The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water. To find: The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

provide answer General accounting question

Financial Account

At an output level of 19,500 units, you have calculated that the degree of operating leverage is 2.92. The operating cash flow is $66,300 in this case. Ignoring the effect of taxes, what are fixed costs?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.

Answer 6

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.

Answer 7

Chapter 10, Problem 1RE

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The person E worked for P&A company as a roadmaster for a railroad in Alaska. He was responsible for safe and effectual maintenance of tracks, marine facilities, and structures. A rock quarry project punctured a high-pressure pipeline running beneath. The person E was held responsible for carelessness and toxicities in water.

To find:The required mental state (mens rea) of the person E for conviction of a crime.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

The application of state of mind under criminal liabilities states that a person is responsible for the obligation for behaving irresponsibly towards the property of others, and also for cheating the owner of the property.

In the above case discussed, the person E can be convicted on the basis of the required state of mind. It is because he was solemnly responsible for the operations and could have exercised the desired powers to prevent the act of damage.