
Concept explainers
The equilibrium point and reason for the great depression lasting for a long time.

Explanation of Solution
According to Keynesian view, the equilibrium output is determined at the point where the aggregate planned expenditure is equal to the current output level. In addition, the equilibrium level of output is determined at less than full employment level of output.
During the great depression of 1930s, there was wage rigidity due to the union. Particularly, the wage rigidity was in terms of reducing wage. When the aggregate expenditure decreases, it leads to reduction in the sales and increase in the inventory. Since inventory increases, firms reduce output. The reducing output causes decrease in employment and income. When income decreases, reducing
The decrease in aggregate expenditure reduces the aggregate demand. This in turn increases the inventory. Since actual inventory level is greater than equilibrium level, the firm reduces the output and does not increase the output even though the interest rate decreases.
Thus, the depression lasted for a long time period due to the wage rigidity and lower aggregate demand even when the rate of interest or price of the good had reduced.
Aggregate expenditure: The aggregate spending or expenditure is the total spending on goods and services in an economy at a given time period. There are four components of the aggregate expenditure: consumption (C), planned investment (I), and government purchases (G), and net exports (NX).
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
- Consider the following statements: a. Fewer people are employed in Freedonia now than at any time in the past 75 years. b. The unemployment rate in Freedonia is lower now than it has been in 75 years.Can both of these statements be true at the same time? A. Yes, these statements can be correct if more people are classified as "discouraged workers."B. No, these statements cannot be true since unemployment must increase as employment decreases.C. Yes, if the number of unemployed decreases more than the number of employed.D. Yes, both of these statements can be correct if labor productivity increases.arrow_forwardAsap please and quality answerarrow_forwardEverything is in the attached picture. 13arrow_forward
- Everything is in the attached picture. 22arrow_forwardEverything is in attached picture. 23arrow_forward1) Use the supply and demand schedules to graph the supply and demand functions. Find and show on the graph the equilibrium price and quantity, label it (A). P Q demanded P Q supplied 0 75 0 0 5 65 5 0 10 55 10 0 15 45 15 10 20 35 20 20 25 25 25 30 30 15 30 40 35 40 5 0 35 40 50 60 2) Find graphically and numerically the consumers and producers' surplus 3) The government introduced a tax of 10$, Label the price buyers pay and suppliers receive. Label the new equilibrium for buyers (B) and Sellers (S). How the surpluses have changed? Give the numerical answer and show on the graph. 4) Calculate using midpoint method the elasticity of demand curve from point (A) to (B) and elasticity of the supply curve from point (A) to (C).arrow_forward
- Four heirs (A, B, C, and D) must divide fairly an estate consisting of three items — a house, a cabin and a boat — using the method of sealed bids. The players' bids (in dollars) are: In the initial allocation, player D Group of answer choices gets no items and gets $62,500 from the estate. gets the house and pays the estate $122,500. gets the cabin and gets $7,500 from the estate. gets the boat and and gets $55,500 from the estate. none of thesearrow_forwardJack and Jill are getting a divorce. Except for the house, they own very little of value so they agree to divide the house fairly using the method of sealed bids. Jack bids 140,000 and Jill bids 160,000. After all is said and done, the final outcome is Group of answer choices Jill gets the house and pays Jack $80,000. Jill gets the house and pays Jack $75,000. Jill gets the house and pays Jack $70,000. Jill gets the house and pays Jack $65,000. none of thesearrow_forwardThe problem statement never defines whether the loan had compound or simple interest. The readings indicate that the diference in those will be learned later, and the formula used fro this answer was not in the chapter. Should it be assumbed that a simple interest caluclaton should be used?arrow_forward
- Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Macroeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781285165912Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning





