
One of the researchers voiced concern about the effect of the new coating on driving distances. Par would like the new cut-resistant ball to offer driving distances comparable to those of the current-model golf ball. To compare the driving distances for the two balls, 40 balls of both the new and current models were subjected to distance tests. The testing was performed with a mechanical hitting machine so that any difference between the
Managerial Report
- 1. Formulate and present the rationale for a hypothesis test that Par could use to compare the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
- 2. Analyze the data to provide the hypothesis testing conclusion. What is the p-value for your test? What is your recommendation for Par, Inc.?
- 3. Provide
descriptive statistical summaries of the data for each model. - 4. What is the 95% confidence interval for the population mean driving distance of each model, and what is the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the means of the two populations?
- 5. Do you see a need for larger
sample sizes and more testing with the golf balls? Discuss.
1.

State the null and alternative hypothesis.
Answer to Problem 1CP
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The data represents the results of the tests, with distances measured to the nearest yard for the new model and current model.
Here,
State the hypotheses:
Null hypothesis:
That is, there is no difference between the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
Alternative hypothesis:
That is, there is a difference between the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
2.

Find the p-value and provide conclusion.
Answer to Problem 1CP
The p-value is 0.188.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that, there is no difference between the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The test statistic for hypothesis tests about
Software procedure:
Step-by-step software procedure to obtain the confidence interval using MINITAB software is as follows:
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 sample t.
- Choose Samples in columns.
- In First column enter Current.
- In Second column enter New.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using MINTAB software is as follows:
Thus, the test statistic is 1.28 and the p-value is 0.188.
Decision rule based on p-value approach:
If p-value ≤ α, then reject the null hypothesis H0.
If p-value > α, then fail to reject the null hypothesis H0.
Conclusion:
Here, the p-value is 0.188 is greater than the significance level 0.05.
That is,
Thus, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to conclude that, there is no significant difference between the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
3.

Find the descriptive statistical summaries of the data for each model.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Descriptive statistics for current and new model:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step software procedure to obtain the descriptive statistics using MINITAB software is as follows,
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > Display Descriptive Statistics.
- In Variables enter Current and New.
- In Statistics select Mean. SE Mean, StDev, Variance, CoefVar, Q1, Median, Q3, Maximum, IQR.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes.
Output using MINITAB software is as follows
From the output, it can be observed that the mean and median for “current model” is larger than the “new model”. The variance and standard deviation and IQR for “current model” is smaller than “new model”. This indicates that the current model has less variability.
4.

Find the 95% confidence interval for the population mean driving distance of each model.
Find the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the means of the two populations.
Answer to Problem 1CP
The 95% confidence interval for current is
The 95% confidence interval for new is
The 95% confidence interval for the different between the means of the two populations is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Confidence interval for Current:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step software procedure to obtain the confidence interval using MINITAB software is as follows,
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 1 Sample t.
- In Samples in columns enter Current.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes
Output using MINITAB software is as follows
Thus, the 95% confidence interval for current is
Confidence interval for New:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step software procedure to obtain the confidence interval using MINITAB software is as follows,
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 1 Sample t.
- In Samples in columns enter New.
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes
Output using MINITAB software is as follows
Thus, the 95% confidence interval for new is
Confidence interval for different between the means of the two populations:
Software procedure:
Step-by-step software procedure to obtain the confidence interval using MINITAB software is as follows,
- Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Sample t.
- Choose Samples in different columns.
- In First enter Current.
- In Second enter New
- Choose Options.
- In Confidence level, enter 95.
- In Alternative, select not equal.
- Click OK in all the dialogue boxes
Output using MINITAB software is as follows
Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the difference between the means of the two populations is
5.

Explain whether there is any need for larger sample sizes and more testing with the golf balls.
Answer to Problem 1CP
No, there is no need for larger sample sizes and there is no need for more testing with the gold balls.
Explanation of Solution
Justification:
From part (2), the null hypothesis not rejected. That is, there is no difference between the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
Since, the confidence interval for difference between the means of the two populations contains “0” it indicates that there is no difference between the driving distances of the current and new golf balls.
For larger sample size also, the hypotheses test and confidence interval provide the similar results.
Hence, there is need for larger sample sizes and more testing with the golf balls.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 10 Solutions
STATISTICS F/BUSINESS+ECONOMICS-TEXT
- 2. Hypothesis Testing - Two Sample Means A nutritionist is investigating the effect of two different diet programs, A and B, on weight loss. Two independent samples of adults were randomly assigned to each diet for 12 weeks. The weight losses (in kg) are normally distributed. Sample A: n = 35, 4.8, s = 1.2 Sample B: n=40, 4.3, 8 = 1.0 Questions: a) State the null and alternative hypotheses to test whether there is a significant difference in mean weight loss between the two diet programs. b) Perform a hypothesis test at the 5% significance level and interpret the result. c) Compute a 95% confidence interval for the difference in means and interpret it. d) Discuss assumptions of this test and explain how violations of these assumptions could impact the results.arrow_forward1. Sampling Distribution and the Central Limit Theorem A company produces batteries with a mean lifetime of 300 hours and a standard deviation of 50 hours. The lifetimes are not normally distributed—they are right-skewed due to some batteries lasting unusually long. Suppose a quality control analyst selects a random sample of 64 batteries from a large production batch. Questions: a) Explain whether the distribution of sample means will be approximately normal. Justify your answer using the Central Limit Theorem. b) Compute the mean and standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean. c) What is the probability that the sample mean lifetime of the 64 batteries exceeds 310 hours? d) Discuss how the sample size affects the shape and variability of the sampling distribution.arrow_forwardA biologist is investigating the effect of potential plant hormones by treating 20 stem segments. At the end of the observation period he computes the following length averages: Compound X = 1.18 Compound Y = 1.17 Based on these mean values he concludes that there are no treatment differences. 1) Are you satisfied with his conclusion? Why or why not? 2) If he asked you for help in analyzing these data, what statistical method would you suggest that he use to come to a meaningful conclusion about his data and why? 3) Are there any other questions you would ask him regarding his experiment, data collection, and analysis methods?arrow_forward
- Businessarrow_forwardWhat is the solution and answer to question?arrow_forwardTo: [Boss's Name] From: Nathaniel D Sain Date: 4/5/2025 Subject: Decision Analysis for Business Scenario Introduction to the Business Scenario Our delivery services business has been experiencing steady growth, leading to an increased demand for faster and more efficient deliveries. To meet this demand, we must decide on the best strategy to expand our fleet. The three possible alternatives under consideration are purchasing new delivery vehicles, leasing vehicles, or partnering with third-party drivers. The decision must account for various external factors, including fuel price fluctuations, demand stability, and competition growth, which we categorize as the states of nature. Each alternative presents unique advantages and challenges, and our goal is to select the most viable option using a structured decision-making approach. Alternatives and States of Nature The three alternatives for fleet expansion were chosen based on their cost implications, operational efficiency, and…arrow_forward
- The following ordered data list shows the data speeds for cell phones used by a telephone company at an airport: A. Calculate the Measures of Central Tendency from the ungrouped data list. B. Group the data in an appropriate frequency table. C. Calculate the Measures of Central Tendency using the table in point B. 0.8 1.4 1.8 1.9 3.2 3.6 4.5 4.5 4.6 6.2 6.5 7.7 7.9 9.9 10.2 10.3 10.9 11.1 11.1 11.6 11.8 12.0 13.1 13.5 13.7 14.1 14.2 14.7 15.0 15.1 15.5 15.8 16.0 17.5 18.2 20.2 21.1 21.5 22.2 22.4 23.1 24.5 25.7 28.5 34.6 38.5 43.0 55.6 71.3 77.8arrow_forwardII Consider the following data matrix X: X1 X2 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 10.3 10 10.1 10.4 10.1 10.5 What will the resulting clusters be when using the k-Means method with k = 2. In your own words, explain why this result is indeed expected, i.e. why this clustering minimises the ESS map.arrow_forwardwhy the answer is 3 and 10?arrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillBig Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL
- College Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning



