Subpart (a):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
In this given scenario, fisherman is the only variable factor. When other things remain the same increasing the number of fisherman leads to reduce the productivity which is known as diminishing marginal productivity.
In the fish firm, all the factors can be varied according to the requirement. Thus, marginal productivity is constant for the fisherman in the firm.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (b):
Number of fishing person.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Minimum number of fish should catch is 2 per day. The number of fisherman fishing in the lake can be calculated as follows.
Thus, the number of fisherman catching fish in the lake is 4. Remaining one fisherman is working in the firm. Total number of fish catching is 10 units
Subpart (c):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
Total number of fish can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the respective values in equation (1) to calculate the total number of fish at 1 unit of fisher man.
Total fish is 5 units.
Marginal productivity can be calculated as follows.
Substitute the respective values in equation (2) to calculate the marginal productivity of fish at 2 unit of fisher man.
Total fish is 5 units.
Table -1 shows the marginal productivity of fisher in the lake that obtained by using equation (1).
Table -1
Total fisherman (a) |
Catching fish per person
| Total fish | Marginal productivity |
1 | 5 | 5 | - |
2 | 4 | 8 | 3 |
3 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
4 | 2 | 8 | –1 |
5 | 1 | 5 | –3 |
Profit maximizing output is occurred at the point where the marginal revenue is equal to or greater than the marginal cost. Since marginal productivity is closer to 2 at the number of fisherman is 2, two fishers should be catch the fish in lake. Remaining 3 fishermen should work in the farm. And remaining 3 people should produce fish the farm. Total production of fish can be calculated as follows.
Thus, total number of fish is 14.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (d):
Marginal productivity and its relevance.
Subpart (d):
Explanation of Solution
The value of tax should be equal to the marginal productivity of the fisherman. The marginal productivity of fishermen is 2 (Fisherman produces fish in the farm). Thus, the tax should be equal to $2. The marginal productivity for fisher man who working in the lake is equal to or greater than the tax amount $2. Thus, two fisher man catching fish in lake and rest of the fisherman produces fish in the farm.
Concept introduction:
Marginal product: Marginal product refers to an additional product in the total product due to a change in one unit of labor.
Diminishing marginal product: Diminishing marginal productivity refers to the increase in output at a slower rate as an additional unit of input increases.
Subpart (e):
Number of fish per person
Subpart (e):
Explanation of Solution
Number of fish per person as per the policy can be calculated as follows.
Thus, one fisherman gets 2.8 units of fish.
The person work in the farm produces only 32 units of fish and now receives additional 0.8 units of fish. On the other hand, the fisherman who works in the lake catches 4 per person. Now they are losing 1.2 units of fish. The policy makers opinion is that if there is no restriction, then fisherman in the lake would catch only 2 units of fish per fisherman.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)
- Jefferson Franklin 1 wheat 1/2 cotton The table above shows the number of hours required to produce one bushel of cotton and one bushel of wheat for Jefferson and Franklin. If each person specializes according to his comparative advantage(s), a mutually beneficial price ratio would be = 1 wheat= 2/3 cotton 1 wheat = 0.4 cotton Cotton (per bushel) 10 hours 12 hours 1 wheat 1/3 cotton = Wheat (per bushel) 5 hours 4 hours raarrow_forwardConsider two neighboring island countries called Arcadia and Dolorium. They each have 4 million labor hours available per week that they can use to produce jeans, corn, or a combination of both. The following table shows the amount of jeans or corn that can be produced using 1 hour of labor. Jeans Corn Country (Pairs per hour of labor) (Bushels per hour of labor) Arcadia 8. 16 Dolorium 20 Initially, suppose Arcadia uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce jeans and 3 million hours per week to produce corn, while Dolorium uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce jeans and 1 million hours per week to produce corn. Consequently, Arcadia produces 8 million pairs of jeans and 48 million bushels of corn, and Dolorium produces 15 million pairs of jeans and 20 million bushels of corn. Assume there are no other countries willing to trade goods, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of jeans and corn it produces. Arcadia's…arrow_forwardAlec and Ellie are the only detectives in the town of Broadchurch. They work together. Assume efficient production. Each has 10 hours in a day to allocate between conducting interviews and completing paperwork. Alec takes 25 hours to complete one interview or 4 hours to complete one file of paperwork. Ellie takes 15 hours to complete one interview or 20 hours to complete one file of paperwork. What is Alec's Opportunity Cost of an interview in terms of files of paperwork? Enter a number only. Note: The question here is asking you for the opp. cost in terms of files so you can just enter a number. On the assessments if the question is phrased as "what is the opportunity cost?", you will have to enter the units as well, without which you will not get full credit.arrow_forward
- Consider two neighboring island countries called Dolorium and Contente. They each have 4 million labor hours available per week that they can use to produce rye, jeans, or a combination of both. The following table shows the amount of rye or jeans that can be produced using 1 hour of labor. Country Rye Jeans (Bushels per hour of labor) (Pairs per hour of labor) Dolorium 5 20 Contente 8 16 Initially, suppose Contente uses 1 million hours of labor per week to produce rye and 3 million hours per week to produce jeans, while Dolorium uses 3 million hours of labor per week to produce rye and 1 million hours per week to produce jeans. Consequently, Dolorium produces 15 million bushels of rye and 20 million pairs of jeans, and Contente produces 8 million bushels of rye and 48 million pairs of jeans. Assume there are no other countries willing to trade goods, so, in the absence of trade between these two countries, each country consumes the amount of rye and jeans…arrow_forwardA country (Country X) that only produces two goods (good A) and (good B) in a closed market with another country (Country Y) that only produces the same two goods. Country X has 1000 workers and Country Y has 4000 and no workers can migrate. It takes Country X 2 workers to produce good A and 3 workers to produce good B whereas it takes Country Y 3 workers to produce good A and 1 worker to produce good B. Labour is the only factor of production and both follow a standard Ricardian model that has an identical utility function. Country X decides to adopt an import substitution strategy to improve the efficiency of productivity of good B. Explain what this means and provide an opinion on this strategy?arrow_forwardWhen households plant trees in their front yards they reduce pollution and air conditioning costs for both themselves and their neighbors. Will households plant the efficient number of trees? Explain why or not and draw a graph to show your point. The graph should be clearly labeled.arrow_forward
- Suppose five people have houses on the same small lane. They all individually benefit from regular maintenance of the lane. Their individual marginal benefit curves are P = 8 ― (1/10)Q, where P reflects a willingness to pay in thousands and Q is the length of the road repaired in ten-yard units. The cost of maintenance is $2,000 per ten yards. Suppose one person is currently the only one paying for maintenance. How much does this person buy, and what is the deadweight loss? Does anyone individually have an incentive to pay for additional maintenance, and why or why not?arrow_forwardThe town of Grayling has 10 thousand residents who produce fish from fish farms and lakes. Each person who works on a fish farm produces 2 fish per day. Each person who fishes in a lake produces 10-X fish per day where X is the number of people (in thousands) who fish in the lakes. If the town issues tradable permits for lake fishing equal to the Pareto efficient value for X, what would a resident pay for one of these permits? (hint: how many extra fish does a lake fisherman catch compared to a fish farmer at the efficient value of X?)arrow_forward3 ranchers use a grassland to feed their cows. The ranchers must choose how many cows - 0-106² per cow, where G is 3 to raise. The benefit of raising a cow for a rancher is 100 – the total quantity of cows using the grassland. The marginal cost of raising a cow is 10. Hence, the net benefit of raising cows for any rancher is (100-1G²) g – 10g, where 3 g is the quantity of cows raised by the rancher. What is the total quantity of cows using the grassland, implied by the Nash Equilibrium? जोळ जोप √5 12arrow_forward
- Hand written solutions are strictly prohibitedarrow_forwardPA no Page 5 8. Pat and Kerry are considering a partnership. With all Pat's resources, Pat can produce 50 X or 20 Y. With all of Kerry's resources, Kerry can produce 30 X or 30 Y. Assume the resources can be easily substituted to make either product. They are starting by using half of the resources to make each item. These relationships are shown in the following table. Use this information to answer the following questions: Kerry Product X (Xylophones) Product Y (Yams) 50 0 Pat 25 Pat make? 10 0 20 Pat make? 30 0 15 15 0 30 a. Who has an absolute advantage in producing X? Pat b. Who is a comparative advantage in producing Y? Partnership be gained from before they started trading? c. If Pat and Kerry decided to take all the gains from trade in X, how much X would 40 25 d. If Pat and Kerry decided to take all the gains from trade in X, how much X would Gain be gained from before they started trading? e. If Pat and Kerry decided to take all the gains from trade in Y, how much Y would f.…arrow_forwardThere is increasing scientific evidence that climate change caused by human actions has substantially impacted surface temperatures on Earth. However, what is unclear is the tools available to managers and policymakers to reduce carbon emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions come from a large number of sources such as power plants, and factories to automobiles all around the world. Therefore, the number of pollution sources that need to be controlled is enormous. Additionally, countries often balk at the enormous price of curtailing their emissions. To address some of these challenges, the European Union adopted a cap-and-trade system to reduce their emissions. As an economic advisor and consultant to the European Union, your opinion has been sought on the cap-and-trade system and whether it is beneficial in reducing carbon emissions. Using the tools of managerial economics, analyse the cap-and trade system and comment on the ability of this policy to reduce carbon emissions. Does a…arrow_forward
- Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506893Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning