
a.
Ascertain the
a.

Explanation of Solution
Net present value method:
Net present value method is the method which is used to compare the initial
Ascertain the net present value of each opportunity, and state whether person K should approve the given project or not as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Net present value of opportunity 1 | |||
Year |
Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) |
Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $55,000 | 0.925926 | $50,925.93 |
2 | $59,000 | 0.857339 | $50,583.00 |
3 | $ 79,000 | 0.793832 | $62,712.73 |
4 | $100,000 | 0.735030 | $73,503.00 |
Total present value of | $237,724.66 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $37,724.66 |
Table (1)
Opportunity 2:
Net present value of opportunity 2 | |||
Year |
Net cash flow (A) | Present value of $1 at 8% [from table 1 in appendix ](B) | Present value of net cash flow |
1 | $102,000 | 0.925926 | $ 94,444.45 |
2 | $108,000 | 0.857339 | $92,592.61 |
3 | $20,000 | 0.793832 | $15,876.64 |
4 | $20,000 | 0.735030 | $14,700.60 |
Total present value of cash flows | $217,614.30 | ||
Less: Cost of investment | $200,000.00 | ||
Net present value of the project | $17,614.30 |
Table (2)
In this case, opportunity 1is better for the investment, because opportunity 1 ($37,724.66) has higher net present value than opportunity 2 ($17,614.30).
b.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person K should approve the given project or not.
b.

Explanation of Solution
Payback period: Payback period is the expected time period which is required to recover the cost of investment. It is one of the capital investment method used by the management to evaluate the proposal of long-term investment (fixed assets) of the business.
Compute the payback period for each project, and state whether person K should approve the given project or not as follows:
Opportunity 1:
Cash payback period of opportunity 1 | ||
Years and months | Net cash flows ($) | Cumulative net cash flows ($) |
1 | 55,000 | 55,000 |
2 | 59,000 | 114,000 |
3 | 79,000 | 193,000 |
1 month (1) | 7,000 | 200,000 |
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 1 is 3 years and 1 month.
Opportunity 2:
Cash payback period of opportunity 2 | ||
Year and months | Net cash flows | Cumulative net cash flows |
1 | 102,000 | 102,000 |
11 months (2) | 98,000 | 200,000 |
Hence, the cash payback period of opportunity 2 is 1 year and 11 months.
In this case, opportunity 2 is better for the investment, because opportunity 2 has shorter payback period than opportunity 1.
Working note:
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 1:
Calculate the number of months in the cash payback period of opportunity 2:
c.
Compare the net present value approach will the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given circumstance.
c.

Explanation of Solution
Compare the net present value approach will the payback approach, and state the method which is better for the given circumstance as follows:
The net present value approach represents the net cash flow with consideration of the time value of money, whereas cash payback technique neglects cash flows occurring after the payback period, and it does not use the present value concept (time value of money) in valuing cash flows that are occurring in the different time period. In other word, payback period approach measures the risk of the investment rather than the profitability.
If an investor is very concerned about the risk of an investment, the payback period approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 2 is better for the investment.
If an investor is very concerned about the profitability of an investment, the net present value approach is best for the decision making. Under this circumstance, opportunity 1 is better for the investment.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
Fundamental Managerial Accounting Concepts with Access
- Job 786 was one of the many jobs started and completed during the year. The job required $8,400 in direct materials and 35 hours of direct labor time at a total direct labor cost of $9,300. If the job contained five units and the company billed at 70% above the unit product cost on the job cost sheet, what price per unit would have been charged to the customer?arrow_forwardWhat is the company's gross profit?arrow_forwardMOH Cost: Top Dog Company has a budget with sales of 7,500 units and $3,400,000. Variable costs are budgeted at $1,850,000, and fixed overhead is budgeted at $970,000. What is the budgeted manufacturing cost per unit?arrow_forward
- What was Ghana's cost of goods sold for 2023?arrow_forwardNeed Answerarrow_forwardSameer has $9,800 of net long-term capital gain and $5,200 of net short-term capital loss. This nets out to a: (a) $4,700 net long-term loss (b) $4,600 net long-term gain (c) $4,700 net short-term gain (d) $4,700 short-term loss helparrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





