Videos
a.
The
Explanation: The net present value of alternative 1 is -$5,921.3.
Explanation:
Calculate the net present value as shown below.
| Particulars | Cash flow | Present value at 10% | Present value of net cash flow |
| Year 1 |
$8,000 |
0.9091 |
$7,272.8 |
| Year 2 |
$8,000 |
0.8264 |
$6,611.2 |
| Year 3 |
$8,000 |
0.7513 |
$6,010.4 |
| Year 4 |
$8,000 |
0.6830 |
$5,464.0 |
| Year 5 |
$8,000 |
0.6209 |
$4,967.2 |
| Year 6 |
$8,000 |
0.5645 |
$4,516.0 |
| Year 7 |
$8,000 |
0.5132 |
$4,105.6 |
| Year 8 |
$11,000 |
0.4665 |
$5,131.5 |
| Total |
$44,078.7 | ||
| Invested outflows |
$67,000 |
($50,000.0) | |
| Net present value |
-$5,921.3 | ||
Table – 1
Therefore, the net present value of alternative 1 is -$5,921.3.
Working Notes:
(a) On deduction of yearly operating cost from yearly revenues, the yearly cash flow is obtained.
(b) The
(c) The cost of old machine is not considered as the invested amount, as such cost is historical cost.
Conclusion:
Since the total cash flows are smaller than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
b.
The net present value of alternative 2.
Explanation: The net present value of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Explanation:
Calculate the net present value as shown below.
| Particulars | Cash flow | Present value at 10% | Present value of net cash flow |
| Year 1 | $38,000 | 0.9091 | $34,545.8 |
| Year 2 | $38,000 | 0.8264 | $31,403.2 |
| Year 3 | $38,000 | 0.7513 | $28,549.4 |
| Year 4 | $38,000 | 0.6830 | $25,954.0 |
| Year 5 | $38,000 | 0.6209 | $23,594.2 |
| Year 6 | $38,000 | 0.5645 | $21,451.0 |
| Year 7 | $38,000 | 0.5132 | $19,501.6 |
| Year 8 | $46,000 | 0.4665 | $21,459.0 |
| Total cash flows | $206,458.2 | ||
| Invested outflows | $312,000 | ($145,000.0) | |
| Net present value | $61,458.2 | ||
Table – 2
Therefore, the net present value of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Working Notes:
(a) On deduction of yearly operating cost from yearly revenues, the yearly cash flow is obtained.
(b) The cash inflow of $46,000 is obtained by adding the salvage value of $8,000 is added in the actual cash inflow of the eighth year.
(c) The cost of old machine is not considered as the invested amount, as such cost is historical cost.
Conclusion:
Since the total cash flows are greater than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
c.
To ascertain: The alternative to be recommended to management.
Explanation: Alternative 2 should be selected.
Explanation:
The projects or alternatives with positive NPV should be accepted, as the total cash flows are greater than the invested amount. The net present value of the alternative 1 is -$5,921.3 and that of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Hence, alternative 1 shows the negative net present value and alternative 2 shows positive net present value.
Conclusion:
Hence, alternative 2 should be recommended to the management.
a.
Explanation of Solution
The net present value of alternative 1 is -$5,921.3.
Since the total cash flows are smaller than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
b.
The net present value of alternative 2.
b.
Explanation of Solution
The net present value of alternative 2 is $61,458.2.
Since the total cash flows are greater than the invested amount, the net present value is negative.
c.
To ascertain: The alternative to be recommended to management.
c.
Explanation of Solution
Alternative 2 should be selected.
Hence, alternative 2 should be recommended to the management.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Managerial Accounting
- The industrial enterprise "HUANG S.A." purchased a sorting and packaging machine from a foreign company on 1/4/2017 at a cost of €500,000. The useful life of the machine was estimated by the Management at ten (10) years, while the residual value was estimated at zero. For the transportation of the machine from abroad to the company's factory, the amount of €20,000 was paid on 15/4/2017. As the insurance coverage of the machine during transportation was the responsibility of the selling company, HUANG S.A. proceeded to insure the machine from 16/4/2017 to 15/4/2018, paying the amount of €1,200. The delivery took place on 15/4/2017. As adequate ventilation of the multifunction device is essential for its proper operation, the company fitted an air duct on the multifunction device. The cost of the air duct amounted to €2,000 and was paid on 20/4/2017. On 25/4/2017, an external electrician was paid €5,000 for the electrical connection of the device. The company also paid €5,000 to an…arrow_forwardI need answer typing clear urjent no chatgpt used pls i will give 5 Upvotes.only typing .arrow_forwardCash flow cyclearrow_forward
AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSON
Intermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education