should be equal to $2. The marginal productivity for fisher man who working in the lake is equal to or greater than the tax amount $2. Thus, two fisher man catching fish in lake and rest of the fisherman produces fish in the farm.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (e):
Number of fish per person
Subpart (e):
Explanation of Solution
Number of fish per person as per the policy can be calculated as follows.
Thus, one fisherman gets 2.8 units of fish.
The person work in the farm produces only 32 units of fish and now receives additional 0.8 units of fish. On the other hand, the fisherman who works in the lake catches 4 per person. Now they are losing 1.2 units of fish. The policy makers opinion is that if there is no restriction, then fisherman in the lake would catch only 2 units of fish per fisherman.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics
- Suppose there are only two planets in the universe, Zenope and Zuranda. On each planet, its inhabitants consume two products—coffee and fried chicken. Each planet has an equal population. Producing solely coffee, Zenope can produce 50 units of coffee, while Zuranda can produce 80 units of coffee. Producing solely fried chicken, Zenope can produce 25 units, while Zuranda can produce 30 units. Fill in the remaining part of the table (be sure to label the units). Coffee Fried Chicken Opportunity Cost of 1unit of Coffee Opportunity Cost of 1 unit of Fried Chicken Zenope 50 units 25 units Zuranda 80 units 30 units 2. Which planet has the absolute advantage in coffee? 3. Which planet has the absolute advantage in fried chicken? 4. Which planet has the comparative advantage in coffee? 5. Which planet has the comparative advantage in fried chicken?arrow_forwardKim and Abby are sisters who share a room. Their room can easily get messy, and their parents are always telling them to clean it up. Here are the costs and benefits to both Kim and Abby, of taking time to clean their room: If both Kim and Abby clean, they each spend two hours and get a clean room. If Kim decides not to clean and Abby does all the cleaning, then Abby spends 10 hours cleaning (Kim spends 0) but Abby is exhausted. The same would occur for Kim if Abby decided not to clean - Kim spends 10 hours and becomes exhausted. If both girls decide not to clean, they both have a dirty room. a. What is the best outcome for Kim and Abby? What is the worst outcome? (It may help you to construct a prisoner's dilemma table) b. Unfortunately, we know that the optimal outcome will most likely not happen, and that the worst outcome will probably be chosen instead. Explain what it is about Kim's and Abby's reasoning that will lead them both to choose the worst outcome.arrow_forwardBecause the two countries produce more jeans and more rye under specialization, each country is able to gain from trade. Calculate the gains from trade-that is, the amount by which each country has increased its consumption of each good relative to the first row of the table. In the following table, enter this difference in the boxes across the last row (marked "Increase in Consumption"). Contente Dolorium Jeans Rye Jeans Rye (Millions of pairs) (Millions of bushels) (Millions of pairs) (Millions of bushels) Without Trade Production 8. 48 15 20 Consumption 8. 48 15 20 With Trade Production 32 80 Trade action Exports 18 Imports 54 Imports 18 Exports 54 Consumption 14 54 18 26 Gains from Trade Increase in Consumptionarrow_forward
- ] Alex and Mitch are two farmers who grow vegetables on common land. Each farmer gets a benefit from the seeds that he plants, but the overall size and quality of the individual vegetables decreases as the number of seeds planted increases (since each vegetable has less room to grow and gets a smaller share of nutrients from the soil). If SA represents the total number of seeds planted by Alex and SM is the total number planted by Mitch, then the total benefit to Alex will be as follows: SA (90-SA-SM), or 90SA SA2-SASM. The marginal benefit to Alex from planting additional seeds is, therefore, equal to 90 - 2SA - SM- Assuming the marginal cost of planting is zero, the best-response function that gives the optimal number of seeds Alex should plant, as a function of the number of seeds Mitch chooses to plant, is represented by • Use the blue line (circle symbol) to plot Alex's best-response function (BRF) on the following graph, with the total number of seeds he plants on the vertical…arrow_forwardIf an economy is producing efficiently, then it is possible to produce more of both goods without increasing the quantities of inputs that are being used. it is possible to produce more of one good without producing less of another good. there is no way to produce more of one good without producing less of another good. it is not possible to produce more of any good at any cost. 0000arrow_forwardUncertain if what I have so far is correct and unsure how to solve the rest properlyarrow_forward
- what is the role of government in bringing about Pareto-efficiencyarrow_forwardThere are about 2500 leather wallets available in a country. When the price of these wallets is raised to $3000, economists believe that people may not be willing to buy them. On the other hand, if the price is decreased to $0, the 2500 leather wallets will be sold out. However, no producers will be willing to sell them at $0. If the price is set to $1000, producers will be willing to sell all 2500 leather wallets. Create the demand and supply equation for the leather wallets based on the given information.arrow_forwardMalaria Eradication Back on the Table In response to the Gates Malaria Forum in October 2007, countries are debating the pros and cons of eradication. Dr. Arata Kochi of the World Health Organization believes that with enough money malaria cases could be cut by 90 percent, but it would be very expensive to eliminate the remaining 10 percent of cases, so countries should not strive to eradicate malaria. Make a graph with the percentage of malaria cases eliminated on the x -axis and the marginal cost and marginal benefit of driving down malaria cases on the y -axis. On your graph: (i) Draw a marginal cost curve and marginal benefit curve that are consistent with Dr. Kochi’s opinion. (ii) Identify the quantity of malaria eradicated that achieves allocative efficiency.arrow_forward
- Alice and Bob each produce haircuts and landscaping services. Alice can provide 4 haircuts in one hour. Bob can provide 2 haircuts in one hour. It takes Alice 2 hours to landscape an acre of property. It takes Bob 1 hour to landscape an acre of property. Assume Alice and Bob both work a standard 8 hour day. Which of the following must be true? (check all that apply) Alice has the absolute advantage in haircuts. Bob has the absolute advantage in landscaping. Bob has the comparative advantage in landscaping. Alice has the comparative advantage in haircuts.arrow_forwardConsider two neighboring island countries called Arcadia and Dolorium. They each have 4 million labor hours available per week that they can use to produce jeans, corn, or a combination of both. The following table shows the amount of jeans or corn that can be produced using 1 hour of labor. Jeans Corn Country (Pairs per hour of labor) (Bushels per hour of labor) Arcadia 8. 16 Dolorium 20 Initially, suppose Arcadia uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce jeans and 3 million hours per week to produce corn, while Dolorium uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce jeans and 1 million hours per week to produce corn. Consequently, Arcadia produces 8 million pairs of jeans and 48 million bushels of corn, and Dolorium produces 15 million pairs of jeans and 20 million bushels of corn. Assume there are no other countries willing to trade goods, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of jeans and corn it produces. Arcadia's…arrow_forwardConsider two neighboring island countries called Dolorium and Contente. They each have 4 million labor hours available per week that they can use to produce rye, jeans, or a combination of both. The following table shows the amount of rye or jeans that can be produced using 1 hour of labor. Country Rye Jeans (Bushels per hour of labor) (Pairs per hour of labor) Dolorium 5 20 Contente 8 16 Initially, suppose Contente uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce rye and 3 million hours per week to produce jeans, while Dolorium uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce rye and 1 million hours per week to produce jeans. Consequently, Dolorium produces 15 million bushels of rye and 20 million pairs of jeans, and Contente produces 8 million bushels of rye and 48 million pairs of jeans. Assume there are no other countries willing to trade goods, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of rye and jeans…arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning