(a)
To find: The variables IBI and area using numerical method.
(a)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The obtained result can be shown in tabular form as follows:
Variable |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Area |
28.29 |
17.71 |
IBI |
65.94 |
18.28 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: Calculate the average and standard deviation of IBI and area using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Stat --> Basic statistics --> Display
Step 3: Double click on “Area” and “IBI” to move it to variables column.
Step 4: Click on “Statistics” and check the box for mean and standard deviation.
Step 5: Click “OK” twice to obtain the result.
Results are obtained as
Variable |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Area |
28.29 |
17.71 |
IBI |
65.94 |
18.28 |
To find: The variables IBI and area using graphical method.
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The graph of “Area” is slightly right skewed and the graph of “IBI” is left skewed.
Explanation of Solution
Graph: Construct the histograms to check the skewness using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Go to Graphs > Histogram > Simple histogram.
Step 2: Double click on “Area” and “IBI” to move it to variables column.
Step 3: Click “OK” to obtain the result.
The graph is obtained as
Interpretation: The graph of area is slightly right skewed and the graph of IBI is left skewed.
(b)
To graph: A
(b)
Explanation of Solution
Graph: Construct a scatter plot as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Graph --> Scatterplot. Select scatterplot with regression.
Step 3: Double click on “IBI” to move it Y variable and “Area” to move it to X variable column.
Step 4: Click “OK” twice to obtain the graph.
The scatter plot is obtained as
Interpretation: The graph shows weak linear relationship between IBI and Area with no unusual activity.
(c)
To explain: The statistical model for simple linear regression.
(c)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The model is
Explanation of Solution
where
(d)
To explain: The null and alternate hypotheses.
(d)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The null and alternative hypotheses are
Explanation of Solution
So, the null and alternative hypotheses can be stated as
(e)
To test: The least square
(e)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The obtained output represents that the P-value is less than 0.05. So there is enough evidence for the linearity in the regression line.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: Obtain the regression line using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Stat --> Regression --> Regression.
Step 3: Double click on “IBI” to move it response column and “Area” to move it to predictor column.
Step 4: Click “OK” to obtain the result.
The results are obtained.
Conclusion: From the obtained output, the value of test statistic is 3.42 and the P-value is 0.001. Since the P-value is less than the significance level 0.05, it can be concluded that there is enough evidence for the linearity in the regression line.
(f)
To find: The residuals.
(f)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The residuals are as follows:
Area |
IBI |
Residuals |
21 |
47 |
–15.5862 |
34 |
76 |
7.4318 |
6 |
33 |
–22.6839 |
47 |
78 |
3.4497 |
10 |
62 |
4.4755 |
49 |
78 |
2.5294 |
23 |
33 |
–30.5065 |
32 |
64 |
–3.6479 |
12 |
83 |
24.5552 |
16 |
67 |
6.7146 |
29 |
61 |
–5.2675 |
49 |
85 |
9.5294 |
28 |
46 |
–19.8073 |
8 |
53 |
–3.6042 |
57 |
55 |
–24.1518 |
9 |
71 |
13.9356 |
31 |
59 |
–8.1878 |
10 |
41 |
–16.5245 |
21 |
82 |
19.4138 |
26 |
56 |
–8.8870 |
31 |
39 |
–28.1878 |
52 |
89 |
12.1490 |
21 |
32 |
–30.5862 |
8 |
43 |
–13.6042 |
18 |
29 |
–32.2058 |
5 |
55 |
–0.2237 |
18 |
81 |
19.7942 |
26 |
82 |
17.1130 |
27 |
82 |
16.6529 |
26 |
85 |
20.1130 |
32 |
59 |
–8.6479 |
2 |
74 |
20.1567 |
59 |
80 |
–0.0721 |
58 |
88 |
8.3880 |
19 |
29 |
–32.6659 |
14 |
58 |
–1.3651 |
16 |
71 |
10.7146 |
9 |
60 |
2.9356 |
23 |
86 |
22.4935 |
28 |
91 |
25.1927 |
34 |
72 |
3.4318 |
70 |
89 |
3.8662 |
69 |
80 |
–4.6737 |
54 |
84 |
6.2287 |
39 |
54 |
–16.8690 |
9 |
71 |
13.9356 |
21 |
75 |
12.4138 |
54 |
84 |
6.2287 |
26 |
79 |
14.1130 |
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: Obtain the regression line using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Stat --> Regression --> Regression.
Step 3: Double click on “IBI” to move it to response column and “Area” to move it to predictor column.
Step 4: Click on “Storage” and check the box for residuals.
Step 5: Click “OK” twice to obtain the result.
To graph: The scatterplot.
Explanation of Solution
Graph: Construct a scatterplot using Minitab as follows:
Step 1: Enter the data in Minitab.
Step 2: Click on Graph --> Scatterplot. Select scatterplot with regression.
Step 3: Double click on “Area” to move it X variable and “Residuals” to move it to Y variable column.
Step 4: Click “OK” to obtain the graph.
The scatter plot is obtained as
Interpretation: The graph shows that there is more variation for small
Whether there is something unusual.
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: No, there is nothing unusual.
Explanation of Solution
(g)
That residuals are normal or not.
(g)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The residuals are
Explanation of Solution
Step 1: Click on Stat --> Descriptive statistics --> Normality test.
Step 2: Double click on “Residuals” to move it to the variable column.
Step 3: Click “OK” to obtain the graph.
Conclusion: All the points lie near the trend line and there are no outliers. Therefore, it can be concluded that residuals are normally distributed.
(h)
If the assumptions of statistical inference are satisfied or not.
(h)
Answer to Problem 32E
Solution: The assumptions are satisfied.
Explanation of Solution
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
EBK INTRODUCTION TO THE PRACTICE OF STA
- The average number of minutes Americans commute to work is 27.7 minutes (Sterling's Best Places, April 13, 2012). The average commute time in minutes for 48 cities are as follows: Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Albuquerque 23.3 Jacksonville 26.2 Phoenix 28.3 Atlanta 28.3 Kansas City 23.4 Pittsburgh 25.0 Austin 24.6 Las Vegas 28.4 Portland 26.4 Baltimore 32.1 Little Rock 20.1 Providence 23.6 Boston 31.7 Los Angeles 32.2 Richmond 23.4 Charlotte 25.8 Louisville 21.4 Sacramento 25.8 Chicago 38.1 Memphis 23.8 Salt Lake City 20.2 Cincinnati 24.9 Miami 30.7 San Antonio 26.1 Cleveland 26.8 Milwaukee 24.8 San Diego 24.8 Columbus 23.4 Minneapolis 23.6 San Francisco 32.6 Dallas 28.5 Nashville 25.3 San Jose 28.5 Denver 28.1 New Orleans 31.7 Seattle 27.3 Detroit 29.3 New York 43.8 St. Louis 26.8 El Paso 24.4 Oklahoma City 22.0 Tucson 24.0 Fresno 23.0 Orlando 27.1 Tulsa 20.1 Indianapolis 24.8 Philadelphia 34.2 Washington, D.C. 32.8 a. What is the mean commute time for…arrow_forwardMorningstar tracks the total return for a large number of mutual funds. The following table shows the total return and the number of funds for four categories of mutual funds. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Type of Fund Domestic Equity Number of Funds Total Return (%) 9191 4.65 International Equity 2621 18.15 Hybrid 1419 2900 11.36 6.75 Specialty Stock a. Using the number of funds as weights, compute the weighted average total return for these mutual funds. (to 2 decimals) % b. Is there any difficulty associated with using the "number of funds" as the weights in computing the weighted average total return in part (a)? Discuss. What else might be used for weights? The input in the box below will not be graded, but may be reviewed and considered by your instructor. c. Suppose you invested $10,000 in this group of mutual funds and diversified the investment by placing $2000 in Domestic Equity funds, $4000 in International Equity funds, $3000 in Specialty Stock…arrow_forwardThe days to maturity for a sample of five money market funds are shown here. The dollar amounts invested in the funds are provided. Days to Maturity 20 Dollar Value ($ millions) 20 12 30 7 10 5 6 15 10 Use the weighted mean to determine the mean number of days to maturity for dollars invested in these five money market funds (to 1 decimal). daysarrow_forward
- c. What are the first and third quartiles? First Quartiles (to 1 decimals) Third Quartiles (to 4 decimals) × ☑ Which companies spend the most money on advertising? Business Insider maintains a list of the top-spending companies. In 2014, Procter & Gamble spent more than any other company, a whopping $5 billion. In second place was Comcast, which spent $3.08 billion (Business Insider website, December 2014). The top 12 companies and the amount each spent on advertising in billions of dollars are as follows. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Company Procter & Gamble Comcast Advertising ($billions) $5.00 3.08 2.91 Company American Express General Motors Advertising ($billions) $2.19 2.15 ETET AT&T Ford Verizon L'Oreal 2.56 2.44 2.34 Toyota Fiat Chrysler Walt Disney Company J.P Morgan a. What is the mean amount spent on advertising? (to 2 decimals) 2.55 b. What is the median amount spent on advertising? (to 3 decimals) 2.09 1.97 1.96 1.88arrow_forwardMartinez Auto Supplies has retail stores located in eight cities in California. The price they charge for a particular product in each city are vary because of differing competitive conditions. For instance, the price they charge for a case of a popular brand of motor oil in each city follows. Also shown are the number of cases that Martinez Auto sold last quarter in each city. City Price ($) Sales (cases) Bakersfield 34.99 501 Los Angeles 38.99 1425 Modesto 36.00 294 Oakland 33.59 882 Sacramento 40.99 715 San Diego 38.59 1088 San Francisco 39.59 1644 San Jose 37.99 819 Compute the average sales price per case for this product during the last quarter? Round your answer to two decimal places.arrow_forwardConsider the following data and corresponding weights. xi Weight(wi) 3.2 6 2.0 3 2.5 2 5.0 8 a. Compute the weighted mean (to 2 decimals). b. Compute the sample mean of the four data values without weighting. Note the difference in the results provided by the two computations (to 3 decimals).arrow_forward
- Expert only,if you don't know it don't attempt it, no Artificial intelligence or screen shot it solvingarrow_forwardFor context, the image provided below is a quesion from a Sepetember, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below (the question and the related figure) is from a january 2024 past paperarrow_forward
- For context, the image attached below is a question from a June 2024 past paper in statisical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below are a question from a June, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below (question and related graph) are from a February 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman