(a):
Calculate the
(a):
Explanation of Solution
Type 1: Debt (D) is 20%. Equity (E) is 80%. Cost of equity capital (CI) is 7.5%. Cost of debt capital (DI) is 10%.
Type 2: Debt (D) is 50%. Equity (E) is 50%. Cost of equity capital (CI) is 7.5%. Cost of debt capital (DI) is 10%.
Type 3: Debt (D) is 60%. Equity (E) is 40%. Cost of equity capital (CI) is 7.5%. Cost of debt capital (DI) is 10%.
Investment (IN) is $600,000. Net cash flow (NC) is $90,000. Time (n) is 7.
Rate of return (i) can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the rate of return for plan 1.
Substitute i as 7% by trial and error method in the above calculation.
The calculated present value factor to the annual value is greater than the actual value of 5.3333. Thus, increase the i to 7.3%.
The calculated present value factor to the annual value is nearly equal to the actual value of 5.3333. Thus, cost of capital is verified as 7.3%.
The MARR is equal to the cost of debt capital. Thus, it is 7.5%. The project is accepted if the rate of return is greater than the MARR. Since the rate of return is less than the MARR, type 1 should not be selected.
Table 1 shows the rate of return that is obtained using Equation (1) and the selection decision.
Table -1
Type | Rate of return | MARR | Decision |
1 | 7.3% | 7.5% | Reject |
2 | 22.93% | 7.5% | Select |
3 | 32.18% | 7.5% | Select |
(b):
Calculate the weighted average cost of capital.
(b):
Explanation of Solution
Weighted average cost of capital (WAC) can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to calculate the weighted average cost of capital for type 1.
Weighted average cost of capital is 8%.
Table 2 shows the weighted average cost of capital, which is equal to MARR that is obtained using Equation (2) and the selection decision.
Table -2
Type | Rate of return | MARR | Decision |
1 | 7.3% | 8% | Reject |
2 | 22.93% | 8.75% | Select |
3 | 32.18% | 9% | Select |
(c):
Calculate half of the weighted average cost of capital and cost of equity capital.
(c):
Explanation of Solution
Half of the weighted average cost of capital and cost of equity capital (MARR) can be calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (3) to calculate the MARR for type 1.
MARR is 7.75%.
Table 3 shows the MARR that is obtained using Equation (3) and the selection decision.
Table -2
Type | Rate of return | MARR | Decision |
1 | 7.3% | 7.75% | Reject |
2 | 22.93% | 8.125% | Select |
3 | 32.18% | 8.25% | Select |
From Tables 1 to 3, it is known that type 1 gets rejected and type 2 and type 3 are accepted.
(d):
Calculate half of the weighted average cost of capital and cost of equity capital.
(d):
Explanation of Solution
These three analyses revealed that highly leveraged investment option types 2 and 3 are accepted. Thus, the answer for this question is yes.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
ENGR.ECONOMY CUSTOM FOR TAMU ISEN 667
- Find the equation of the price offer curve and demand curve for the following utility function: U= min (3x, 2y). Let income of the consumer be M, price of good X is Px and price of good Y be Py. Also draw both the curves. (b) Let utility function of a consumer be given by U(x,y) = xy + x, where X and Y are the two goods (i) Is marginal rate of substitution diminishing? (ii) Are marginal utilities of both goods X and Y diminishingarrow_forwardx, y) = 2√x + y. Let price of X be $0.50, price of Y be $1 and income is $10. (i) Find initial equilibrium of the consumer. (ii) Find the new equilibrium if price of X falls to $0.20. (iii) Using Hicksian technique decompose the price effect into substitution and income effectsarrow_forwardPrice elasticity by the hour of day. Average parking occupancy rates of 2011 (i.e., after the rate change) in neighborhoods with a decrease, no change and an increase in rates are also displayed in this figure. 0.0 -0.1 E I -0.2 a S -0.3 t i -0.4 C i -0.5 t Y -0.6 -0.7 -0.8 Hour of the day 60 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 -0.9 -Decrease price elasticities model 1 → Decrease neighborhoods' occupancy in 2011 ...... No price change neighborhoods' occupancy in 2011 Increase price elasticities model 1 ⚫ Increase neighborhoods' occupancy in 2011 50 8333PONG> 40 40 30 20 20 a n C Y 30 10 0 (0°) ૪ Based on the figure showing estimated elasticities after the price increase, what times of day have the most elastic parking demand? Why do you think this is the case? Explain.arrow_forward
- Financial analysis 2022, 2023, and 2024 for O' Reilly's trends in dataarrow_forward9-5. In a replacement analysis for a vacuum seal on a spacecraft, the following data are known about the challenger: the initial investment is $12,000; there is no annual maintenance cost for the first three years, however, it will be $2,000 in each of years four and five, and then $4,500 in the sixth year and increasing by $2,500 each year thereafter. The salvage value is $0 at all times, and MARR is 10% per year. What is the economic life of this challenger? (9.5)arrow_forward9-4. A vehicle costs $30,000 and incurs maintenance costs. increasing by $500 annually, starting at $1,000 in year one. When is it economical to replace it, assuming no salvage value? Use a MARR = 8% per year.arrow_forward
- 9-14. Analyze the replacement of an old crane with $7,000 annual maintenance and a $30,000 current market value with a new one for $100,000 and $2,000 annual maintenance. The MARR is 15% per year.arrow_forward9-15. A small high-speed commercial centrifuge has the following net cash flows and abandonment values over its useful life (Table P9-15, p. 454). The firm's MARR is 12% per year. Determine the optimal time for the centrifuge to be abandoned if its current MV is $9,500 and it won't be used for more than five years. (9.8)arrow_forwardBalance sheet, income statement and statement of cash flow 2022, 2023, and 2024 for AutoZone and trend analysisarrow_forward
- 9-1. An existing machine with a book value of $10,000 has maintenance costs of $2,000 per year. A new machine costs $25,000 with annual maintenance costs of $500. When should the existing machine be replaced? The company's MARR is 15% per year.arrow_forward9-3. Analyze replacing a commercial oven with $800 annual maintenance and a $3,000 salvage value with a new one for $15,000 and $300 annual maintenance. The company's MARR is 12% per year.arrow_forward6. If D(p) = 100/p and c(y) = y2, what is the optimal level of output of the monopolist?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education