ECON MACRO (with ECON MACRO Online, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card) (New, Engaging Titles from 4LTR Press)
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781305659094
Author: William A. McEachern
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
thumb_up100%
Chapter 11, Problem 1.7P
To determine
The impact of tax cut on the recessionary gap.
Concept Introduction:
Fiscal Policy: Fiscal policy is the policy by which government regulates the nation’s economy by adjusting the government spending and controlling the tax rates. It tries to influence the
Recessionary Gap: Recessionary Gap is the gap between actual output and potential output under full employment situation when actual output is less than potential output.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Suppose the economy begins at full employment. Label this starting point as point "1."
Then, suppose that a long strike by coal miners reduces the coal supply and increases the price of coal. Show the effects on your graph and label the new equilibrium point "2."
Lastly, suppose our government wants the economy to return to full-employment as quickly as possible. Should the government intervene? If so, show the impact of successful fiscal policy on your graph. Label this new equilibrium point "3."
The country is experiencing a serious rise in inflation which the government wants to control through fiscal policy. The Government will decrease spending by $20 million and increase taxes by $15 million. The marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.80. What will be the effect on GDP and by how much?
A recessionary gap is how much GDP needs to increase from the current GDP to achieve full employment. Let's say that we are experiencing a recessionary gap of $36 million. Also assume that the MPC equals .80. The government decides to decrease taxes to close the recessionary gap. How much will be the tax decrease?
An inflationary gap is how much GDP needs to decrease from the current GDP to maintain employment while avoiding inflation. Let's say that we are experiencing an inflationary gap of $200 million. The government decides to increase taxes. Assume the MPC equals .80. How much will the tax increase be?
The government wants to achieve a balanced budget. It therefore increases…
Should the government fight recessions with spending hikes rather than tax cuts ? Explain.
Chapter 11 Solutions
ECON MACRO (with ECON MACRO Online, 1 term (6 months) Printed Access Card) (New, Engaging Titles from 4LTR Press)
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Compare two fiscal policies: a tax cut on income or an increase in government spending on roads and bridges. What are both the short-term and long-term impacts of such policies on the economy?arrow_forwardGiven the b=mpc=.8, and Yf-Ye=400, how much government spending is necessary to close the recessionary gap, and how much tax cut is necessary to get to full employment?arrow_forwardWhat is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government increases its purchases of goods and services by $75,000? Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75. $ What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government, instead of changing its spending, increases transfers by $75,000? Assume the MPC has not changed. $ An increase in government transfers or taxes, as opposed to an increase in government purchases of goods and services, will result in an identical eventual effect on real GDP. no change to real GDP. a larger eventual effect on real GDP. a smaller eventual effect on real GDP.arrow_forward
- Macmillan Learning What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government increases its purchases of goods and services by $60,000? Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is 0.75. What is the eventual effect on real GDP if the government, instead of changing its spending, increases transfers by $60,000? Assume the MPC has not changed. An increase in government transfers or taxes, as opposed to an increase in government purchases of goods and services, will result in O no change to real GDP. O a smaller eventual effect on real GDP. a larger eventual effect on real GDP. O an identical eventual effect on real GDP.arrow_forwardPresident Biden is proposing an increase in the corporate income tax rate from 21% to 28%. Although the corporate tax rate will be higher than it is currently, it is still lower than the corporate tax rate of 35% that had been in place since President Clinton. How will this tax increase affect aggregate expenditures, equilibrium GDP and employment? Part of the reason for this proposal is to offset the increased spending from the last three stimulus packages/checks which increased Federal government's debt. Do you agree with the proposed increase in corporate tax rates? Why or why not? What are some of the costs and benefits of the proposed tax changes? Is this the right time to increase taxes? Why or why not?arrow_forwarda). A recessionary gap is how much GDP needs to increase from the current GDP to achieve full employment. Let us say that we are experiencing a recessionary gap of $36 million. Also assume that the MPC equals .80. The government decides to decrease taxes in order to close the recessionary gap. What will be the tax decrease? b). An inflationary gap is how much GDP needs to decrease from the current GDP to maintain employment while avoiding inflation. Let us say that we are experiencing an inflationary gap of $200 million. The government decides to increase taxes. Assume that the MPC equals .80. What will be the tax increase?arrow_forward
- The graph below depicts an economy where a decline in aggregate demand has caused a recession. Assume the government decides to conduct fiscal policy by changing taxes to reduce the burden of this recession. Fiscal Policy Price Level 150 LRAS AS 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 AD1 AD 0 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640 720 800 Real GDP (billions of dollars) Instructions: Enter your answer as a whole number. If you are entering a negative number Include a minus sign. a. How much does aggregate demand need to change to restore the economy to its long-run equilibrium? $ billion b. If the MPC is 0.5, how much do taxes need to change to shift aggregate demand by the amount you found in part a? billion Suppose Instead that the MPC is 0.6. c. How much does aggregate demand and taxes need to change to restore the economy to its long-run equilibrium? Aggregate demand needs to change by $[ billion and taxes need to change by $[ billion.arrow_forward1.4. The deflationary gap in an economy is calculated to be $700 billion. The marginal propensity to save (MPS) is 0.1 The marginal propensity to import is (MPM) 0.15 The marginal rate of taxation is (MPT) 0.1. By how much would the government need change its spending on goods and services to eliminate the deflationary gap? 1.5. How does CHANGE in PRICES effect your lives? 1.6. Explain why INFLATION usually accelerates during wartime? Macroeconomics and the goals of Macroeconomic policyarrow_forwardWhich of the following is not a valid point in debating the merits of increasing government expenditures or cutting taxes during a recession? a. A cut in the marginal tax rate increases the incentives to find a job and work longer hours. b. Consumers will save a portion of a tax cut. c. The government may use the increase in expenditures on projects with little value, particularly, if it wishes to respond quickly. d. There is no evidence that tax cuts have been followed by increases in economic growth.arrow_forward
- The government is considering raising the tax rate on labor income. Explain the supply-side effects of such an action and use appropriate graphs to show the directions of change, not exact magnitudes. What will happen to: The supply of labor and why? The demand for labor and why? Equilibrium employment and why? The equilibrium before-tax wage rate and why? The equilibrium after-tax wage rate and why? Potential GDP? Explain your response with specifics and provide examples.arrow_forwardThe following graph shows the total expenditure line (TE) for an economy where current equilibrium output is $350 billion and potential output is $600 billion. The economy is experiencing _________ (a contractionary gap, an inflationary gap) equal to $______ billion. To close the output gap, government purchases could _______ (increase, decrease) by _____ ($50, 150, 75) billion. Thus, the value of the multiplier for this economy is ___________ (0.7143, 0.5833, 0.4167, 1.6667, 0.6).arrow_forwardSuppose actual real GDP is $7.91 trillion, potential real GDP is $13.33 trillion, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.68, and that the government has a balanced budget. If we ignore price effects, by how many trillions of dollars should the government change its spending to fix the gap while keeping the federal budget balanced? (Round this to two digits after the decimal and enter this value as either a positive value or a negative value without the dollar sign.)arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning