Depreciation methods; change in methods • LO11–2, LO11–6 The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2018 year-end financial statements for Company B: Income Statement Depreciation expense $ 10,000 Balance Sheet Assets: Plant and equipment, at cost $200,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (40,000) Net $160,000 You also determine that all of the assets constituting the plant and equipment of Company B were acquired at the same time, and that all of the $200,000 represents depreciable assets. Also, all of the depreciable assets have the same useful life and residual values are zero. Required: 1. In order to compare performance with Company A, estimate what B’s depreciation expense would have been for 2018 if the double-declining-balance depreciation method had been used by Company B since acquisition of the depreciable assets. 2. If Company B decided to switch depreciation methods in 2018 from the straight line to the double-declining-balance method, prepare the 2018 journal entry to record depreciation for the year, assuming no journal entry for depreciation in 2018 has yet been recorded.
Depreciation methods; change in methods • LO11–2, LO11–6 The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm. Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2018 year-end financial statements for Company B: Income Statement Depreciation expense $ 10,000 Balance Sheet Assets: Plant and equipment, at cost $200,000 Less: Accumulated depreciation (40,000) Net $160,000 You also determine that all of the assets constituting the plant and equipment of Company B were acquired at the same time, and that all of the $200,000 represents depreciable assets. Also, all of the depreciable assets have the same useful life and residual values are zero. Required: 1. In order to compare performance with Company A, estimate what B’s depreciation expense would have been for 2018 if the double-declining-balance depreciation method had been used by Company B since acquisition of the depreciable assets. 2. If Company B decided to switch depreciation methods in 2018 from the straight line to the double-declining-balance method, prepare the 2018 journal entry to record depreciation for the year, assuming no journal entry for depreciation in 2018 has yet been recorded.
Solution Summary: The author calculates the depreciation expense of Company B for the year 2018 using the double-declining-balance method.
The fact that generally accepted accounting principles allow companies flexibility in choosing between certain allocation methods can make it difficult for a financial analyst to compare periodic performance from firm to firm.
Suppose you were a financial analyst trying to compare the performance of two companies. Company A uses the double-declining-balance depreciation method. Company B uses the straight-line method. You have the following information taken from the 12/31/2018 year-end financial statements for Company B:
Income Statement
Depreciation expense
$ 10,000
Balance Sheet
Assets:
Plant and equipment, at cost
$200,000
Less: Accumulated depreciation
(40,000)
Net
$160,000
You also determine that all of the assets constituting the plant and equipment of Company B were acquired at the same time, and that all of the $200,000 represents depreciable assets. Also, all of the depreciable assets have the same useful life and residual values are zero.
Required:
1. In order to compare performance with Company A, estimate what B’s depreciation expense would have been for 2018 if the double-declining-balance depreciation method had been used by Company B since acquisition of the depreciable assets.
2. If Company B decided to switch depreciation methods in 2018 from the straight line to the double-declining-balance method, prepare the 2018 journal entry to record depreciation for the year, assuming no journal entry for depreciation in 2018 has yet been recorded.
Cullumber Company uses a job order cost system and applies overhead to production on the basis of direct labor costs. On January 1,
2025, Job 50 was the only job in process. The costs incurred prior to January 1 on this job were as follows: direct materials $16,800,
direct labor $10,080, and manufacturing overhead $13,440. As of January 1, Job 49 had been completed at a cost of $75,600 and was
part of finished goods inventory. There was a $12,600 balance in the Raw Materials Inventory account on January 1.
During the month of January, Cullumber Company began production on Jobs 51 and 52, and completed Jobs 50 and 51. Jobs 49 and
50 were sold on account during the month for $102,480 and $132,720, respectively. The following additional events occurred during
the month.
1.
Purchased additional raw materials of $75,600 on account.
2.
Incurred factory labor costs of $58,800.
3.
Incurred manufacturing overhead costs as follows: depreciation expense on equipment $10,080; and various other…
Cullumber Company uses a job order cost system and applies overhead to production on the basis of direct labor costs. On January 1,
2025, Job 50 was the only job in process. The costs incurred prior to January 1 on this job were as follows: direct materials $16,800,
direct labor $10,080, and manufacturing overhead $13,440. As of January 1, Job 49 had been completed at a cost of $75,600 and was
part of finished goods inventory. There was a $12,600 balance in the Raw Materials Inventory account on January 1.
During the month of January, Cullumber Company began production on Jobs 51 and 52, and completed Jobs 50 and 51. Jobs 49 and
50 were sold on account during the month for $102,480 and $132,720, respectively. The following additional events occurred during
the month.
1.
Purchased additional raw materials of $75,600 on account.
2.
Incurred factory labor costs of $58,800.
3.
Incurred manufacturing overhead costs as follows: depreciation expense on equipment $10,080; and various other…
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.