Concept Introduction:
The formula to calculate change in GDP is,
Here,
is autonomous spending. - MPC is marginal propensity to consume.
Marginal Propensity to Consume ( MPC ): It is defined as the change which occurs in total consumption level due to change in disposable income.
The formula to calculate MPC is,
Here,
is change in disposable income. 
is change in consumption level. - MPC is marginal propensity to consume.
Multiplier: It is defined as the ratio of total change in gross domestic product due to change in the autonomous spending.
The formula to calculate multiplier is,
Here,
- MPC is marginal propensity to consume.
Consumption Level ( C ): It is one of the largest components of GDP .The individual consumption Depends on the disposable income.
Consumption Function: It shows how the change in disposable income of an individual changes the consumption level.
The formula to calculate consumption function is,
Here,
- C is consumption level.
is autonomous consumption.
is disposable income- MPC is marginal propensity to consume.
Autonomous Consumption: This is defined as the consumption level when the income of an individual is zero.
Planned Aggregate Spending: It is the summation of consumption level in an economy and the planned investment.
The formula to calculate planned aggregate spending is,
Here,
- C is consumption level.
is the planned investment spending. 
is the planned aggregate spending.
Unplanned Investment: All those investments that businesses do not intend to take in given time. It is certain due to some external factors like fall in interest rate and increase in future profitability.
The formula to calculate unplanned investment is,
Here,
- YDis disposable income.
is unplanned investment spending. - AE is the planned aggregate spending.
Answer to Problem 13P
a. Planned aggregate expenditure and unplanned investment.
| GDP | YD (A) | C (B) | Iplanned (C ) | AEplanned  | Iunplanned  |
| (billions of dollars) | |||||
| 0 | 0 | 100 | 300 | 400 |  |
| 400 | 400 | 400 | 300 | 700 |  |
| 800 | 800 | 700 | 300 | 1,000 |  |
| 1,200 | 1,200 | 1,000 | 300 | 1,300 |  |
| 1,600 | 1,600 | 1,300 | 300 | 1,600 | 0 |
| 2,000 | 2,000 | 1,600 | 300 | 1,900 | 100 |
| 2,400 | 2,400 | 1,900 | 300 | 2,200 | 200 |
| 2,800 | 2,800 | 2,200 | 300 | 2,500 | 300 |
| 3,200 | 3,200 | 2,500 | 300 | 2,800 | 400 |
b. Aggregate consumption function.
Given,
Autonomous consumption is $100 billion.
Change in disposable income is $400 billion.
Change in aggregate consumer spending is $300 billion.
The formula to calculate MPC is,
Substitute $300 billion for 
and $400 billion for
Hence MPC is 0.75.
The formula to calculate consumption function is,
Substitute $100 billion for 
and 0.75 for MPC.
c. Income- expenditure equilibrium GDP.
The equilibrium GDP (Y*) is $1,600 billion.
Explanation of Solution
Income expenditure equilibrium GDP is the point where planned aggregate spending is equal to the GDP. The table drawn in part a highlights the condition is satisfied at the level where GDP is equal to $1,600 billion.
d. Value of the multiplier.
Given,
MPC is 0.75.
The formula to calculate multiplier is,
Substitute 0.75 for MPC.
e. The new Y * when planned investment changes.
Given,
New investment is $200 billion.
Initial investment is $300 billion.
The formula to calculate change in planned investment is,
Substitute $200 billion for new investment and $200 billion for initial investment.
Given,
Change in investment is 
billion.
Real GDP is $1,600 billion.
Multiplier is 4.
The formula to calculate new Y* is,
Substitute $1,600 billion for real GDP, 4 for multiplier and 
billion for change in investment.
f. The new Y * when autonomous consumption changes.
Given,
New autonomous consumption is $200 billion.
Initial autonomous consumption is $100 billion.
The formula to calculate change in autonomous consumption is,
Substitute $200 billion for new consumption and $100 billion for initial consumption.
Given,
Change in consumption is $100 billion.
Real GDP is $1,600 billion.
Multiplier is 4.
The formula to calculate new Y* is,
Substitute $1,600 billion for real GDP, 4 for multiplier and $100 billion for change in consumption.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
LaunchPad for Krugman's Macroeconomics (Six Month Access)
- Suppose the nominal exchange rate is 5 Flops per Gulp. A Guilderian trader buys a 40 Flop barrel of Florish pickles by exchanging 8 Gulps, and a Florish trader buys a 10 Gulp crate of Guilderian apples by exchanging 50 Flops. Then the Gulp appreciates to 10 Flops per Gulp. What price must the Guilderian pay for the same 40 Flop barrel of pickles? Gulps How much must the Florish trader pay for the same 10 Gulp crate of apples? Flopsarrow_forwardSuppose the nominal exchange rate is 0.25 Flops per Gulp. A Guilderian trader wants to buy a barrel of Florish turnips for 20 Flops. How many Gulps must he convert to get that many Flops?arrow_forward3. With 17,508 islands, 700 languages, 58 active volcanoes, Indonesia is a dream place. Your company, located in the United States, specializes in importing electrical equipment from Indonesia. In 2023, the United States imported a total of $4.63 billion of electrical and electronic equipment from Indonesia. As of 2024, the average currency exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and Indonesian Rupiah is 1 U.S. dollar to 15,458 Rupiah. However, the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Rupiah has been declining for the past 3 months. Basically, the U.S. dollar continues to depreciate against the Rupiah. While chilling in your living room with your friends and watching the evening news, you hear a reporter state the following: "Due to stubborn high inflation in the United States, the central bank decided to raise the interest rate to control the growth of inflation." The next day, you shared that news with your team at work, and one of teammates seemed confused because she did…arrow_forward
- 1. 1800 tons of pomegranates a year is a lot of sweetness! Summertime is approaching, and you decide to spend your summer vacation with your Aunt Zahra who lives in Jalalabad. Jalalabad is one of the major cities in Afghanistan and is known for its rich cultural heritage. It also has economic importance and is especially well-known for its luscious fruits, such as pomegranates, grapes, and mulberries, and also for its beautiful mountains. Your plan is to travel around while there visiting national parks and local villages and to purchase locally made gifts for your family and friends who live in the United States. Part of your trip plan is to figure out how much money you will need to bring with you to Afghanistan. You learned that the exchange rate is 71 Afghan Afghani for 1 US dollar. Now, you are one month away from your departure time to Jalalabad, and as you were surfing the net to learn about the country and to learn a few greeting words in Afghani, you came across a recent…arrow_forwardAn economy originally operates at the full employment output level. Suppose the economy suddenly experiences a rapid growth in aggregate demand. a. With the aid of an AS-AD diagram, explain why there will be inflationary pressure in the short run. b. suppose the government does not intervene. Using the same diagram in part (a) and with reference to the market adjustment mechanism from the short run to the long run, explain whether the inflationary pressure can be relieved in the long run. C. With the aid of another diagram, suggest ONE fiscal policy that can deal with the inflation. Suggest THREE methods that the government can use to promote economic growth in the long run.arrow_forwardThe table below shows pizza topping preferences for Marcus, Dakota, and Austin, and that each individual has strictly transitive preferences. Suppose that three individuals make up our "society." In this society, prefer pepperoni to cheese pizza; _prefer cheese to supreme; and prefer supreme to pepperoni. This example illustrates that _ Person Marcus Dakota Austin 0000 First Preference Pepperoni Supreme Cheese Second Preference Cheese Pepperoni Supreme Third Preference Supreme Cheese Pepperoni two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences must also. two-thirds; two-thirds; everyone; even if individuals' preferences might satisfy the transitive property, societal preferences may not. two-thirds; two-thirds; two-thirds; if individuals' preferences satisfy the transitive property,…arrow_forward
- Consider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. In 2020, every professor was offered a full insurance contract with no premium. In 2021, HU charged any employee who wanted to keep health insurance the actuarially fair premium based on 2020 expenditures. This premium would be equal to and, as a result,professors dropped their coverage in 2021. _ 2020 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes Yes $25,000 $15,000 000000 $15,000; criminology $25,000; econ $20,000; econ $15,000; econ $20,000; criminology $25,000; criminology ??? $28,000 ??? $10,000arrow_forwardConsider the table below, which has data on insurance status and medical expenditures for different types of professors at Hypothetical University (HU), economics & criminology professors. Assume that there are an equal number of economics and criminology professors. Assume further that econ professors all have the same level of health and criminology professors all have the same level of health. There is evidence of 2021 Insured? Avg. Expenditures Insured? Avg. Expenditures 2020 Economics Professors Criminology Professors Yes. Yes $25,000 $15,000 0000 ??? ??? $28,000 $10,000 I. moral hazard because in 2021 criminology professors dropped their coverage and health expenditures went down. II. adverse selection because in response to rising premiums after 2020, the professors with lower health expenditure dropped coverage Both I and II neither I nor IIarrow_forward0000 Health Suppose that you graph nations' health expenditures against income and see that the US's point lies below others (like in the stylized figure below). From the graph below, it appears that the US is However, this may not be the case if_ Switzerland UK US HPF Health expenditures productively inefficient; The US has a population that prefers spending their resources on health productively efficient; The US has a population that prefers spending their resources on health productively efficient; The US has lower levels of inherent health, therefore it has its own HPF which is lower than the others. productively inefficient; The US has lower levels of inherent health, therefore it has its own HPF which is lower than the others.arrow_forward
- Please match the definition to the term that best fits. This occurs when less-risky people are more likely to enroll in health insurance. How much spent out-of-pocket before insurance kicks-in. When no more units of a good can be produced without decreasing the amount of another good or service The amount that the insurance company pays the customer when an insured event occurs. When an individuals income is state independent Behavior changes that occur before an insured event happens and make that event more likely to occur. The fraction of the medical bill that the consumer is responsible for. The fixed amount that is paid for a service at the time service is rendered. This occurs when marginal benefit of a good to a consumer is equal to marginal cost of production Behavior changes that occur after an insured event happens and make recovering from that event more expensive. Monthly fee to enroll in insurance The oversupply of low-quality goods, products, or contracts that results…arrow_forwardfor the 2nd part the last option got cut off, there is also a none of the above choice tooarrow_forwardMCB MCA The figure to the right shows the marginal cost of pollution abatement for two firms, A and B. The firms were initially abating 36 units of pollution each. Now they can trade pollution permits at a price of $32. As a result, firm permits and firm B A permits. Both firms are now better off and their total saving will be (Enter your answer rounded to the nearest $ whole number.) Dollars per Unit ($) 44 32 20 The Efficiency of Tradable Pollution Permits 31 36 41 Quantity of Pollution Abatement k -6°C Mostly clear Nextarrow_forward
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education