Concept explainers
Explain the reason for the study to be an observational study.
Check whether it is possible to conclude that steroids caused an increase in homeruns.

Answer to Problem 1E
The given study is a retrospective observational study.
No, it is not possible to conclude that the steroids caused an increase in homeruns.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
A researcher’s wish is to examine the effect of steroids in major league baseball; in general, it is known that most of the players take steroids to increase the performance in the field. For this, the sports writer compares the homeruns and steroids intake from the 1960’s.
Justification:
Observational study:
An observational study measures the values of a variable without influencing the values of response variables and explanatory variables. Thus, in an observational study, researchers can observe the behaviors of the individuals without influencing the outcome of that study.
Here, the researcher ask the individual players whether they take steroids or not and observes their homerun totals. The researchers do not influence the individuals to take steroids but merely observe.
Hence, this is an observational study.
Here, there is a relationship between steroids and homerun totals.
Causation:
If one
Even though there is an association between the variables “steroids” and “homerun totals”, the association between the two variables does not infer that the change in one variable is the cause of the change in other variables.
Moreover, the most important thing is that
Lurking variable:
The lurking variable is a type of extraneous variable which is not accounted for under the study. However, it may affect response variables or explanatory variables.
There is a chance for the variables “steroids” and “homerun totals” to not have direct association. The association exists through the lurking variable.
In general case, there is a possibility for the existence of a lurking variable which will be associated with both the variables “steroids” and “homerun totals”.
Therefore, the steroids do not cause homeruns.
Thus, there is no causation between the variables “steroids” and “homerun totals”.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Stats
- help me with abc please. please handwrite if possible. please don't use AI tools to answerarrow_forwardhelp me with abc please. please handwrite if possible. please don't use AI tools to answerarrow_forwardhelp me with abc please. please handwrite if possible. please don't use AI tools to answer.arrow_forward
- Please help me with this statistics questionarrow_forwardPlease help me with the following statistic questionarrow_forwardTo evaluate the success of a 1-year experimental program designed to increase the mathematical achievement of underprivileged high school seniors, a random sample of participants in the program will be selected and their mathematics scores will be compared with the previous year’s statewide average of 525 for underprivileged seniors. The researchers want to determine whether the experimental program has increased the mean achievement level over the previous year’s statewide average. If alpha=.05, what sample size is needed to have a probability of Type II error of at most .025 if the actual mean is increased to 550? From previous results, sigma=80.arrow_forward
- Please help me answer the following questions from this problem.arrow_forwardPlease help me find the sample variance for this question.arrow_forwardCrumbs Cookies was interested in seeing if there was an association between cookie flavor and whether or not there was frosting. Given are the results of the last week's orders. Frosting No Frosting Total Sugar Cookie 50 Red Velvet 66 136 Chocolate Chip 58 Total 220 400 Which category has the greatest joint frequency? Chocolate chip cookies with frosting Sugar cookies with no frosting Chocolate chip cookies Cookies with frostingarrow_forward
- The table given shows the length, in feet, of dolphins at an aquarium. 7 15 10 18 18 15 9 22 Are there any outliers in the data? There is an outlier at 22 feet. There is an outlier at 7 feet. There are outliers at 7 and 22 feet. There are no outliers.arrow_forwardStart by summarizing the key events in a clear and persuasive manner on the article Endrikat, J., Guenther, T. W., & Titus, R. (2020). Consequences of Strategic Performance Measurement Systems: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Management Accounting Research?arrow_forwardThe table below was compiled for a middle school from the 2003 English/Language Arts PACT exam. Grade 6 7 8 Below Basic 60 62 76 Basic 87 134 140 Proficient 87 102 100 Advanced 42 24 21 Partition the likelihood ratio test statistic into 6 independent 1 df components. What conclusions can you draw from these components?arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman





